Literature DB >> 12586726

Polymorphism and divergence for island-model species.

John Wakeley1.   

Abstract

Estimates of the scaled selection coefficient, gamma of Sawyer and Hartl, are shown to be remarkably robust to population subdivision. Estimates of mutation parameters and divergence times, in contrast, are very sensitive to subdivision. These results follow from an analysis of natural selection and genetic drift in the island model of subdivision in the limit of a very large number of subpopulations, or demes. In particular, a diffusion process is shown to hold for the average allele frequency among demes in which the level of subdivision sets the timescale of drift and selection and determines the dynamic equilibrium of allele frequencies among demes. This provides a framework for inference about mutation, selection, divergence, and migration when data are available from a number of unlinked nucleotide sites. The effects of subdivision on parameter estimates depend on the distribution of samples among demes. If samples are taken singly from different demes, the only effect of subdivision is in the rescaling of mutation and divergence-time parameters. If multiple samples are taken from one or more demes, high levels of within-deme relatedness lead to low levels of intraspecies polymorphism and increase the number of fixed differences between samples from two species. If subdivision is ignored, mutation parameters are underestimated and the species divergence time is overestimated, sometimes quite drastically. Estimates of the strength of selection are much less strongly affected and always in a conservative direction.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12586726      PMCID: PMC1462400     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  28 in total

1.  Directional selection and the site-frequency spectrum.

Authors:  C D Bustamante; J Wakeley; S Sawyer; D L Hartl
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  The use of intraallelic variability for testing neutrality and estimating population growth rate.

Authors:  M Slatkin; G Bertorelle
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  The Sampling Theory of Neutral Alleles in an Island Population of Fluctuating Size

Authors: 
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 1.570

4.  Inferring the fitness effects of DNA mutations from polymorphism and divergence data: statistical power to detect directional selection under stationarity and free recombination.

Authors:  H Akashi
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism.

Authors:  F Tajima
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations.

Authors:  Y X Fu; W H Li
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Testing the neutral theory of molecular evolution with genomic data from Drosophila.

Authors:  Justin C Fay; Gerald J Wyckoff; Chung-I Wu
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-02-28       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Adaptive protein evolution in Drosophila.

Authors:  Nick G C Smith; Adam Eyre-Walker
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-02-28       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Adaptive protein evolution at the Adh locus in Drosophila.

Authors:  J H McDonald; M Kreitman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-06-20       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  The coalescent process in models with selection and recombination.

Authors:  R R Hudson; N L Kaplan
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  21 in total

1.  Weak selection and recent mutational changes influence polymorphic synonymous mutations in humans.

Authors:  Josep M Comeron
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-04-21       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Selection and drift in subdivided populations: a straightforward method for deriving diffusion approximations and applications involving dominance, selfing and local extinctions.

Authors:  Denis Roze; François Rousset
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Joint effects of self-fertilization and population structure on mutation load, inbreeding depression and heterosis.

Authors:  Denis Roze; François Rousset
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Population genetics of polymorphism and divergence for diploid selection models with arbitrary dominance.

Authors:  Scott Williamson; Adi Fledel-Alon; Carlos D Bustamante
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  The structured ancestral selection graph and the many-demes limit.

Authors:  Paul F Slade; John Wakeley
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-11-01       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 6.  The limits of theoretical population genetics.

Authors:  John Wakeley
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  A composite-likelihood approach for detecting directional selection from DNA sequence data.

Authors:  Lan Zhu; Carlos D Bustamante
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-05-06       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Germline bottlenecks, biparental inheritance and selection on mitochondrial variants: a two-level selection model.

Authors:  Denis Roze; François Rousset; Yannis Michalakis
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-05-23       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Distinguishing between selective sweeps and demography using DNA polymorphism data.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Jensen; Yuseob Kim; Vanessa Bauer DuMont; Charles F Aquadro; Carlos D Bustamante
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-05-23       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Population genetics of speciation in two closely related wild tomatoes (Solanum section Lycopersicon).

Authors:  Thomas Städler; Uraiwan Arunyawat; Wolfgang Stephan
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.