Literature DB >> 25797043

Failure of many United States Department of Health Web sites to provide accurate information about the female condom.

Christina Ventura-DiPersia1, Kristina Rodriguez2, Elizabeth A Kelvin3.   

Abstract

Uptake of the female condom (FC) in the United States has historically been low; inadequate promotion may be one barrier faced by potential users. We performed a content analysis of state and municipal health department Web sites to describe how the FC is being promoted for pregnancy and disease prevention. We found that only a slim majority (60.8%) of health department Web sites mention the FC at all and those that do include numerous inaccuracies in their messaging. These inaccuracies may discourage uptake of the FC or have a detrimental impact on the experience when using the product for the first time.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Contraception; DOH Web sites; Department of health; Female condom; Online health information

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25797043      PMCID: PMC5901680          DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2015.03.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  9 in total

1.  Patterns and predictors of female condom use among ethnically diverse women attending family planning clinics.

Authors:  Kyung-Hee Choi; Steven E Gregorich; Kim Anderson; Olga Grinstead; Cynthia A Gómez
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.830

2.  The future of the female condom.

Authors:  Susie Hoffman; Joanne Mantell; Theresa Exner; Zena Stein
Journal:  Int Fam Plan Perspect       Date:  2004-09

3.  The female condom: the international denial of a strong potential.

Authors:  Anny Peters; Willy Jansen; Francien van Driel
Journal:  Reprod Health Matters       Date:  2010-05

4.  Roles of local public health agencies within the state public health system.

Authors:  Leslie M Beitsch; Meade Grigg; Nir Menachemi; Robert G Brooks
Journal:  J Public Health Manag Pract       Date:  2006 May-Jun

5.  The female condom in the age of antiretroviral-based HIV prevention.

Authors:  Susie Hoffman
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2012-12-31       Impact factor: 2.681

6.  How do consumers search for and appraise health information on the world wide web? Qualitative study using focus groups, usability tests, and in-depth interviews.

Authors:  Gunther Eysenbach; Christian Köhler
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-03-09

7.  Contraceptive efficacy and acceptability of the female condom.

Authors:  G Farr; H Gabelnick; K Sturgen; L Dorflinger
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  A randomized controlled trial to evaluate a structural intervention to promote the female condom in New York state.

Authors:  Theresa M Exner; James M Tesoriero; Haven B Battles; Susie Hoffman; Joanne E Mantell; Jacqueline Correale; Jessica Adams-Skinner; Dara A Shapiro; Kirsten Rowe; Richard A Cotroneo; Cheng-Shiun Leu; Joyce Hunter; Susan J Klein
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2012-07

9.  Use-effectiveness of the female versus male condom in preventing sexually transmitted disease in women.

Authors:  P P French; M Latka; E L Gollub; C Rogers; D R Hoover; Z A Stein
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.830

  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  Acceptability of the Woman's Condom in a phase III multicenter open-label study.

Authors:  Beatrice A Chen; Diana L Blithe; Gitonga R Muraguri; Audrey A Lance; Bruce R Carr; Jeffrey T Jensen; Thomas D Kimble; Amitasrigowri S Murthy; Courtney A Schreiber; Michael A Thomas; Terri L Walsh; Carolyn Westhoff; Anne E Burke
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 3.375

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.