Literature DB >> 2199875

A guide to interpreting contraceptive efficacy studies.

J Trussell1, R A Hatcher, W Cates, F H Stewart, K Kost.   

Abstract

Results of trials of various birth control methods and contraceptive products may provide misleading data and engender unrealistic expectations regarding efficacy. An analysis of published efficacy-trials reveals numerous fallacies in their design, performance, and reporting. Consequently, family planning clinicians find it virtually impossible to make valid comparisons among the methods or products. This article reviews the definitions and measures that have been used to assess contraceptive efficacy, describes and illustrates some of the flaws that confound interpretation and comparison of studies, and presents a set of recommendations for future studies. A summary table providing comparative failure rates for all methods of contraception is included.

Keywords:  Americas; Comparative Studies; Contraception; Contraception Failure; Contraceptive Effectiveness; Contraceptive Usage; Critique; Developed Countries; Family Planning; North America; Northern America; Research Methodology; Studies; United States; Use-effectiveness; World

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2199875

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  6 in total

1.  Condoms for dual protection: patterns of use with highly effective contraceptive methods.

Authors:  Karen Pazol; Michael R Kramer; Carol J Hogue
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2010 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.792

2.  Contraceptive efficacy and acceptability of the female condom.

Authors:  G Farr; H Gabelnick; K Sturgen; L Dorflinger
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 3.  Interactions between antiepileptic drugs and hormonal contraception.

Authors:  Pamela Crawford
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.749

4.  Natural Family Planning, An Option in Reproductive Healthcare: A Qualitative Study on Clinicians' Perceptions.

Authors:  Ozoemena Joan Ibeziako
Journal:  Linacre Q       Date:  2022-03-27

Review 5.  The creeping Pearl: Why has the rate of contraceptive failure increased in clinical trials of combined hormonal contraceptive pills?

Authors:  James Trussell; David Portman
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 3.375

6.  Counting the costs: comparing depot medroxyprogesterone acetate and norethisterone oenanthate utilisation patterns in South Africa.

Authors:  J Smit; A Gray; L McFadyen; K Zuma
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2001-06-04       Impact factor: 2.655

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.