Literature DB >> 7996567

In defence of ageism.

A B Shaw1.   

Abstract

Health care should be preferentially allocated to younger patients. This is just and is seen as just. Age is an objective factor in rationing decisions. The arguments against 'ageism' are answered. The effects of age on current methods of rationing are illustrated, and the practical applications of an age-related criterion are discussed. Ageist policies are in current use and open discussion of them is advocated.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Analytical Approach; Health Care and Public Health

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7996567      PMCID: PMC1376507          DOI: 10.1136/jme.20.3.188

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  10 in total

1.  The problem with futility.

Authors:  R D Truog; A S Brett; J Frader
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1992-06-04       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  "Futility" as a criterion in limiting treatment.

Authors:  M Solomon
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1992-10-22       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Age and other determinants of survival after in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Authors:  S O'Keeffe; C Redahan; P Keane; K Daly
Journal:  Q J Med       Date:  1991-12

4.  Age as a criterion for rationing health care.

Authors:  N G Levinsky
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1990-06-21       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Is rationing inevitable?

Authors:  A S Relman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1990-06-21       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Justice and the economics of terminal illness.

Authors:  R M Veatch
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  1988 Aug-Sep       Impact factor: 2.683

7.  The fortysomething barrier: medicine and age discrimination.

Authors:  P Forster
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-03-06

8.  Rationing in practice: the case of in vitro fertilisation.

Authors:  S Redmayne; R Klein
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-06-05

9.  Prioritising health services in an era of limits: the Oregon experience.

Authors:  J A Kitzhaber
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-08-07

10.  Priority setting in the NHS: reports from six districts.

Authors:  C Ham
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-08-14
  10 in total
  9 in total

Review 1.  Health care rationing in the aged: ethical and clinical perspectives.

Authors:  E G Howe; C J Lettieri
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 2.  Capabilities and health.

Authors:  P Anand
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  [Ethics and monetary values. Influence of economical aspects on decision-making in intensive care].

Authors:  J Boldt; T Schöllhorn
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.041

4.  Age as a basis for healthcare rationing. Arguments against agism.

Authors:  S Scharf; H Flamer; N Christophidis
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 3.923

5.  In defence of ageism.

Authors:  A B Shaw
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 2.903

6.  Protecting elderly people: flaws in ageist arguments.

Authors:  M M Rivlin
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-05-06

7.  In defence of ageism.

Authors:  M M Rivlin
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 2.903

8.  Covid-19 and age discrimination: benefit maximization, fairness, and justified age-based rationing.

Authors:  Andreas Albertsen
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2022-10-15

9.  Ensuring equity and quality of care for elderly people: a critique of the College report.

Authors:  A B Shaw
Journal:  J R Coll Physicians Lond       Date:  1995 Mar-Apr
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.