Literature DB >> 15863692

Capabilities and health.

P Anand1.   

Abstract

Sen's capabilities approach offers a radical generalisation of the conventional approach to welfare economics. It has been highly influential in development and many researchers are now beginning to explore its implications for health care. This paper contributes to the emerging debate by discussing two examples of such applications: first, at the individual decision making level, namely the right to die, and second, at the social choice level. For the first application, which draws on Nussbaum's list of capabilities, it is argued that many capabilities are ambiguously or indirectly related to the right to die, but the ability to form a concept of the good life and plan one's own life provides a direct justification for such a right. In the second application, the focus is specifically on healthcare rationing and it is argued that, although not committed to age based rationing, the capabilities approach provides a more natural justification of age related access to health care than the fair innings argument, which is often used to justify the alleged ageism inherent in quality adjusted life years (QALY) maximisation.

Keywords:  Analytical Approach; Death and Euthanasia; Health Care and Public Health

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15863692      PMCID: PMC1734139          DOI: 10.1136/jme.2004.008706

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  11 in total

1.  The 'fair innings argument' deserves a fairer hearing! Comments by Alan Williams on Nord and Johannesson.

Authors:  A Williams
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.046

2.  On the economic foundations of CEA. Ladies and gentlemen, take your positions!

Authors:  W B Brouwer; M A Koopmanschap
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  Valuing the benefits and costs of health care programmes: where's the 'extra' in extra-welfarism?

Authors:  Stephen Birch; Cam Donaldson
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.634

4.  Why health equity?

Authors:  Amartya Sen
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.046

5.  Age-related preferences and age weighting health benefits.

Authors:  A Tsuchiya
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 6.  Intergenerational equity: an exploration of the 'fair innings' argument.

Authors:  A Williams
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  1997 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.046

7.  In defence of ageism.

Authors:  A B Shaw
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 2.903

8.  Effect of discussion and deliberation on the public's views of priority setting in health care: focus group study.

Authors:  P Dolan; R Cookson; B Ferguson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-04-03

9.  QALYs and ageism: philosophical theories and age weighting.

Authors:  A Tsuchiya
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.046

10.  Maximizing health benefits vs egalitarianism: an Australian survey of health issues.

Authors:  E Nord; J Richardson; A Street; H Kuhse; P Singer
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 4.634

View more
  19 in total

1.  "And how is life going for you?" an account of subjective welfare in medicine.

Authors:  David Molyneux
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  Cost-effectiveness of integrated care in frail elderly using the ICECAP-O and EQ-5D: does choice of instrument matter?

Authors:  Peter Makai; Willemijn Looman; Eddy Adang; René Melis; Elly Stolk; Isabelle Fabbricotti
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2014-04-24

Review 3.  Outcome measurement in economic evaluations of public health interventions: a role for the capability approach?

Authors:  Paula K Lorgelly; Kenny D Lawson; Elisabeth A L Fenwick; Andrew H Briggs
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2010-05-06       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  The development of capability measures in health economics: opportunities, challenges and progress.

Authors:  Joanna Coast; Philip Kinghorn; Paul Mitchell
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.883

5.  Virtue and austerity.

Authors:  Peter Allmark
Journal:  Nurs Philos       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.279

6.  Psychometric validation of a multi-dimensional capability instrument for outcome measurement in mental health research (OxCAP-MH).

Authors:  Francis Vergunst; Crispin Jenkinson; Tom Burns; Paul Anand; Alastair Gray; Jorun Rugkåsa; Judit Simon
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 3.186

7.  Can capabilities be self-reported? A think aloud study.

Authors:  Hareth Al-Janabi; Thomas Keeley; Paul Mitchell; Joanna Coast
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 4.634

8.  Test-retest reliability of capability measurement in the UK general population.

Authors:  Hareth Al-Janabi; Terry N Flynn; Tim J Peters; Stirling Bryan; Joanna Coast
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2014-09-09       Impact factor: 3.046

9.  An investigation of the construct validity of the ICECAP-A capability measure.

Authors:  Hareth Al-Janabi; Tim J Peters; John Brazier; Stirling Bryan; Terry N Flynn; Sam Clemens; Alison Moody; Joanna Coast
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2012-10-20       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Functional health state description and valuation by people aged 65 and over: a pilot study.

Authors:  Riaan Botes; Karin M Vermeulen; Adelita V Ranchor; Erik Buskens
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 3.921

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.