Literature DB >> 7995147

Prognostic predictors in colorectal cancer.

G Lindmark1, B Gerdin, L Påhlman, R Bergström, B Glimelius.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Better prognostic predictors in colorectal cancer than the Dukes stage are necessary for individualized therapy and follow-up.
METHODS: Survival among 212 patients operated on for colorectal cancer was examined regarding various clinical, histopathologic, cellular, and serologic tumor characteristics.
RESULTS: Beside the Dukes stage, which was the most powerful variable, the erythrocyte sedimentation rate, leukocyte blood count, alkaline phosphatase, aspartate aminotransferase, six different serum tumor markers, number of small blood vessels, and age were found to be significantly associated with survival. The leukocyte blood count, alkaline phosphatase, and aspartate aminotransferase retained their significance in a multivariate model including tumor differentiation, local tumor stage, and age. Inclusion of tissue polypeptide antigen, the most powerful tumor marker in the multivariate model, showed that only the tumor stage, tissue polypeptide antigen, and age were statistically significantly correlated to survival. This was valid both for the group of patients considered as potentially curable and for those who potentially have been cured (Dukes Stages A-C).
CONCLUSIONS: A great number of prognostic predictors failed to discard Dukes stage as the best one. One serum tumor marker, tissue polypeptide antigen, contains independent additional prognostic information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7995147     DOI: 10.1007/BF02257785

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  25 in total

1.  Preoperative staging of rectal cancer: accuracy of 3-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Chan Kyo Kim; Seung Hoon Kim; Ho Kyung Chun; Woo-Yong Lee; Seong-Hyeon Yun; Sang-Yong Song; Dongil Choi; Hyo Keun Lim; Min Ju Kim; Jongmee Lee; Soon Jin Lee
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-01-17       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Gastrointestinal surgery in old age: issues of equality and quality.

Authors:  D G Seymour
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  The De Ritis (aspartate transaminase/alanine transaminase) ratio as a predictor of oncological outcomes in patients after surgery for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Yang Hyun Cho; Jun Eul Hwang; Ho Seok Chung; Myung Soo Kim; Eu Chang Hwang; Seung Il Jung; Taek Won Kang; Dong Deuk Kwon; Seock Hwan Choi; Hyun Tae Kim; Tae-Hwan Kim; Tae Gyun Kwon; Joon Hwa Noh; Myung Ki Kim; Chul-Sung Kim; Sung Gu Kang; Seok Ho Kang; Jun Cheon; Chan Ho Lee; Ja Yoon Ku; Hong Koo Ha; Bum Sik Tae; Chang Wook Jeong; Ja Hyeon Ku; Cheol Kwak; Hyeon Hoe Kim
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 2.370

4.  The clinical and biological significance of MIR-224 expression in colorectal cancer metastasis.

Authors:  Hui Ling; Karen Pickard; Cristina Ivan; Alex Mirnezami; George A Calin; Milena S Nicoloso; Claudio Isella; Mariko Ikuo; Richard Mitter; Riccardo Spizzo; Marc Bullock; Cornelia Braicu; Valentina Pileczki; Kimberly Vincent; Martin Pichler; Verena Stiegelbauer; Gerald Hoefler; Maria I Almeida; Annie Hsiao; Xinna Zhang; John Primrose; Graham Packham; Kevin Liu; Krishna Bojja; Roberta Gafà; Lianchun Xiao; Simona Rossi; Jian H Song; Ivan Vannini; Francesca Fanini; Scott Kopetz; Patrick Zweidler-McKay; Xuemei Wang; Calin Ionescu; Alexandru Irimie; Muller Fabbri; Giovanni Lanza; Stanley R Hamilton; Ioana Berindan-Neagoe; Enzo Medico
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  Gadolinium-enhanced dynamic magnetic resonance imaging with endorectal coil for local staging of rectal cancer.

Authors:  Mitsuharu Tamakawa; Yuriko Kawaai; Ryuji Shirase; Taishi Satoh; Hidenari Akiba; Hideki Hyodoh; Masato Hareyama; Tomohisa Furuhata; Koichi Hirata; Tadashi Hasegawa
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2010-05-29       Impact factor: 2.374

6.  Endorectal ultrasonography versus phased-array magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative staging of rectal cancer.

Authors:  Ahmet-Mesrur Halefoglu; Sadik Yildirim; Omer Avlanmis; Damlanur Sakiz; Adil Baykan
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-06-14       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Peripheral and mesenteric serum levels of CEA and cytokeratins, staging and histopathological variables in colorectal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Ivan-Gregorio Ivankovics; Luis-Cesar Fernandes; Sarhan-Sydeney Saad; Delcio Matos
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-11-21       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  The number of lymph nodes is correlated with mesorectal morphometry.

Authors:  N Pirro; C Pignodel; P Cathala; P Fabbro-Peray; G Godlewski; M Prudhomme
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2008-02-26       Impact factor: 1.246

9.  The association between serum liver enzymes and cancer mortality.

Authors:  Somaya Albhaisi; Rehan Qayyum
Journal:  Clin Exp Med       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 3.984

10.  Quantitative assessment of tumor responses after radiation therapy in a DLD-1 colon cancer mouse model using serial dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Sung Jun Ahn; Woong Sub Koom; Chan Sik An; Joon Seok Lim; Seung-Koo Lee; Jin-Suck Suh; Ho-Taek Song
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 2.759

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.