Literature DB >> 20512547

Gadolinium-enhanced dynamic magnetic resonance imaging with endorectal coil for local staging of rectal cancer.

Mitsuharu Tamakawa1, Yuriko Kawaai, Ryuji Shirase, Taishi Satoh, Hidenari Akiba, Hideki Hyodoh, Masato Hareyama, Tomohisa Furuhata, Koichi Hirata, Tadashi Hasegawa.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of dynamic gadolinium (Gd)-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with endorectal coil for assessing tumor invasion based on simple classification criteria.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 58 patients with operable primary rectal cancer underwent preoperative MRI. An enhancement pattern in Gd-enhanced dynamic MRI with regard to tumor penetration was clarified. Retrospectively, two observers independently scored T2-weighted MRI and T2-weighted MRI combined with Gd-enhanced dynamic MRI for tumor penetration using the following criteria: With Gd-enhanced dynamic MRI, T1 tumors showed an early enhanced line around the tumor as rim enhancement; T2 tumors appeared as black lines or double layers, as the muscularis propria kept its integrity; T3 tumors showed partial discontinuity of the muscularis propria as a dotted line and a perforated area as an interrupted line. A confidence level scoring system was used, and receiver operating characteristic curves were generated.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences at the T1 stage. There were significant differences for observer 1 (P = 0.001 for observer 1) at the T2 stage. There were significant differences for both observers (P = 0.001 for observer 1 and P = 0.005 for observer 2) at the T3 stage.
CONCLUSION: Our criteria for Gd-enhanced dynamic MRI were effective for T3 stage tumors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20512547     DOI: 10.1007/s11604-010-0425-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jpn J Radiol        ISSN: 1867-1071            Impact factor:   2.374


  23 in total

1.  Improved survival with preoperative radiotherapy in resectable rectal cancer.

Authors:  B Cedermark; M Dahlberg; B Glimelius; L Påhlman; L E Rutqvist; N Wilking
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1997-04-03       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Preoperative staging of rectal carcinoma by computed tomography and 0.15T magnetic resonance imaging. Preliminary report.

Authors:  C G Hodgman; R L MacCarty; B G Wolff; G R May; T H Berquist; P F Sheedy; R W Beart; R J Spencer
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 4.585

3.  Assessment of rectal tumor infiltration utilizing endorectal MR imaging and comparison with endoscopic rectal sonography.

Authors:  R J Zagoria; C A Schlarb; D J Ott; R I Bechtold; N T Wolfman; E S Scharling; M Y Chen; B W Loggie
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.454

4.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of bacterial abscess and VX2 carcinoma in rabbits: comparison of gadopentetate dimeglumine and a macromolecular contrast agent.

Authors:  W K Moon; K H Chang; H J Weinmann; Y H Koh; J G Im; K M Yeon; M C Han
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Rectal carcinoma: prospective comparison of conventional and gadopentetate dimeglumine enhanced fat-suppressed MR imaging.

Authors:  H Okizuka; K Sugimura; T Yoshizako; Y Kaji; A Wada
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1996 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Preoperative staging of rectal cancer using magnetic resonance imaging with external phase-arrayed coils.

Authors:  Giuseppe Gagliardi; Sancar Bayar; Robert Smith; Ronald R Salem
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2002-04

7.  Pelvic imaging with phased-array coils: quantitative assessment of signal-to-noise ratio improvement.

Authors:  C E Hayes; M J Dietz; B F King; R L Ehman
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1992 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Rectal cancer: MR imaging in local staging--is gadolinium-based contrast material helpful?

Authors:  Roy F A Vliegen; Geerard L Beets; Maarten F von Meyenfeldt; Alfons G H Kessels; Etienne E M T Lemaire; Jos M A van Engelshoven; Regina G H Beets-Tan
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-11-18       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Endoscopic ultrasound and endorectal magnetic resonance imaging: a prospective, comparative study for preoperative staging and follow-up of rectal cancer.

Authors:  C Meyenberger; R A Huch Böni; P Bertschinger; G F Zala; H P Klotz; G P Krestin
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 10.093

10.  Rectal tumor stage: correlation of endorectal MR imaging and pathologic findings.

Authors:  M D Schnall; E E Furth; E F Rosato; H Y Kressel
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 11.105

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.