Literature DB >> 7994949

Cemented long-stem revision total knee arthroplasty.

P B Murray1, J A Rand, A D Hanssen.   

Abstract

Theoretical concerns about the use of cemented long-stemmed revision total knee arthroplasty include inducing stress shielding with adverse effects on prosthesis fixation. This study details the clinical outcome of 35 patients with 40 cemented long-stemmed kinematic stabilizer revision total knee arthroplasties at followup evaluation averaging 58.2 months (range, 24-111 months). Of these 40 revision arthroplasties, there were 25 long-stemmed tibial components and 38 long-stemmed femoral components. The Knee Society pain score improved from a preoperative value of 38 points (range, 4-80 points) to 83 points (range, 33-100 points) at last evaluation. The Knee Society function score improved from a preoperative value of 46 points (range, 5-100 points) to 64 points (range, 0-100 points) at last evaluation. Initial postoperative radiographs showed tibial bone-cement radiolucencies in 5 knees, but at final followup none of these radiolucencies had progressed. Radiolucencies developed in 5 additional tibial components by the time of final followup, but these were all incomplete and < 1 mm in width. Two femoral components had initial postoperative radiolucencies. These radiolucencies remained stable in 1 knee, whereas the other knee had asymptomatic radiographic loosening. Incomplete radiolucencies of < 1 mm developed in 3 additional femoral components at final followup. The incidence of tibial radiolucencies of 32% in the present study is similar to the incidence of radiolucencies with a nonstemmed revision cemented total knee arthroplasty, with the same prosthetic design, previously reported from the authors' institution.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7994949

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  25 in total

Review 1.  Fixation of revision TKA: a review of the literature.

Authors:  J Beckmann; C Lüring; R Springorum; F X Köck; J Grifka; M Tingart
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Stem length in revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Anay Rajendra Patel; Brian Barlow; Amar S Ranawat
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2015-12

3.  Extent of vertical cementing as a predictive factor for radiolucency in revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Du Hyun Ro; Yool Cho; Sahnghoon Lee; Kee Yun Chung; Seong Hwan Kim; Young Min Lee; Joon Kyu Lee; Myung Chul Lee
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Modified hybrid stem fixation in revision TKA is durable at 2 to 10 years.

Authors:  Alexander P Sah; Sanjai Shukla; Craig J Della Valle; Aaron G Rosenberg; Wayne G Paprosky
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Results of press-fit stems in revision knee arthroplasties.

Authors:  Gavin C Wood; Douglas D R Naudie; Steven J MacDonald; Richard W McCalden; Robert B Bourne
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-11-26       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Constraint choice in revision knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Michele Vasso; Philippe Beaufils; Alfredo Schiavone Panni
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Tantalum Cones Provide Durable Mid-term Fixation in Revision TKA.

Authors:  Ivan De Martino; Vincenzo De Santis; Peter K Sculco; Rocco D'Apolito; Joseph B Assini; Giorgio Gasparini
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 8.  Fixation of stem in revision of total knee arthroplasty: cemented versus cementless-a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Changyao Wang; Tilman Pfitzner; Philipp von Roth; Hermann O Mayr; Michael Sostheim; Robert Hube
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-12-19       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  A 30-mm cemented stem extension provides adequate fixation of the tibial component in revision knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Paul F Lachiewicz; Elizabeth S Soileau
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Are cementless stems more durable than cemented stems in two-stage revisions of infected total knee arthroplasties?

Authors:  Paul K Edwards; Thomas K Fehring; William G Hamilton; Brett Perricelli; Walter B Beaver; Susan M Odum
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.