Literature DB >> 7994188

Normal ranges for bone loss rates.

P D Ross1, Y F He, J W Davis, R S Epstein, R D Wasnich.   

Abstract

We reported previously that the variability in bone loss rates among postmenopausal women decreases dramatically during the first few years of followup. In this paper, we have examined the distributions of bone loss rates measured at the calcaneus, distal radius and proximal radius. The incidence of physical impairment was five times greater among women with bone loss rates faster than 2 S.D. below the mean. Because the rate of change in bone density was skewed at the lower end of the distribution (representing rapid bone loss), the influence of values at the extreme ends of the distribution were statistically removed in order to estimate the normal distribution of bone loss rates. For the convenience of clinicians, the upper and lower limits of the 90 and 70% normal ranges are presented. Because average bone loss rates vary with age, normal ranges are provided separately by age group. The width of each normal range decreased by at least half after 3 or 4 years of followup, compared to less than 1 year. Consequently, measured loss rates which were well within the normal range at 1 year were sometimes far outside the normal range for longer followup times. We conclude that followup duration has a profound effect on estimates of the normal range, and must be considered when interpreting the clinical significance of measured loss rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7994188     DOI: 10.1016/s0169-6009(08)80061-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Miner        ISSN: 0169-6009


  5 in total

1.  Variability of vertebral and femoral postmenopausal bone loss: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  J M Pouillès; F Trémollières; C Ribot
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Intrinsic material property differences in bone tissue from patients suffering low-trauma osteoporotic fractures, compared to matched non-fracturing women.

Authors:  S Vennin; A Desyatova; J A Turner; P A Watson; J M Lappe; R R Recker; M P Akhter
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 3.  Adverse effects of antiepileptic drugs on bone structure: epidemiology, mechanisms and therapeutic implications.

Authors:  A M Pack; M J Morrell
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 4.  Consensus of an international panel on the clinical utility of bone mass measurements in the detection of low bone mass in the adult population.

Authors:  P D Miller; S L Bonnick; C J Rosen
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 4.333

5.  Evolution of spinal bone loss and biochemical markers of bone remodeling after menopause in normal women.

Authors:  J Reeve; J Pearson; A Mitchell; J Green; A Nicholls; J Justice; E Hudson; L Klenerman
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 4.333

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.