Literature DB >> 7584869

Evolution of spinal bone loss and biochemical markers of bone remodeling after menopause in normal women.

J Reeve1, J Pearson, A Mitchell, J Green, A Nicholls, J Justice, E Hudson, L Klenerman.   

Abstract

The main objective of this study was to describe longitudinal patterns of spinal bone loss in normal women who undergo a natural menopause. The second objective was to determine if a proportion of women suffer excessively rapid postmenopausal bone loss from the spine. If this was the case it was the aim to devise a means of predicting the woman at excess risk; but if all women lost bone at similar rates, the aim was to document changing loss rates over the first 5-8 postmenopausal years. Responding women in six suburban general practices recalled for cervical smears who had their last menstrual period 9- 36 months previously were invited to participate in a longitudinal study of bone loss and the biochemical markers plasma osteocalcin and urinary hydroxyproline. Sixty-four subjects agreed to participate, a response rate of 80%. In the ensuing 5 years, six received hormone replacement therapy and are not reported on. The main outcome measures were rates of spinal bone loss over 5 years, measured by dual photon absorptiometry, and radial bone loss over the first 2 years measured to quantitative computed tomography. Spinal bone loss was similar between individuals, with 94% of the variability in the data being accounted for by a statistical model that assumed parallel rates of bone loss. A less restrictive model allowing women to have different rates of spinal bone loss accounted for 12% more of the remaining variance in the data than the previous model. However, rates of radial bone loss were more dissimilar between women than rates of spinal loss. The results of the biochemical data collected serially showed that the plasma osteocalcin rose slowly to a plateau at 5 years postmenopause; in contrast, the hydroxyproline fell progressively with time over the whole period of study. These results were interpreted as being consistent with diminishing rates of bone destruction which gradually reequilibrated with bone formation as time passed after menopause.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7584869     DOI: 10.1007/BF00298429

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int        ISSN: 0171-967X            Impact factor:   4.333


  33 in total

1.  Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in normal women: a cross-sectional study of 717 Finnish volunteers.

Authors:  H Kröger; J Heikkinen; K Laitinen; A Kotaniemi
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Perimenopausal appendicular bone loss: a 10-year prospective study.

Authors:  J A Falch; L Sandvik
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 4.398

3.  Prediction of rapid bone loss in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  C Christiansen; B J Riis; P Rødbro
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1987-05-16       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Appendicular bone density and age predict hip fracture in women. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group.

Authors:  S R Cummings; D M Black; M C Nevitt; W S Browner; J A Cauley; H K Genant; S R Mascioli; J C Scott; D G Seeley; P Steiger
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1990-02-02       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Normal ranges for bone loss rates.

Authors:  P D Ross; Y F He; J W Davis; R S Epstein; R D Wasnich
Journal:  Bone Miner       Date:  1994-08

6.  Quantitative measurement of bone density using gamma-ray computed tomography.

Authors:  T N Hangartner; T R Overton
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 1.826

7.  The impact of menopausal age on future fragility fracture risk.

Authors:  P Gärdsell; O Johnell; B E Nilsson
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 6.741

8.  Bone remodelling does not decline after menopause in vertebral fracture osteoporosis.

Authors:  J S Wand; J R Green; R Hesp; J N Bradbeer; P N Sambrook; T Smith; L Hampton; J M Zanelli; J Reeve
Journal:  Bone Miner       Date:  1992-06

9.  Bone density at various sites for prediction of hip fractures. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group.

Authors:  S R Cummings; D M Black; M C Nevitt; W Browner; J Cauley; K Ensrud; H K Genant; L Palermo; J Scott; T M Vogt
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-01-09       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Baseline measurement of bone mass predicts fracture in white women.

Authors:  S L Hui; C W Slemenda; C C Johnston
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1989-09-01       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  8 in total

1.  Dietary determinants of post-menopausal bone loss at the lumbar spine: a possible beneficial effect of iron.

Authors:  R Abraham; J Walton; L Russell; R Wolman; B Wardley-Smith; J R Green; A Mitchell; J Reeve
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-06-07       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  The role of biochemical markers of bone turnover in osteoporosis management in clinical practice.

Authors:  Samuel D Vasikaran; Paul Glendenning; Howard A Morris
Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev       Date:  2006-08

3.  Biochemical markers of bone turnover part II: clinical applications in the management of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Markus J Seibel
Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev       Date:  2006-08

4.  Chronic increase of bone turnover markers after biliopancreatic diversion is related to secondary hyperparathyroidism and weight loss. Relation with bone mineral density.

Authors:  José Antonio Balsa; José I Botella-Carretero; Roberto Peromingo; Carmen Caballero; Teresa Muñoz-Malo; Juan J Villafruela; Francisco Arrieta; Isabel Zamarrón; Clotilde Vázquez
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.129

5.  Urinary excretion of the pyridinium cross-links of collagen in systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  Y Kipen; R Will; B J Strauss; E F Morand
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.980

6.  Bone resorption and fracture across the menopausal transition: the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation.

Authors:  Jane A Cauley; Michelle E Danielson; Gail A Greendale; Joel S Finkelstein; Yue-Fang Chang; Joan C Lo; Carolyn J Crandall; Robert M Neer; Kristine Ruppert; Leslie Meyn; Beth A Prairie; MaryFran R Sowers
Journal:  Menopause       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 2.953

7.  Nutritional and exercise-related determinants of bone density in elite female runners.

Authors:  Jane H Gibson; Angela Mitchell; Mark G Harries; Jonathan Reeve
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-03-26       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 8.  Markers of bone turnover for the prediction of fracture risk and monitoring of osteoporosis treatment: a need for international reference standards.

Authors:  S Vasikaran; R Eastell; O Bruyère; A J Foldes; P Garnero; A Griesmacher; M McClung; H A Morris; S Silverman; T Trenti; D A Wahl; C Cooper; J A Kanis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-12-24       Impact factor: 4.507

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.