Literature DB >> 28132909

Intrinsic material property differences in bone tissue from patients suffering low-trauma osteoporotic fractures, compared to matched non-fracturing women.

S Vennin1, A Desyatova1, J A Turner1, P A Watson2, J M Lappe2, R R Recker2, M P Akhter3.   

Abstract

Osteoporotic (low-trauma) fractures are a significant public health problem. Over 50% of women over 50yrs. of age will suffer an osteoporotic fracture in their remaining lifetimes. While current therapies reduce skeletal fracture risk by maintaining or increasing bone density, additional information is needed that includes the intrinsic material strength properties of bone tissue to help develop better treatments, since measurements of bone density account for no more than ~50% of fracture risk. The hypothesis tested here is that postmenopausal women who have sustained osteoporotic fractures have reduced bone quality, as indicated with measures of intrinsic material properties compared to those who have not fractured. Transiliac biopsies (N=120) were collected from fracturing (N=60, Cases) and non-fracturing postmenopausal women (N=60, age- and BMD-matched Controls) to measure intrinsic material properties using the nano-indentation technique. Each biopsy specimen was embedded in epoxy resin and then ground, polished and used for the nano-indentation testing. After calibration, multiple indentations were made using quasi-static (hardness, modulus) and dynamic (storage and loss moduli) testing protocols. Multiple indentations allowed the median and variance to be computed for each type of measurement for each specimen. Cases were found to have significantly lower median values for cortical hardness and indentation modulus. In addition, cases showed significantly less within-specimen variability in cortical modulus, cortical hardness, cortical storage modulus and trabecular hardness, and more within-specimen variability in trabecular loss modulus. Multivariate modeling indicated the presence of significant independent mechanical effects of cortical loss modulus, along with variability of cortical storage modulus, cortical loss modulus, and trabecular hardness. These results suggest mechanical heterogeneity of bone tissue may contribute to fracture resistance. Although the magnitudes of differences in the intrinsic properties were not overwhelming, this is the first comprehensive study to investigate, and compare the intrinsic properties of bone tissue in fracturing and non-fracturing postmenopausal women.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone quality; Fracture toughness; Intrinsic material properties; Nano-indentation testing; Osteoporotic fractures

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28132909      PMCID: PMC5367951          DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2017.01.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  88 in total

1.  Intrinsic material properties of trabecular bone by nanoindentation testing of biopsies taken from healthy women before and after menopause.

Authors:  Benjamin J Polly; Philip A Yuya; Mohammed P Akhter; Robert R Recker; Joseph A Turner
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 4.333

2.  Rapid establishment of chemical and mechanical properties during lamellar bone formation.

Authors:  B Busa; L M Miller; C T Rubin; Y-X Qin; S Judex
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2005-12-05       Impact factor: 4.333

3.  Cooperative deformation of mineral and collagen in bone at the nanoscale.

Authors:  Himadri S Gupta; Jong Seto; Wolfgang Wagermaier; Paul Zaslansky; Peter Boesecke; Peter Fratzl
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-11-09       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Nanogranular origins of the strength of bone.

Authors:  Kuangshin Tai; Franz-Josef Ulm; Christine Ortiz
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 11.189

5.  Mechanical properties and the hierarchical structure of bone.

Authors:  J Y Rho; L Kuhn-Spearing; P Zioupos
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.242

6.  Bone intrinsic material properties in three inbred mouse strains.

Authors:  M P Akhter; Z Fan; J Y Rho
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2004-07-30       Impact factor: 4.333

7.  Bone properties by nanoindentation in mild and severe osteogenesis imperfecta.

Authors:  Carolyne Albert; John Jameson; Jeffrey M Toth; Peter Smith; Gerald Harris
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 2.063

8.  Two different correlations between nanoindentation modulus and mineral content in the bone-cartilage interface.

Authors:  H S Gupta; S Schratter; W Tesch; P Roschger; A Berzlanovich; T Schoeberl; K Klaushofer; P Fratzl
Journal:  J Struct Biol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.867

9.  A methodology for the investigation of toughness and crack propagation in mouse bone.

Authors:  Alessandra Carriero; Elizabeth A Zimmermann; Sandra J Shefelbine; Robert O Ritchie
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2014-07-09

10.  Bisphosphonate treatment affects trabecular bone apparent modulus through micro-architecture rather than matrix properties.

Authors:  J S Day; M Ding; P Bednarz; J C van der Linden; T Mashiba; T Hirano; C C Johnston; D B Burr; I Hvid; D R Sumner; H Weinans
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.494

View more
  10 in total

1.  Chlorthalidone vs. potassium citrate in a model of hypercalciuria: differential effects on stone and bone.

Authors:  Gianmarco Lombardi; Pietro Manuel Ferraro; Giovanni Gambaro
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-09

Review 2.  The Role of Matrix Composition in the Mechanical Behavior of Bone.

Authors:  Mustafa Unal; Amy Creecy; Jeffry S Nyman
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 5.096

3.  Altered collagen chemical compositional structure in osteopenic women with past fractures: A case-control Raman spectroscopic study.

Authors:  Gurjit S Mandair; Mohammed P Akhter; Francis W L Esmonde-White; Joan M Lappe; Susan P Bare; William R Lloyd; Jason P Long; Jessica Lopez; Kenneth M Kozloff; Robert R Recker; Michael D Morris
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 4.626

4.  Variables Reflecting the Mineralization of Bone Tissue From Fracturing Versus Nonfracturing Postmenopausal Nonosteoporotic Women.

Authors:  Sébastien Rizzo; Delphine Farlay; Mohammed Akhter; Adele Boskey; Robert Recker; Joan Lappe; Georges Boivin
Journal:  JBMR Plus       Date:  2018-06-20

5.  Cathepsin K inhibition preserves compressive load in lumbar vertebrae of osteoporotic monkeys.

Authors:  Isabel D Colón-Bernal; Le T Duong; Brenda Pennypacker; James Henderson; Kenneth M Kozloff; Mark M Banaszak Holl
Journal:  Bone Rep       Date:  2018-10-18

6.  Age-related and sex-specific effects on architectural properties and biomechanical response of the C57BL/6N mouse femur, tibia and ulna.

Authors:  Hammad Mumtaz; Mark Dallas; Mark Begonia; Nuria Lara-Castillo; JoAnna M Scott; Mark L Johnson; Thiagarajan Ganesh
Journal:  Bone Rep       Date:  2020-04-23

Review 7.  Modeling Complex Orthopedic Trauma in Rodents: Bone, Muscle and Nerve Injury and Healing.

Authors:  Huaishuang Shen; Aysha M Gardner; Juhee Vyas; Ryosuke Ishida; Vivianne L Tawfik
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 5.810

8.  Bone hydration: How we can evaluate it, what can it tell us, and is it an effective therapeutic target?

Authors:  Rachel K Surowiec; Matthew R Allen; Joseph M Wallace
Journal:  Bone Rep       Date:  2021-12-21

9.  A pilot study on the nanoscale properties of bone tissue near lacunae in fracturing women.

Authors:  Wen Qian; Roman Schmidt; Joseph A Turner; Sue P Bare; Joan M Lappe; Robert R Recker; Mohammed P Akhter
Journal:  Bone Rep       Date:  2022-07-16

10.  The compositional and nano-structural basis of fracture healing in healthy and osteoporotic bone.

Authors:  Neashan Mathavan; Mikael J Turunen; Manuel Guizar-Sicairos; Martin Bech; Florian Schaff; Magnus Tägil; Hanna Isaksson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.