Literature DB >> 7982813

Effects of stimulus level on nonspectral frequency discrimination by human subjects.

B E Pfingst1, L A Holloway, N Poopat, A R Subramanya, M F Warren, T A Zwolan.   

Abstract

Frequency difference limens were determined as a function of reference-stimulus level for pulsatile electrical stimuli in 5 postlingually deaf human subjects with Nucleus-22 cochlear implants and for sinusoidally amplitude-modulated acoustic white noise stimuli in 4 normal-hearing humans. Subjects were tested at levels throughout the dynamic range and extending to the lowest detectable levels. Response stability was measured over the course of 10 sessions. For electrical stimulation in the deaf ears, difference limens decreased as a function of level throughout much or all of the dynamic range of hearing. This result contrasts with the case for nonspectral acoustic stimulation of normal-hearing subjects, where nonspectral frequency difference limens were strongly affected by level only near the detection threshold. These data suggest differences in the acoustic and electrical response spaces that must be considered in the design of auditory prosthesis processors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7982813     DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(94)90026-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  10 in total

1.  Channel Interaction and Current Level Affect Across-Electrode Integration of Interaural Time Differences in Bilateral Cochlear-Implant Listeners.

Authors:  Katharina Egger; Piotr Majdak; Bernhard Laback
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-09-16

2.  Effects of carrier pulse rate and stimulation site on modulation detection by subjects with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Bryan E Pfingst; Li Xu; Catherine S Thompson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Psychophysical assessment of stimulation sites in auditory prosthesis electrode arrays.

Authors:  Bryan E Pfingst; Rose A Burkholder-Juhasz; Teresa A Zwolan; Li Xu
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-11-28       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Relationship between gap detection thresholds and loudness in cochlear-implant users.

Authors:  Soha N Garadat; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-12-17       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 5.  Music perception with cochlear implants: a review.

Authors:  Hugh J McDermott
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2004

6.  Rate discrimination, gap detection and ranking of temporal pitch in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Stefano Cosentino; Robert P Carlyon; John M Deeks; Wendy Parkinson; Julie A Bierer
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-04-21

Review 7.  Pitch perception and auditory stream segregation: implications for hearing loss and cochlear implants.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2008-10-30

8.  Effect of Chronic Stimulation and Stimulus Level on Temporal Processing by Cochlear Implant Listeners.

Authors:  Robert P Carlyon; François Guérit; Alexander J Billig; Yu Chuen Tam; Frances Harris; John M Deeks
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-12-12

9.  Perceptual learning of pitch provided by cochlear implant stimulation rate.

Authors:  Susan R S Bissmeyer; Shaikat Hossain; Raymond L Goldsworthy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The Effect of Side of Implantation on the Cortical Processing of Frequency Changes in Adult Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Chun Liang; Lisa H Wenstrup; Ravi N Samy; Jing Xiang; Fawen Zhang
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 4.677

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.