Literature DB >> 7979073

Outcome of surgery for failed endoscopic extraction of common bile duct stones in elderly patients.

B R Davidson1, A Lauri, R Horton, A Burroughs, J Dooley.   

Abstract

Endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) is the treatment of choice for common bile duct stones in elderly patients. For those in whom endoscopic clearance of the common bile duct fails the treatment options include stenting, dissolution therapy and lithotripsy. Surgery is often avoided because of the reported high morbidity and mortality in elderly patients. We have reviewed the outcome of patients referred for surgery after failed endoscopic clearance of common bile duct stones. Over a 3-year period, 100 patients with common bile duct stones were referred specifically for endoscopic clearance of the common bile duct (median age 69 years, range 19-97 years). In seven patients duct clearance was possible without ES and in five patients ES was considered inappropriate. ES was attempted in 88 patients and was successful in 75 (85%). Of the 13 patients failing ES or stone removal, surgery was performed in nine and four were stented. Of patients having successful ES (n = 75), ten were referred for surgery because of incomplete duct clearance. Surgery was performed to obtain duct clearance in 19 patients (eight male, 11 female, median age 77 years, range 47-90 years). Of the 19, eight had previously undergone a cholecystectomy (42%) and 17 of the 19 had biliary tract drainage preoperatively (90%). The procedures performed consisted of choledocholithotomy in all plus cholecystectomy (11), choledochoduodenostomy (7) and choledochojejunostomy (7). There were no deaths and only one major complication. The median total inpatient stay was 26 days (range 14-75 days) and the median postoperative stay was 12 days (range 7-50 days). We would conclude that open surgery can be performed safely and effectively in elderly patients with retained bile duct stones.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7979073      PMCID: PMC2502382     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  28 in total

1.  Large bile duct stones treated by endoscopic biliary drainage.

Authors:  J Kiil; A Kruse; M Rokkjaer
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 3.982

2.  A retrospective study of surgical common bile-duct exploration: ten years experience.

Authors:  J A Roukema; E J Carol; F Liem; J J Jakimowicz
Journal:  Neth J Surg       Date:  1986-02

Review 3.  Giant bile duct stones--non-surgical treatment.

Authors:  M Classen; F Hagenmüller; K Knyrim; E Frimberger
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 10.093

4.  Endoscopic extraction of bile duct stones: management related to stone size.

Authors:  A Lauri; R C Horton; B R Davidson; A K Burroughs; J S Dooley
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  Choledochoscopy: are stones missed? A controlled study.

Authors:  P C Gartell; F P McGinn
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Management of acute cholangitis and the impact of endoscopic sphincterotomy.

Authors:  T Leese; J P Neoptolemos; A R Baker; D L Carr-Locke
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Medium term complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy.

Authors:  P A Winstanley; W R Ellis; I Hamilton; D J Lintott; A T Axon
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  Mechanical lithotripsy of bile duct stones in 209 patients--effect of technical advances.

Authors:  M U Schneider; W Matek; R Bauer; W Domschke
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 10.093

9.  Study of common bile duct exploration and endoscopic sphincterotomy in a consecutive series of 438 patients.

Authors:  J P Neoptolemos; B R Davidson; D E Shaw; D Lloyd; D L Carr-Locke; D P Fossard
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Exploration of the common bile duct: a comparative study.

Authors:  K D Vellacott; P H Powell
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  1 in total

1.  Factors predicting outcome after selective ERCP in the laparoscopic era.

Authors:  G S Robertson; P R Johnson; B J Rathbone; A C Wicks; D M Lloyd; P S Veitch
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 1.891

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.