Literature DB >> 3664223

Study of common bile duct exploration and endoscopic sphincterotomy in a consecutive series of 438 patients.

J P Neoptolemos1, B R Davidson, D E Shaw, D Lloyd, D L Carr-Locke, D P Fossard.   

Abstract

The outcome of 438 consecutive patients who had exploration of the common bile duct and/or endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) in a 5-year period was reviewed. Patients were analysed according to four groups: 59 patients had planned ES followed by surgery resulting in 14 major complications (23.7 per cent) including 3 deaths (5.1 per cent) (group 1); 248 patients had surgery alone with 21 major complications (8.5 per cent) including 10 deaths (4.0 per cent) (group 2); 114 patients with gallbladder in situ underwent ES alone with 22 major complications (19.3 per cent) including 9 deaths (7.9 per cent) (group 3); 17 patients with remote cholecystectomy also had ES alone with 3 major complications (17.6 per cent) including 3 deaths (17.6 per cent) (group 4). There was no difference in mortality between the groups. Compared with group 2, major complications were significantly higher in group 1 (chi 2 = 11.0, d.f. = 1, P less than 0.001) and in group 3 (chi 2 = 8.6, d.f. = 1, P less than 0.003). Patients in group 3, however, were significantly older than those in groups 1 and 2, and the former also had higher medical and total risk factor scores than the latter (all P less than 0.001). The results indicate that routine pre-operative ES is of questionable value. ES alone is justified in elderly high risk patients; mortality in this group might be reduced by improved management of post-ES complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3664223     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800741014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  20 in total

1.  Pancreatic Duct Strictures.

Authors: 
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2000-10

2.  Choledocholithiasis. Endoscopic sphincterotomy or common bile duct exploration.

Authors:  S C Stain; H Cohen; M Tsuishoysha; A J Donovan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Retained common bile duct stones after endoscopic sphincterotomy: temporary and longterm treatment with biliary stenting.

Authors:  D G Maxton; D E Tweedle; D F Martin
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 4.  The challenge of the bile duct in 1990.

Authors:  A L Peel
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  Open common bile duct exploration--end of an epoch?

Authors:  S T O'Sullivan; D J Hehir; G C O'Sullivan; W O Kirwan
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  1996 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.568

6.  Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography using a mobile image intensifier.

Authors:  K D Vellacott; J Kenogbon; G Griffiths; J Mason
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 1.891

7.  Additional endoscopic procedures instead of urgent surgery for retained common bile duct stones.

Authors:  S R Cairns; L Dias; P B Cotton; P R Salmon; R C Russell
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  A multivariate analysis of preoperative risk factors in patients with common bile duct stones. Implications for treatment.

Authors:  J P Neoptolemos; D E Shaw; D L Carr-Locke
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Role of biliary stenting in the management of bile duct stones in the elderly.

Authors:  H R Dalton; R W Chapman
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 23.059

10.  Common bile duct stenting for choledocholithiasis: a district general hospital experience.

Authors:  D J Bowrey; L J Fligelstone; A Solomon; G Thomas; A A Shandall
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 2.401

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.