Literature DB >> 8282260

Endoscopic extraction of bile duct stones: management related to stone size.

A Lauri1, R C Horton, B R Davidson, A K Burroughs, J S Dooley.   

Abstract

Endoscopic sphincterotomy has become the first line treatment for patients with common bile duct (CBD) stones. This technique may fail, however, due to difficult anatomy, previous surgery, periampullary diverticula or the presence of a large stone. The importance of stone size to the success of endoscopic sphincterotomy has not been fully assessed. A prospective study was carried out over the period January 1987 to December 1989 on 100 patients (45 male, 55 female, median age 69 years, range 19-97) with CBD stones in which a policy of early duct clearance was followed. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) was performed and the stone size and number recorded from the cholangiograms and corrected for magnification. Sphincterotomy was performed using a diathermy unit with a cutting current and stones were extracted using a balloon catheter or a Dormia basket. Of the 100 patients with CBD stones receiving ERCP, successful clearance of the biliary tree was possible in seven without endoscopic sphincterotomy and five were felt to be unsuitable for endoscopic sphincterotomy. Of the remaining 88 patients endoscopic sphincterotomy was successful in 75 (85%). Of the 75 patients having endoscopic sphincterotomy stone clearance was successful in 44 (59%). There were no deaths and only four complications, which rapidly resolved on conservative treatment (two acute pancreatitis, two bleeding). The number of CBD stones present was similar in those patients with successful endoscopic sphincterotomy and duct clearance (median 1, range 1-10, n = 44) as in those in whom it failed (median 2, range 1-6, n = 31). In contrast there was a highly significant difference when stone size was analysed (successful clearance median stone size 10 mm, range 3-27 mm; unsuccessful: median 18 mm, range 10-42, p<0.001). Stones less than 10 mm in diameter (n=21) were all removed successfully whereas in patients with stones over 15 mm (n=25) only three were removed endoscopically (12%). All patients with evidence of residual stones had additional treatment. Of these 31 patients, 10 had surgery, 11 had insertion of an endoprosthesis, and 10 had dissolution treatment with methyl-tert-butyl ether through a nasobiliary catheter. This study shows the importance of stone size to the success rate of endoscopic removal of bile duct stones.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8282260      PMCID: PMC1374470          DOI: 10.1136/gut.34.12.1718

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gut        ISSN: 0017-5749            Impact factor:   23.059


  14 in total

1.  The European experience with laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  A Cuschieri; F Dubois; J Mouiel; P Mouret; H Becker; G Buess; M Trede; H Troidl
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  Methyl-tert-butyl-ether for treating bile duct stones: the British experience.

Authors:  J P Neoptolemos; C Hall; H J O'Connor; W R Murray; D L Carr-Locke
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Changing therapy for gallstone disease.

Authors:  L W Way
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1990-11-01       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile duct stones in patients with intact gallbladders.

Authors:  D T Hansell; M A Millar; W R Murray; G R Gray; G Gillespie
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Endoscopic stenting for long-term treatment of large bile duct stones: 2- to 5-year follow-up.

Authors:  P B Cotton; A Forbes; J W Leung; L Dineen
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 6.  Giant bile duct stones--non-surgical treatment.

Authors:  M Classen; F Hagenmüller; K Knyrim; E Frimberger
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 10.093

7.  Endoscopic sphincterotomy for common bile duct calculi in patients with gall bladder in situ considered unfit for surgery.

Authors:  B R Davidson; J P Neoptolemos; D L Carr-Locke
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  Early and late complications after endoscopic sphincterotomy for biliary lithiasis with and without the gall bladder 'in situ'.

Authors:  J Escourrou; J A Cordova; F Lazorthes; J Frexinos; A Ribet
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 23.059

9.  Endoscopic papillotomy for removal of common bile duct stones without cholecystectomy.

Authors:  J G Moss; J H Saunders; S R Wild
Journal:  J R Coll Surg Edinb       Date:  1985-04

10.  Methyl tert butyl ether dissolution therapy for common bile duct stones.

Authors:  G L Kaye; J A Summerfield; N McIntyre; J S Dooley
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 25.083

View more
  27 in total

Review 1.  The E.A.E.S. Consensus Development Conferences on laparoscopic cholecystectomy, appendectomy, and hernia repair. Consensus statements--September 1994. The Educational Committee of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery.

Authors:  E Neugebauer; H Troidl; C K Kum; E Eypasch; M Miserez; A Paul
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Ampulla dilation with different sized balloons to remove common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Neng-Ping Li; Jiang-Qi Liu; Zhi-Qiang Zhou; Tao-Ying Ji; Xiao-Yan Cai; Qing-Yun Zhu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Quality indicators for ERCP.

Authors:  Douglas G Adler; John G Lieb; Jonathan Cohen; Irving M Pike; Walter G Park; Maged K Rizk; Mandeep S Sawhney; James M Scheiman; Nicholas J Shaheen; Stuart Sherman; Sachin Wani
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 4.  How to measure quality in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).

Authors:  Alexander Krumov Katzarov; Zdravko Ivanov Dunkov; Ivan Popadiin; Krum Sotirov Katzarov
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-07

Review 5.  The usefulness of SpyGlass™ choledochoscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of biliary disorders.

Authors:  J B Williamson; P V Draganov
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2012-12

Review 6.  Endoscopic management of difficult common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Guru Trikudanathan; Udayakumar Navaneethan; Mansour A Parsi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Endoscopic extraction of large common bile duct stones: A review article.

Authors:  Gerasimos Stefanidis; Christos Christodoulou; Spilios Manolakopoulos; Ram Chuttani
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2012-05-16

Review 8.  Endoscopic Management of Difficult Bile Duct Stones.

Authors:  Murad Aburajab; Kulwinder Dua
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2018-03-23

Review 9.  Endoscopic management of biliary stone disease.

Authors:  P Wilson; Gjm Webster
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-02-10

10.  Difficult bile duct stones.

Authors:  Lee McHenry; Glen Lehman
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.