Literature DB >> 7970738

Visual field analysis using artificial neural networks.

S E Spenceley1, D B Henson, D R Bull.   

Abstract

There have been several reports on the application of artificial neural networks (ANNs) to visual field classification. While these have demonstrated that neural networks can be used with good results they have not explored the effects that the training set can have upon network performance nor emphasized the unique value of ANNs in visual field analysis. This paper considers the problem of differentiating normal and glaucomatous visual fields and explores different training set characteristics using field data collected from a Henson CFS2000 perimeter. Training set properties including size, balance between normals and glaucomas, extent of field loss and the spatial location of glaucomatous defects are explored. A multilayer network with 132 input nodes, 20 hidden layer nodes and 2 output nodes in trained using an error backpropagation algorithm. Both sensitivity and specificity are measured during testing. The results demonstrate that large random sets are better than small random sets since sensitivity improves with size and specificity is not adversely affected. The variability in performance also reduces as training set size increases. In addition, sets that are biased towards glaucoma examples are more sensitive and less specific, while sets biased with normal examples are more specific and less sensitive than balanced sets. Thus large training sets with class balance are generally desirable for good sensitivities and specificities. The actual glaucoma examples contained in the set are also important. A training set deficient in examples has no detrimental effect on sensitivity or specificity. The spatial distribution of defects is also crucial. Spatially biased sets are unable to recognize defects that occur in locations where no previous defect has been presented while more balanced sets lead to better performance. In conclusion the 'ideal' training set should contain many examples of early defects that represent the full range of locations where these defects may occur.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7970738     DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.1994.tb00004.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt        ISSN: 0275-5408            Impact factor:   3.117


  12 in total

1.  Automated localisation of the optic disc, fovea, and retinal blood vessels from digital colour fundus images.

Authors:  C Sinthanayothin; J F Boyce; H L Cook; T H Williamson
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Towards the automatic interpretation of retinal images.

Authors:  P Undrill
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Predicting glaucomatous progression in glaucoma suspect eyes using relevance vector machine classifiers for combined structural and functional measurements.

Authors:  Christopher Bowd; Intae Lee; Michael H Goldbaum; Madhusudhanan Balasubramanian; Felipe A Medeiros; Linda M Zangwill; Christopher A Girkin; Jeffrey M Liebmann; Robert N Weinreb
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Baseline visual field findings in the Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension Treatment Trial (IIHTT).

Authors:  John L Keltner; Chris A Johnson; Kimberly E Cello; Michael Wall
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Spatial classification of glaucomatous visual field loss.

Authors:  D B Henson; S E Spenceley; D R Bull
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  Automatic detection of diabetic retinopathy using an artificial neural network: a screening tool.

Authors:  G G Gardner; D Keating; T H Williamson; A T Elliott
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 4.638

7.  Analysis of visual field progression in glaucoma.

Authors:  F W Fitzke; R A Hitchings; D Poinoosawmy; A I McNaught; D P Crabb
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 4.638

8.  Assessing visual field clustering schemes using machine learning classifiers in standard perimetry.

Authors:  Catherine Boden; Kwokleung Chan; Pamela A Sample; Jiucang Hao; Te-Wan Lee; Linda M Zangwill; Robert N Weinreb; Michael H Goldbaum
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Glaucomatous patterns in Frequency Doubling Technology (FDT) perimetry data identified by unsupervised machine learning classifiers.

Authors:  Christopher Bowd; Robert N Weinreb; Madhusudhanan Balasubramanian; Intae Lee; Giljin Jang; Siamak Yousefi; Linda M Zangwill; Felipe A Medeiros; Christopher A Girkin; Jeffrey M Liebmann; Michael H Goldbaum
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Detection of progression of glaucomatous visual field damage using the point-wise method with the binomial test.

Authors:  Ayako Karakawa; Hiroshi Murata; Hiroyo Hirasawa; Chihiro Mayama; Ryo Asaoka
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.