Literature DB >> 2761405

On the role of word frequency in the detection of component letters.

N F Johnson, P A Allen, T L Strand.   

Abstract

The experiments reported in this study were conducted to explore the issue of race models versus holistic models of word processing. In both types of model, it is assumed that an available word-level encoding for a display will conceal letter information, and thereby inhibit component-letter detection. However, whereas in holistic models it is assumed that encoding always should occur at the word or pattern level first, in the race models it is assumed that encoding occurs at all levels (e.g., feature, letter, and word) simultaneously, with the final level of encoding being at whatever level has been completed first. If the rate of word-level encoding is facilitated by increasing word frequency, the holistic models predict a generally declining latency for letter detection, because the initial step in letter detection (i.e., word-level encoding) will be occurring more rapidly. The race models, on the other hand, predict that with increasing word frequency there will be an increasing chance that the word-level encoding will win the encoding race, resulting in an increase in the latency for letter detection (i.e., the word code will conceal the letter codes). Two experiments are reported, and the obtained pattern of latency data appears to be most consistent with the race models.

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2761405     DOI: 10.3758/bf03202621

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  9 in total

1.  Detection errors onthe andand: Evidence for reading units larger than the word.

Authors:  A Drewnowski; A F Healy
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1977-11

2.  Evidence for lexical access in a simultaneous matching task.

Authors:  S M Chambers; K I Forster
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1975-09

3.  The locus of the word-priority effect in a target-detection task.

Authors:  J A Sloboda
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1977-05

4.  When redundancy hurts letter detection: an attempt to define one condition.

Authors:  N F Johnson; A J Blum
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1988-02

5.  On the detection of letters within redundant arrays.

Authors:  N F Johnson
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1986-08

6.  Part-whole relationships in the processing of small visual patterns.

Authors:  N F Johnson; M Turner-Lyga; B S Pettegrew
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1986-01

7.  Investigating the boundaries of reading units: letter detection in misspelled words.

Authors:  A F Healy; A Drewnowski
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Why search for target absence is so slow (and careful!): the more targets there are, the more likely you are to miss one.

Authors:  L E Krueger; R G Shapiro
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Identification of words and letters within words.

Authors:  N F Johnson; H H Marmurek
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1978-09
  9 in total
  8 in total

1.  Episodic effects on the visual comparison of letters in words.

Authors:  H H Marmurek
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-11

2.  The word-superiority effect and phonological recoding.

Authors:  L E Krueger
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1992-11

3.  Effect of imagery ability on letter-level and word-level processing.

Authors:  P A Allen; B Wallace; E Waag
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-03

4.  Letter detection: A window to unitization and other cognitive processes in reading text.

Authors:  A F Healy
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1994-09

5.  Multiple routes to word recognition: evidence from event-related potentials.

Authors:  Mei-Ching Lien; Philip A Allen; Eric Ruthruff
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2019-10-17

6.  The effect of semantic priming on the detection of letters within words.

Authors:  T L Blum; N F Johnson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1993-05

7.  Influence of imaging ability on word transformation.

Authors:  P A Allen; B Wallace; F Loschiavo
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1994-09

8.  Gradients versus dichotomies: how strength of semantic context influences event-related potentials and lexical decision times.

Authors:  Barbara J Luka; Cyma Van Petten
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 3.526

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.