Literature DB >> 528895

Orthographic regularity, positional frequency, and visual processing of letter strings.

D W Massaro, R L Venezky, G A Taylor.   

Abstract

Previous research has demonstrated that familiarity with the orthographic structure within a letter string can facilitate the processing of the component letters. The current research was directed at discovering the psychologically relevant properties of this structure. Two fundamental descriptions were independently varied in the construction of six-letter nonword strings. A probabilistic description based on the frequency of occurrence of letters in each position was factorially combined with a rule-governed description defined in terms of graphemic and phonological constraints. College sophomores and sixth-grade readers were asked to indicate whether or not a predesignated target letter was present in these strings. For both groups of readers, orthographic regularity and summed positional frequency were found to have only a small facilitative effect on reaction time (RT). In contrast, RTs to say "no" increased dramatically with increases in the number of letters in the catch string that were physically similar to the target letter. In another experiment, the letter string was presented for a short duration, followed immediately by masking stimulus and then the target letter. College students indicated whether or not the target was present in the test string. Accuracy of performance was critically dependent on the orthographic regularity and summed positional frequencies of the letters in the test string. No effect of letter similarity was observed. The large differences that were observed between these two tasks were accounted for in terms of the stages of processing that are critical for performance in the tasks.

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 528895

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  15 in total

1.  Dynamic sensory sensitivity and children's word decoding skills.

Authors:  J B Talcott; C Witton; M F McLean; P C Hansen; A Rees; G G Green; J F Stein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-03-14       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The word-superiority effect and phonological recoding.

Authors:  L E Krueger
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1992-11

3.  From print to sound in mature readers as a function of reader ability and two forms of orthographic regularity.

Authors:  M Mason
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1978-09

4.  Preserved nodal number effects under equal reinforcement.

Authors:  Ting Wang; Charlotte Dack; Louise McHugh; Robert Whelan
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.986

5.  The word-detection effect: sophisticated guessing or perceptual enhancement?

Authors:  W Prinzmetal; C E Lyon
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1996-05

6.  Specific word transfer as a measure of processing in the word-superiority paradigm.

Authors:  C A Hayman; L L Jacoby
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1989-03

7.  Influence of imaging ability on word transformation.

Authors:  P A Allen; B Wallace; F Loschiavo
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1994-09

8.  The interaction of pronunciation rules and lexical representations in reading aloud.

Authors:  M B Rosson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1985-01

9.  Resolving 20 years of inconsistent interactions between lexical familiarity and orthography, concreteness, and polysemy.

Authors:  M A Gernsbacher
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1984-06

10.  Letters and words in word identification.

Authors:  J A Umansky; S M Chambers
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1980-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.