Literature DB >> 10995850

Common firing patterns of hippocampal cells in a differential reinforcement of low rates of response schedule.

B Young1, N McNaughton.   

Abstract

Lesion studies show that the hippocampus is critically involved in timing behavior, but so far there has been little analysis of how it might encode time. We recorded the activity of 266 CA1 neurons, 51 CA3 neurons, and 219 entorhinal neurons from rats performing on a differential reinforcement of low rates (DRL) 15 sec schedule in which reinforcement was contingent on responses that occurred at least 15 sec after the preceding response. The unit data were analyzed using two different methods. First, each unit was subjected to an ANOVA that examined the effects of the following: (1) the outcome of the previous response (reward or nonreward); (2) the outcome of the response on which the firing of the cell was synchronized; and (3) time. This showed that, for CA1, CA3, and entorhinal cortex, changes in unit activity were related to all aspects of the task, with the firing of >90% of units recorded in each region being related to at least one of the three factors. Second, intercorrelations between the firing profiles of individual units revealed several functional categories of hippocampal neurons but no clear categories of entorhinal neurons. Of the hippocampal categories, the most common profile was an initial increase in unit activity at the beginning of the DRL interval, followed by a gradual decrease throughout the interval. We suggest that this profile reflects temporal decay in circuits that may code details of the previous trial and that could be used to "time" the DRL interval.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10995850      PMCID: PMC6772825     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  31 in total

1.  EFFECT OF BILATERAL HIPPOCAMPAL ABLATION ON DRL PERFORMANCE.

Authors:  C V CLARK; R L ISAACSON
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1965-02

2.  Neuronal correlate of pictorial short-term memory in the primate temporal cortex.

Authors:  Y Miyashita; H S Chang
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1988-01-07       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Hippocampal neurons in the monkey with activity related to the place in which a stimulus is shown.

Authors:  E T Rolls; Y Miyashita; P M Cahusac; R P Kesner; H Niki; J D Feigenbaum; L Bach
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Neuronal correlate of visual associative long-term memory in the primate temporal cortex.

Authors:  Y Miyashita
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1988-10-27       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Collateral behaviors and the DRL deficit of rats with septal lesions.

Authors:  R L Slonaker; D Hothersall
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1972-07

6.  A driveable bundle of microwires for collecting single-unit data from freely-moving rats.

Authors:  J L Kubie
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1984-01

7.  Single-unit analysis of different hippocampal cell types during classical conditioning of rabbit nictitating membrane response.

Authors:  T W Berger; P C Rinaldi; D J Weisz; R F Thompson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Correlates of hippocampal complex-spike cell activity in rats performing a nonspatial radial maze task.

Authors:  B J Young; G D Fox; H Eichenbaum
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Cue-sampling and goal-approach correlates of hippocampal unit activity in rats performing an odor-discrimination task.

Authors:  H Eichenbaum; M Kuperstein; A Fagan; J Nagode
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Sequential dependencies regulate sensory evoked responses of single units in the rat hippocampus.

Authors:  T C Foster; E P Christian; R E Hampson; K A Campbell; S A Deadwyler
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1987-04-07       Impact factor: 3.252

View more
  11 in total

1.  Estradiol impairs response inhibition in young and middle-aged, but not old rats.

Authors:  Victor C Wang; Steven L Neese; Donna L Korol; Susan L Schantz
Journal:  Neurotoxicol Teratol       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 3.763

Review 2.  Emerging, reemerging, and forgotten brain areas of the reward circuit: Notes from the 2010 Motivational Neural Networks conference.

Authors:  Vincent B McGinty; Benjamin Y Hayden; Sarah R Heilbronner; Eric C Dumont; Steven M Graves; Martine M Mirrione; Johann du Hoffmann; Gregory C Sartor; Rodrigo A España; E Zayra Millan; Alexandra G Difeliceantonio; Nathan J Marchant; T Celeste Napier; David H Root; Stephanie L Borgland; Michael T Treadway; Stan B Floresco; Jacqueline F McGinty; Suzanne Haber
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2011-07-26       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Dorsal hippocampal involvement in conditioned-response timing and maintenance of temporal information in the absence of the CS.

Authors:  Shu K E Tam; Dómhnall J Jennings; Charlotte Bonardi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  Prospective and retrospective duration memory in the hippocampus: is time in the foreground or background?

Authors:  Christopher J MacDonald
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Time-based reward maximization.

Authors:  Bilgehan Çavdaroğlu; Mustafa Zeki; Fuat Balci
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Impulsive responding on the peak-interval procedure.

Authors:  Matthew S Matell; George S Portugal
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2006-10-04       Impact factor: 1.777

7.  Cell assembly sequences arising from spike threshold adaptation keep track of time in the hippocampus.

Authors:  Vladimir Itskov; Carina Curto; Eva Pastalkova; György Buzsáki
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Timing and space usage are disrupted by amphetamine in rats maintained on DRL 24-s and DRL 72-s schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  Stephen C Fowler; Jonathan Pinkston; Elena Vorontsova
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 9.  The drugs don't work-or do they? Pharmacological and transgenic studies of the contribution of NMDA and GluR-A-containing AMPA receptors to hippocampal-dependent memory.

Authors:  D M Bannerman; J N P Rawlins; M A Good
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2006-05-05       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  A Prefrontal-Hippocampal Comparator for Goal-Directed Behavior: The Intentional Self and Episodic Memory.

Authors:  Robert Numan
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 3.558

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.