Literature DB >> 7964774

Effect of rotation on the radiographic appearance of the femoral canal.

S G Eckrich1, P C Noble, H S Tullos.   

Abstract

Radiographic templating is a key element of preoperative planning for cementless total hip arthroplasty, and it aids in the selection of an appropriate implant. Frequently, the radiographic projection of the proximal femur does not correspond to that of the femoral prosthesis on its template due to variations in patient positioning. This discrepancy is a potential source of error when predicting which femoral component will best fit within the femoral canal. To evaluate the effect of femoral rotation on the size and shape of its radiographic image, anteroposterior and lateral radiographs of 12 femora were prepared over a range of positions. Several medullary canal dimensions were measured for each projection. The changes in these dimensions were compared using the image at neutral rotation as a reference. Each femur was then implanted with an appropriately sized cementless prosthesis to determine its actual rotational orientation in the canal. On the anteroposterior projection, statistically significant changes in the width of the proximal canal with femoral rotation were noted. There was no statistically significant change in distal canal dimensions with rotation. On the lateral projection, the dimensions of the proximal canal changed significantly with internal rotation; however, external rotation had no effect on canal dimensions. In general, the magnitude and direction of the canal dimensions were highly variable. The final rotational orientation of the femoral component in the canal was quite variable with respect to the plane of the femoral neck. Errors in implant selection may be due to excessive reliance on preoperative templating, which can be misleading because of femoral rotation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7964774     DOI: 10.1016/0883-5403(94)90053-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  13 in total

1.  Usefullness of three-dimensional templating software to quantify the contact state between implant and femur in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Daisuke Inoue; Tamon Kabata; Toru Maeda; Yoshitomo Kajino; Kenji Fujita; Kazuhiro Hasegawa; Takashi Yamamoto; Tomoharu Takagi; Takaaki Ohmori; Hiroyuki Tsuchiya
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2015-11-05

2.  Radiograph-based femur morphing method.

Authors:  E M Zanetti; V Crupi; C Bignardi; P M Calderale
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 3.  Surgical treatment options in patients with impaired bone quality.

Authors:  Norman A Johanson; Jody Litrenta; Jay M Zampini; Frederic Kleinbart; Haviva M Goldman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Increased anteversion of press-fit femoral stems compared with anatomic femur.

Authors:  Roger H Emerson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Increase of cortical bone after a cementless long stem in periprosthetic fractures.

Authors:  Eduardo García-Rey; Eduardo García-Cimbrelo; Ana Cruz-Pardos; Rosário Madero
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Influencing factors for the increased stem version compared to the native femur in cementless total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Masanobu Hirata; Yasuharu Nakashima; Takashi Itokawa; Masanobu Ohishi; Taishi Sato; Mio Akiyama; Daisuke Hara; Yukihide Iwamoto
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  [Templating and radiological outcome monitoring for elective total hip arthroplasty. Applied quality management principles for safe patient care].

Authors:  S Kirschner; C Hamann; S Handreka; K P Günther; A Hartmann
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.000

8.  Distribution and outliers of anteversion of short-length cementless stem.

Authors:  Hong-Seok Kim; Young-Kyun Lee; Joo-Hyung Ha; Se Jin Park; Jung-Wee Park; Kyung-Hoi Koo
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2021-11-20       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Acetate templating on digital images is more accurate than computer-based templating for total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Robert Petretta; Jason Strelzow; Nicholas E Ohly; Peter Misur; Bassam A Masri
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Does femoral rotation influence anteroposterior alpha angle, lateral center-edge angle, and medial proximal femoral angle? A pilot study.

Authors:  Shafagh Monazzam; James D Bomar; Mandar Agashe; Harish S Hosalkar
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.