Literature DB >> 23430720

Increase of cortical bone after a cementless long stem in periprosthetic fractures.

Eduardo García-Rey1, Eduardo García-Cimbrelo, Ana Cruz-Pardos, Rosário Madero.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Healing and functional recovery have been reported using an extensively porous-coated stem in Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic fractures; however, loss of cortical bone has been observed when using these stems in revision surgery for aseptic loosening. However, it is unclear whether this bone loss influences subsequent loosening. QUESTION/PURPOSES: We analyze the healing fracture rate and whether the radiographic changes observed around and extensively porous-coated stem used for periprosthetic fractures affect function or loosening.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 35 patients with periprosthetic fractures (20 Vancouver B2 and 15 Vancouver B3). Patients' mean age at surgery was 80 years (range, 51-86 years). No cortical struts were used in this series. We evaluated radiographs for signs of loosening or subsidence. The cortical index and the femoral cortical width were measured at different levels on the immediate pre- and postoperative radiographs and at different periods of followup. The minimum followup was 3 years (mean, 8.3 years; range, 3-17 years).
RESULTS: All fractures had healed, and all stems were clinically and radiographically stable at the end of followup. Nineteen hips showed nonprogressive radiographic subsidence during the first 3 postoperative months without clinical consequences. The cortical index and the lateral and medial cortical thickness increased over time. Increase of femoral cortex thicknesses was greater in cases with moderate preoperative osteoporosis and in cases with stems less than 16 mm in thickness.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest an extensively porous-coated stem for Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic fractures leads to a high rate of union and stable fixation. Cortical index and lateral cortex thickness increased in these patients with periprosthetic fractures. Patients with moderate osteoporosis and those using thin stems showed a major increase in femoral cortex thickness over time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23430720      PMCID: PMC3825912          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-013-2845-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  40 in total

1.  Minimum 10-year-results of extensively porous-coated stems in revision hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  W G Paprosky; N V Greidanus; J Antoniou
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Distal locking stem for revision femoral loosening and peri-prosthetic fractures.

Authors:  Patrice Mertl; Remy Philippot; Philippe Rosset; Henri Migaud; Jacques Tabutin; Denis Van de Velde
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-12-24       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Femoral revision with the Wagner SL revision stem : evaluation of one hundred and twenty-nine revisions followed for a mean of 4.8 years.

Authors:  P Böhm; O Bischel
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Cementless femoral revision arthroplasty of the hip: minimum 5 years followup.

Authors:  J R Moreland; M A Moreno
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Interobserver and intraobserver variation in the assessment of the healing of tibial fractures after intramedullary fixation.

Authors:  D B Whelan; M Bhandari; M D McKee; G H Guyatt; H J Kreder; D Stephen; E H Schemitsch
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2002-01

6.  Treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures following total hip arthroplasty with femoral component revision.

Authors:  Bryan D Springer; Daniel J Berry; David G Lewallen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Intraoperative fracture of the femur in revision total hip arthroplasty with a diaphyseal fitting stem.

Authors:  R M Dominic Meek; Donald S Garbuz; Bassam A Masri; Nelson V Greidanus; Clive P Duncan
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Distal fixation with Wagner revision stem in treating Vancouver type B2 periprosthetic femur fractures in geriatric patients.

Authors:  P S Ko; J J Lam; M K Tio; O B Lee; F K Ip
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  Revision total hip arthroplasty: the limits of fully coated stems.

Authors:  Scott M Sporer; Wayne G Paprosky
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Treatment of Vancouver B3 periprosthetic femur fractures with a fluted tapered stem.

Authors:  Daniel J Berry
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  2 in total

1.  Could Patient Undergwent Surgical Treatment for Periprosthetic Femoral Fracture after Hip Arthroplasty Return to Their Status before Trauma?

Authors:  Long Zheng; Woo-Yong Lee; Deuk-Soo Hwang; Chan Kang; Chang-Kyun Noh
Journal:  Hip Pelvis       Date:  2016-06-30

Review 2.  Osteosynthesis versus revision arthroplasty in Vancouver B2 periprosthetic hip fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  David González-Martín; Luis Enrique Hernández-Castillejo; Mario Herrera-Pérez; José Luis Pais-Brito; Sergio González-Casamayor; Miriam Garrido-Miguel
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 3.693

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.