Literature DB >> 7956636

Evaluation of a subcutaneous glucose sensor out to 3 months in a dog model.

B J Gilligan1, M C Shults, R K Rhodes, S J Updike.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To advance the feasibility of an implantable long-term glucose sensor with bioprotective sensor membranes and test protocols using a somatostatin analog (octreotide). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Implantable sensors were constructed with one of eight bioprotective membranes and screened in vitro for stable response to glucose. Sensors were implanted subcutaneously into nondiabetic mongrel dogs and monitored at 4-min intervals via radiotelemetry. When implanted sensor responses showed evidence of tracking blood glucose after glucagon challenge (8-21 days postimplant), a glucose infusion protocol was used to assess performance. Sensor data were collected every 4 s after octreotide inhibition of endogenous insulin release. Reference plasma glucose samples were taken every 4-10 min.
RESULTS: Preimplant in vitro testing of sensors verified linearity to 33.3 mM glucose and response times to 90% of equilibrium in 2-7 min. Ten implanted sensors tracked glucose for 20-114 days, during which 25 separate glucose infusion studies were conducted. The resulting regression data yielded a mean slope of 0.99 +/- 0.06, an intercept of 0.24 +/- 0.53 mM glucose, and a correlation coefficient 0.98 +/- 0.01. Long-term sensor stability was not judged adequate for clinical application, although two sensors tracked within +/- 15% for 33 and 42 days. In vivo oxygen delivery was shown to affect sensor performance. On explant, two of eight tested bioprotective membranes were found to be biostable and to fully protect the sensor's enzyme membrane. The foreign body capsule was adequately vascularized adjacent to the sensor up to 91 days postimplant. Sensor units eventually failed because of electronic problems (package leakage) or because of biodegradation or biofouling of test bioprotective membranes.
CONCLUSION: Further development of this type of sensor may provide diabetic patients with a better means of monitoring blood glucose.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7956636     DOI: 10.2337/diacare.17.8.882

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Care        ISSN: 0149-5992            Impact factor:   19.112


  21 in total

1.  In vivo glucose sensing for diabetes management: progress towards non-invasive monitoring. Interview by Judy Jones.

Authors:  J Pickup; O Rolinski; D Birch
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-11-13

2.  A percutaneous device to study glucose kinetics in subcutaneous tissue fluid.

Authors:  M Gerritsen; J A Lutterman; J A Jansen
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 3.  Technologies for continuous glucose monitoring: current problems and future promises.

Authors:  Santhisagar Vaddiraju; Diane J Burgess; Ioannis Tomazos; Faquir C Jain; Fotios Papadimitrakopoulos
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2010-11-01

Review 4.  In vitro, in vivo and post explantation testing of glucose-detecting biosensors: current methods and recommendations.

Authors:  Heidi E Koschwanez; William M Reichert
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2007-04-19       Impact factor: 12.479

5.  Species and density of implant surface chemistry affect the extent of foreign body reactions.

Authors:  Ashwin Nair; Ling Zou; Dhiman Bhattacharyya; Richard B Timmons; Liping Tang
Journal:  Langmuir       Date:  2008-01-12       Impact factor: 3.882

Review 6.  Amperometric glucose sensors: sources of error and potential benefit of redundancy.

Authors:  Jessica R Castle; W Kenneth Ward
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2010-01-01

7.  Anti-inflammatory polymeric coatings for implantable biomaterials and devices.

Authors:  Amanda W Bridges; Andrés J García
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2008-11

Review 8.  Biomaterials/tissue interactions: possible solutions to overcome foreign body response.

Authors:  Jacqueline M Morais; Fotios Papadimitrakopoulos; Diane J Burgess
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2010-02-09       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 9.  Biomechanics of the sensor-tissue interface-effects of motion, pressure, and design on sensor performance and the foreign body response-part I: theoretical framework.

Authors:  Kristen L Helton; Buddy D Ratner; Natalie A Wisniewski
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2011-05-01

10.  Integrin-directed modulation of macrophage responses to biomaterials.

Authors:  Toral D Zaveri; Jamal S Lewis; Natalia V Dolgova; Michael J Clare-Salzler; Benjamin G Keselowsky
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 12.479

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.