Literature DB >> 7954176

Differences in the treatment of male and female patients with end-stage renal disease.

C Florakas1, R Wilson, E Toffelmire, M Godwin, R Morton.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether there is a difference in the allocation of types of dialysis to male and female patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD).
DESIGN: Descriptive study.
SETTING: Canada. PATIENTS: All patients registered with the Canadian Organ Replacement Register (CORR) whose treatment began between 1981 and 1991. Data were obtained for 19,732 patients, of whom 18,010 had sufficiently complete data and were being treated with either peritoneal dialysis or hemodialysis 3 months after the diagnosis of ESRD. OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportions of patients receiving peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis according to sex.
RESULTS: Significantly more male (58.1%) than female (50.8%) patients were receiving hemodialysis 3 months after diagnosis (p < 0.00001). Multivariate analysis to control for the possible confounding effects of age, province of treatment, diagnosis, concurrent illness and year of diagnosis did not explain the difference.
CONCLUSIONS: In Canada from 1981 to 1991 male patients were more likely than female patients to receive hemodialysis for the treatment of ESRD. Additional research is needed to explain this finding.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Health Care and Public Health

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7954176      PMCID: PMC1337328     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


  16 in total

1.  Measuring patients' desire for autonomy: decision making and information-seeking preferences among medical patients.

Authors:  J Ende; L Kazis; A Ash; M A Moskowitz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1989 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Race and sex differences in the identification of candidates for renal transplantation.

Authors:  J M Soucie; J F Neylan; W McClellan
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 8.860

3.  Racial, sexual and age inequalities in chronic dialysis.

Authors:  C M Kjellstrand; G M Logan
Journal:  Nephron       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.847

4.  Non-medical factors that impact on ESRD modality selection.

Authors:  A R Nissenson; S S Prichard; I K Cheng; R Gokal; M Kubota; R Maiorca; M C Riella; J Rottembourg; J H Stewart
Journal:  Kidney Int Suppl       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 10.545

5.  Multicenter study of change in dialysis therapy-maintenance hemodialysis to continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  S Singh; J Yium; E Macon; E Clark; D Schaffer; P Teschan
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 8.860

6.  Access to kidney transplantation. Has the United States eliminated income and racial differences?

Authors:  P J Held; M V Pauly; R R Bovbjerg; J Newmann; O Salvatierra
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1988-12

7.  Detection bias in the diagnostic pursuit of lung cancer.

Authors:  C K Wells; A R Feinstein
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  Sex bias in considering coronary bypass surgery.

Authors:  J N Tobin; S Wassertheil-Smoller; J P Wexler; R M Steingart; N Budner; L Lense; J Wachspress
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Dialysis utilization in the Toronto region from 1981 to 1992. Toronto Region Dialysis Committee.

Authors:  D C Mendelssohn; A Chery
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1994-04-01       Impact factor: 8.262

10.  Mortality rates among patients with end-stage renal disease in Canada, 1981-86.

Authors:  J Silins; L Fortier; Y Mao; G Posen; A M Ugnat; A Brancker; L Gaudette; D Wigle
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1989-10-01       Impact factor: 8.262

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Sex or body size? Selection of dialysis type revisited.

Authors:  A Levin
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1999-03-23       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Body size, not sex, is responsible for differences in type of dialysis.

Authors:  C Florakas; M Godwin; R Morton; R Wilson; E Toffelmire
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1999-03-23       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Reflections on supply-demand mismatch in dialysis services in Ontario.

Authors:  N K Choudhry; C D Naylor
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1995-09-01       Impact factor: 8.262

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.