Literature DB >> 1553969

Multicenter study of change in dialysis therapy-maintenance hemodialysis to continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis.

S Singh1, J Yium, E Macon, E Clark, D Schaffer, P Teschan.   

Abstract

Serial prospective observations were made on 40 patients with end-stage renal failure who transferred voluntarily from long-term maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) to continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). Adequate data were available through 6 months on CAPD in 26 participants, whereas 20 completed the study (1 year on CAPD). There were 12 (30%) treatment failures, including two deaths. Standard CAPD (four 2-L exchanges per day) proved to be inadequate therapy in large, young males with low total urea clearances (Ktu) on MHD. There was a large variation in Ktu within MHD and CAPD therapies that employed apparently similar or identical dialysis prescriptions; this underscores the need to quantify dialysis by a measure such as Ktu. Hematocrit, white blood cell (WBC) and platelet counts, and serum bicarbonate levels were significantly higher, whereas blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and serum potassium levels were significantly lower on CAPD than on MHD. While body weight, blood pressure, bone disease, parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels, and lipid profile did not change significantly, nutritional indices tended to decline with time on CAPD. Urea generation rate (Gu) decreased significantly after transfer to CAPD and correlated with Ktu regardless of treatment modality. Central nervous system (CNS) function reflecting uremic symptomatology and as indexed by average quantified electroencephalogram (EEG) discriminant scores did not change significantly. Hospitalization rates and stays were similar during equal time intervals on both therapies. Sufficiently diverse responses followed the MHD to CAPD therapy change to warrant more extended observations on larger numbers of patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1553969     DOI: 10.1016/s0272-6386(13)80005-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis        ISSN: 0272-6386            Impact factor:   8.860


  6 in total

1.  Impact of modality choice on rates of hospitalization in patients eligible for both peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis.

Authors:  Robert R Quinn; Pietro Ravani; Xin Zhang; Amit X Garg; Peter G Blake; Peter C Austin; James M Zacharias; John F Johnson; Sanjay Pandeya; Mauro Verrelli; Matthew J Oliver
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.756

2.  The impact of transfer from hemodialysis on peritoneal dialysis technique survival.

Authors:  Sharon J Nessim; Joanne M Bargman; S Vanita Jassal; Matthew J Oliver; Yingbo Na; Jeffrey Perl
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2013-12-01       Impact factor: 1.756

3.  Clinical outcomes of peritoneal dialysis patients transferred from hemodialysis: a matched case-control study.

Authors:  Li Zhang; Tao Cao; Zhibin Li; Qiong Wen; Jianxiong Lin; Xiaodan Zhang; Qunying Guo; Xiao Yang; Xueqing Yu; Haiping Mao
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 1.756

4.  Differences in the treatment of male and female patients with end-stage renal disease.

Authors:  C Florakas; R Wilson; E Toffelmire; M Godwin; R Morton
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1994-11-01       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Peritoneal Dialysis as a First versus Second Option after Previous Haemodialysis: A Very Long-Term Assessment.

Authors:  Roberto José Barone; María Inés Cámpora; Nélida Susana Gimenez; Liliana Ramirez; Sergio Alberto Panese; Mónica Santopietro
Journal:  Int J Nephrol       Date:  2014-11-20

6.  Hospitalization for Patients on Combination Therapy With Peritoneal Dialysis and Hemodialysis Compared With Hemodialysis.

Authors:  Mototsugu Tanaka; Yoshitaka Ishibashi; Yoshifumi Hamasaki; Yuka Kamijo; Mayumi Idei; Takuya Kawahara; Takahiro Nishi; Michio Takeda; Hiroshi Nonaka; Masaomi Nangaku; Naobumi Mise
Journal:  Kidney Int Rep       Date:  2020-01-23
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.