Literature DB >> 3496029

Sex bias in considering coronary bypass surgery.

J N Tobin, S Wassertheil-Smoller, J P Wexler, R M Steingart, N Budner, L Lense, J Wachspress.   

Abstract

Cardiovascular nuclear medicine exercise studies may serve as a screening method to be used in making decisions to refer patients for catheterization and coronary artery bypass surgery. In a study of 390 patients consecutively referred for nuclear exercise testing, abnormal results found in 31% of the women and in 64% of the men affected physicians' decisions to recommend catheterization in men only; 4% of the women with abnormal radionuclide scans were referred for catheterization compared with 40% of the men (p less than 0.001). this 10:1 ratio was independent of age. A multiple logistic regression analysis that controlled for age, previous myocardial infarction, presence of typical and atypical angina, and abnormal test results yielded an odds ratio of 6.3 for men. The male-to-female ratio of patients with coronary artery disease given abnormal results of a cardiovascular nuclear scan is only 2:1. Thus, the sex differential in decisions to refer patients for cardiac catheterization cannot be explained entirely by differences in the sensitivity of tests or the rates of coronary artery disease; it also cannot be explained by differential benefits from surgery. These findings raise the question of whether coronary artery bypass surgery is underused in women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3496029     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-107-1-19

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  64 in total

1.  Gender Disparities in Preoperative Resource Use for Wrist Arthroscopy.

Authors:  Jessica I Billig; Jennifer M Sterbenz; Lin Zhong; Kevin C Chung
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  Brief report: Gender and total knee/hip arthroplasty utilization rate in the VA system.

Authors:  Sonya Borrero; C Kent Kwoh; Jennifer Sartorius; Said A Ibrahim
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 3.  Paved with good intentions: do public health and human service providers contribute to racial/ethnic disparities in health?

Authors:  Michelle van Ryn; Steven S Fu
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 4.  Differences in clinical communication by gender.

Authors:  V Elderkin-Thompson; H Waitzkin
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Use of care and subsequent mortality: the importance of gender.

Authors:  P Franks; M R Gold; C M Clancy
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Temporal trends in the utilization of diagnostic testing and treatments for cardiovascular disease in the United States, 1993-2001.

Authors:  F L Lucas; Michael A DeLorenzo; Andrea E Siewers; David E Wennberg
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-01-24       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Minimizing disparities in surgical care: a research focus for the future.

Authors:  Joan J Ryoo; Clifford Y Ko
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Physician referral patterns and race differences in receipt of coronary angiography.

Authors:  Thomas A LaVeist; Athol Morgan; Melanie Arthur; Stephen Plantholt; Michael Rubinstein
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  Coronary artery surgery: are women discriminated against?

Authors:  M Petticrew; M McKee; J Jones
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-05-01

10.  Age and gender differences in excitation-contraction coupling of the rat ventricle.

Authors:  N Leblanc; D Chartier; H Gosselin; J L Rouleau
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1998-09-01       Impact factor: 5.182

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.