Literature DB >> 17514365

Comparisons of bone mass measurements on various skeletal sites including quantitative ultrasonography of the calcaneus for assessing age-related losses, their correlations, and diagnostic agreement using the Japanese and WHO criteria for osteoporosis.

Yasushi Imashuku1, Masahiko Takada, Kiyoshi Murata.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare age-related bone losses and correlations among several bone mass measurements and to evaluate diagnostic agreement among them using the Japanese and WHO criteria for osteoporosis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 846 women (mean +/- SD: age 54 +/- 9 years) were evaluated. Bone mineral densities of the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and calcaneus were measured by dual X-ray absorptiometry and distal radius by peripheral computed tomography. Quantitative ultrasonography (QUS) parameters of the calcaneus were also measured. The age-related bone losses after 50 years of age and correlations among bone mass results were evaluated using linear regression analysis. Diagnostic agreement was evaluated by kappa statistics.
RESULTS: The annual losses ranged from 1.0% to 1.6%. The correlation coefficients ranged from 0.54 to 0.78. The kappa scores ranged from 0.52 to 0.30 for all subjects using the Japanese criteria and from 0.38 to 0.15 using the WHO criteria.
CONCLUSION: Bone mass measurements including QUS on various skeletal sites documented age-related changes similarly, and their bone masses correlated moderately. The diagnostic agreements among them were fair to poor. To screen out women with a risk of osteoporosis, it is important to choose which technique to use and which skeletal site to measure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17514365     DOI: 10.1007/s11604-006-0117-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Med        ISSN: 0288-2043


  15 in total

1.  Diagnostic criteria for primary osteoporosis: year 2000 revision.

Authors:  H Orimo; Y Hayashi; M Fukunaga; T Sone; S Fujiwara; M Shiraki; K Kushida; S Miyamoto; S Soen; J Nishimura; Y Oh-Hashi; T Hosoi; I Gorai; H Tanaka; T Igai; H Kishimoto
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Diagnostic agreement of two calcaneal ultrasound devices: the Sahara bone sonometer and the Achilles+.

Authors:  F E Alenfeld; K Engelke; D Schmidt; M Brezger; E Diessel; D Felsenberg
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Evaluation of calcaneus bone densitometry against hip and spine for diagnosis of osteoporosis.

Authors:  E D Williams; T J Daymond
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 4.  Noninvasive assessment of bone mineral and structure: state of the art.

Authors:  H K Genant; K Engelke; T Fuerst; C C Glüer; S Grampp; S T Harris; M Jergas; T Lang; Y Lu; S Majumdar; A Mathur; M Takada
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 6.741

5.  The diagnosis of osteoporosis.

Authors:  J A Kanis; L J Melton; C Christiansen; C C Johnston; N Khaltaev
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  Comparison of bone mineral density at various skeletal sites with quantitative ultrasound parameters of the calcaneus for assessment of vertebral fractures.

Authors:  Y Hamanaka; I Yamamoto; M Takada; R Matsushita; T Ota; I Yuh; R Morita
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.626

7.  Classification of osteoporosis based on bone mineral densities.

Authors:  Y Lu; H K Genant; J Shepherd; S Zhao; A Mathur; T P Fuerst; S R Cummings
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 6.741

8.  Ultrasound bone densitometry of the os calcis in Japanese women.

Authors:  K Yamazaki; K Kushida; A Ohmura; M Sano; T Inoue
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 9.  What are the standards by which bone mass measurement at peripheral skeletal sites should be used in the diagnosis of osteoporosis?

Authors:  Paul D Miller; Christopher F Njeh; Larry G Jankowski; Leon Lenchik
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.963

10.  How reliable is the ultrasound densitometer for community screening to diagnose osteoporosis in spine, femur, and forearm?

Authors:  K I Kim; I K Han; H Kim; N H Cho
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.963

View more
  4 in total

1.  A study on the validity of quantitative ultrasonic measurement used the bone mineral density values on dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in young and in middle-aged or older women.

Authors:  Tadayuki Iida; Chiho Chikamura; Satomi Aoi; Hiromi Ikeda; Yuko Matsuda; Yoshito Oguri; Yuichiro Ono; Kazuhiro Katada; Fumiko Ishizaki
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2010-02-27

2.  Qualitative ultrasonography for bone health: Are we there yet?

Authors:  Vishesh Verma; A S Menon
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2018-07-03

3.  Relationships between endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene polymorphisms and osteoporosis in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Shun-zhi Liu; Hong Yan; Wei-kun Hou; Peng Xu; Juan Tian; Li-fang Tian; Bo-feng Zhu; Jie Ma; She-min Lu
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.066

4.  Diagnostic value of calcaneal quantitative ultrasound in the evaluation of osteoporosis in middle-aged and elderly patients.

Authors:  Changzhou Li; Jifeng Sun; Li Yu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 1.817

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.