Literature DB >> 1481723

Bone mass measurement by DXA: influence of analysis procedures and interunit variation.

C Trevisan1, G G Gandolini, P Sibilla, M Penotti, M P Caraceni, S Ortolani.   

Abstract

Interunit variability among bone densitometers is due to different factors, including different calibration procedures and algorithms and variability in photon source energies and/or intensities. Other factors, such as the choice of scan parameters or the analysis procedures, can also introduce variability. The new generation of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) has partially improved this situation. The aim of this study was to investigate the operator-dependent analysis procedures that can affect scan results and to evaluate the phantom and in vivo interunit variation of some DXA instruments. Four DXA instruments (QDR 1000 and 1000/W, Hologic, Inc.) were used. Potential sources of variability in the analysis procedures of anteroposterior lumbar spine and hip scans were considered: in most cases these procedures significantly influenced scan results. On lumbar spine, an enlargement of the scan window of less than 3 cm was responsible for an average increase in bone mineral density (BMD) of about 3%. On the hip, lowering the scan window by about 1 cm accounted for an increase in the whole-segment BMD of about 4%. After standardization of analysis procedures, interunit and intraunit coefficients of variation and percentage differences among instruments were less than 1% for all the parameters considered (area and bone mineral content and density) with both an anatomic and a geometric phantom, and in nine subjects scanned by two different devices the percentage difference in BMD was greater than 2%. This study shows that present interunit variability allows comparisons among laboratories, but only if highly standardized analysis procedures are used.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1481723     DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.5650071204

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  9 in total

Review 1.  Bone outcomes and technical measurement issues of bone health among children and adolescents: considerations for nutrition and physical activity intervention trials.

Authors:  Jayne A Fulkerson; John H Himes; Simone A French; Sally Jensen; Moira A Petit; Christy Stewart; Mary Story; Kristine Ensrud; Sandy Fillhouer; Kristine Jacobsen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-08-27       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Quality control of DXA instruments in multicenter trials.

Authors:  K G Faulkner; M R McClung
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Quality assurance for bone densitometry research studies.

Authors:  C A Bassett
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  European semi-anthropomorphic spine phantom for the calibration of bone densitometers: assessment of precision, stability and accuracy. The European Quantitation of Osteoporosis Study Group.

Authors:  J Pearson; J Dequeker; M Henley; J Bright; J Reeve; W Kalender; A M Laval-Jeantet; P Rüegsegger; D Felsenberg; J Adams
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Precision of dual X-ray absorptiometry and peripheral computed tomography using mobile densitometry units.

Authors:  M Wapniarz; R Lehmann; O Randerath; S Baedeker; W John; K Klein; B Allolio
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 4.333

6.  Ultrasound measurements on the os calcis in a prospective multicenter study.

Authors:  D Hans; A M Schott; M C Chapuy; M Benamar; P D Kotzki; C Cormier; J M Pouilles; P J Meunier
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 4.333

7.  Radiofrequency echographic multispectrometry compared with dual X-ray absorptiometry for osteoporosis diagnosis on lumbar spine and femoral neck.

Authors:  M Di Paola; D Gatti; O Viapiana; L Cianferotti; L Cavalli; C Caffarelli; F Conversano; E Quarta; P Pisani; G Girasole; A Giusti; M Manfredini; G Arioli; M Matucci-Cerinic; G Bianchi; R Nuti; S Gonnelli; M L Brandi; M Muratore; M Rossini
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Result of Proficiency Test and Comparison of Accuracy Using a European Spine Phantom among the Three Bone Densitometries.

Authors:  Ae Ja Park; Jee-Hye Choi; Hyun Kang; Ki Jeong Park; Ha Young Kim; Seo Hwa Kim; Deog-Yoon Kim; Seung-Hwan Park; Yong-Chan Ha
Journal:  J Bone Metab       Date:  2015-05-31

9.  Precise Prediction of Total Body Lean and Fat Mass From Anthropometric and Demographic Data: Development and Validation of Neural Network Models.

Authors:  Simon Lebech Cichosz; Nicklas Højgaard Rasmussen; Peter Vestergaard; Ole Hejlesen
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2020-11-16
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.