Literature DB >> 30906121

Complications of implant removal in ankle fractures.

Taro Kasai1,2, Takumi Matsumoto1, Toru Iga2, Sakae Tanaka1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although the complications of internal fixation in ankle fractures are well-known in a number of reports, there have been few reports revealing the complications of implant removal in ankle fractures. The aim of this study was to investigate the perioperative complications of implant removal in ankle fractures and analyze the associated factors of such complications.
METHODS: Patients who underwent open reduction and internal fixation using metal implants for ankle fractures and had their implants removed between 2010 and 2015 were enrolled in the study. We investigated the rate and details of perioperative complications and collected information on the possible risk factors including the age, comorbidities, fracture type, number of skin incisions, operative time, and surgeon's grade from the medical charts.
RESULTS: A total of 80 patients were included for analysis. Perioperative complications occurred in 11 patients (14%) including arterial injury in one patient, blistering in three, nerve injuries in three, skin necrosis in two, and infection in two. In patients with perioperative complications, the rate of patients with peripheral vascular disease and multiple skin incision was significantly higher (18% vs 3%, p = 0.031 and 64% vs 32%, p = 0.042, respectively) and the operative time was significantly longer (102 min vs 57 min, p < 0.001) than those without perioperative complications.
CONCLUSION: The indication of implant removal in ankle fractures should be considered carefully, especially in patients with possible risk factors and without implant-related symptoms, due to the high incidence of perioperative complications.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ankle fracture; Complication; Implant removal; Risk factor

Year:  2019        PMID: 30906121      PMCID: PMC6411597          DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2019.02.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop        ISSN: 0972-978X


  20 in total

1.  Complications of metalwork removal.

Authors:  P L Sanderson; W Ryan; P G Turner
Journal:  Injury       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.586

2.  Observations on removal of metal implants.

Authors:  R H Richards; J D Palmer; N M Clarke
Journal:  Injury       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.586

Review 3.  Wound healing in total joint replacement.

Authors:  R E Jones; R D Russell; M H Huo
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 5.082

4.  The benefits of implant removal from the foot and ankle.

Authors:  Ariel A Williams; Daniela M Witten; Rosanna Duester; Loretta B Chou
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Incidence of hardware-related pain and its effect on functional outcomes after open reduction and internal fixation of ankle fractures.

Authors:  O L Brown; D R Dirschl; W T Obremskey
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.512

6.  Operative versus nonoperative treatment of geriatric ankle fractures: a Medicare Part A claims database analysis.

Authors:  Jason T Bariteau; Raymond Y Hsu; Vincent Mor; Yoojin Lee; Christopher W DiGiovanni; Roman Hayda
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 2.827

7.  Removal of painful orthopaedic implants after fracture union.

Authors:  Reuven B Minkowitz; Siraj Bhadsavle; Michael Walsh; Kenneth A Egol
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Risk factors for deep surgical site infection following operative treatment of ankle fractures.

Authors:  Mikko T Ovaska; Tatu J Mäkinen; Rami Madanat; Kaisa Huotari; Tero Vahlberg; Eero Hirvensalo; Jan Lindahl
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Complication rates following open reduction and internal fixation of ankle fractures.

Authors:  Nelson F SooHoo; Lucie Krenek; Michael J Eagan; Barkha Gurbani; Clifford Y Ko; David S Zingmond
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Surgeons' beliefs and perceptions about removal of orthopaedic implants.

Authors:  Beate Hanson; Chris van der Werken; Dirk Stengel
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2008-05-24       Impact factor: 2.362

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Immunological reaction to magnesium-based implants for orthopedic applications. What do we know so far? A systematic review on in vivo studies.

Authors:  Omer Suljevic; Stefan F Fischerauer; Annelie M Weinberg; Nicole G Sommer
Journal:  Mater Today Bio       Date:  2022-06-09

Review 2.  Making Hardware Removal Unnecessary by Using Resorbable Implants for Osteosynthesis in Children.

Authors:  Pascal Heye; Christoph Matissek; Clemens Seidl; Marcell Varga; Tamas Kassai; Gergö Jozsa; Thomas Krebs
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-29

3.  Reduced incidence and economic cost of hardware removal after ankle fracture surgery: a 20-year nationwide registry study.

Authors:  Nikke Partio; Tuomas T Huttunen; Heikki M Mäenpää; Ville M Mattila
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 3.717

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.