Literature DB >> 26245670

[Osteosynthesis of Weber B ankle fractures using the one-third tubular plate and refixation of the syndesmosis].

C Spering1, V Lesche, K Dresing.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Anatomical reconstruction and recovery to complete range of function of the upper ankle joint. Therefore, the most stable but least invasive osteosynthesis is required to enable the patient early functional mobilization. INDICATION: Supination and pronation fracture with luxation mechanism of the upper ankle joint with or without rupture of the syndesmosis. Open fracture of the distal fibula including displaced and instable fractures. CONTRAINDICATION: Severe peripheral arterial occlusive disease; contaminated open fractures (≥ 2nd degree); pediatric fractures with open epiphyseal plate. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Supine position with ipsilateral slightly elevated hip and knee. Incision of about 8 cm length along the dorsal edge of the distal fibula. When reaching the lateral malleolus, a slight ventral angulation is necessary. Open reduction through this posterolateral approach. Secure the reposition using an interfragmentary lag screw and anatomically adjusted third tubular plate. Followed by a revision of the syndesmosis and transfixation using a tricortical position screw. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Mobilization on day 1 after surgery with reduced weight-bearing when position screw is not applied; when position screw is implanted with ground contact for 6 weeks. Removal of position screw under local anesthesia after 6 weeks and pain-controlled full weight-bearing. Removal of metal after 1.5 years.
RESULTS: Open reduction using the third tubular plate and an interfragmentary lag screw through a dorsolateral approach used in 90 % of all Weber B fractures in our clinic. Additional revision of a ruptured syndesmosis performed in 70 % and transfixation through a position screw in 40 %. Persisting instability in the upper ankle joint significantly reduced after surgical treatment compared to a conservative approach. Revisions necessary in 3.7 % of patients and pseudarthrosis diagnosed in 0.9 %. It has been shown that the preoperative x-ray and clinical examination is limited in detecting a ruptured syndesmosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26245670     DOI: 10.1007/s00064-015-0412-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol        ISSN: 0934-6694            Impact factor:   1.154


  14 in total

1.  Conservative versus operative treatment for displaced ankle fractures in patients over 55 years of age. A prospective, randomised study.

Authors:  N K Makwana; B Bhowal; W M Harper; A W Hui
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2001-05

2.  Diagnosing syndesmotic instability in ankle fractures.

Authors:  Michel Pj van den Bekerom
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2011-07-18

3.  Removal of internal fixation--the effect on patients' complaints: a study of 66 cases of removal of internal fixation after malleolar fractures.

Authors:  S Jacobsen; M Honnens de Lichtenberg; C M Jensen; C Tørholm
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 2.827

4.  Predictors of functional outcome following transsyndesmotic screw fixation of ankle fractures.

Authors:  Brad Weening; Mohit Bhandari
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.512

5.  Adult ankle fractures--an increasing problem?

Authors:  C M Court-Brown; J McBirnie; G Wilson
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1998-02

6.  Syndesmotic fixation in supination-external rotation ankle fractures: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Tero H J Kortekangas; Harri J Pakarinen; Olli Savola; Jaakko Niinimäki; Sannamari Lepojärvi; Pasi Ohtonen; Tapio Flinkkilä; Jukka Ristiniemi
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 2.827

Review 7.  [Evidence for treatment of acute syndesmosis injuries in sports].

Authors:  R Best; F Mauch; G Bauer
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.000

8.  Do type B malleolar fractures need a positioning screw?

Authors:  D Heim; V Schmidlin; O Ziviello
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.586

9.  Outcome after unstable ankle fracture: effect of syndesmotic stabilization.

Authors:  Kenneth A Egol; Brian Pahk; Michael Walsh; Nirmal C Tejwani; Roy I Davidovitch; Kenneth J Koval
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.512

10.  Determinants of outcome in operatively and non-operatively treated Weber-B ankle fractures.

Authors:  E M Van Schie-Van der Weert; E M M Van Lieshout; M R De Vries; M Van der Elst; T Schepers
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2011-09-30       Impact factor: 3.067

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  [Operative treatment of bimalleolar fractures].

Authors:  Sabine Ochman; Michael J Raschke
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 1.154

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.