Literature DB >> 7950040

Prompting physicians for cost-effective test ordering in the low prevalence conditions of family medicine.

R M Bernstein1, G R Hollingworth, W E Wood.   

Abstract

We have developed a computerized prompting system for test ordering which we feel will decrease the cost of investigations and at the same time promote an evidence based learning approach to test ordering. Prompting systems have been shown to be cost-effective but suffer from many disadvantages in the family practice setting. They tend to be difficult to modify by the user and contingent on an inflexible rule based structure. Many suggestions are ignored implying that they are not relevant. In family practice most conditions are of low prevalence. Prompting for test ordering where the pre-test likelihood of disease is small will result in a large number of false positives and many unnecessary repeat or confirmatory investigations and attendant anxiety unless the prompting system is specifically designed to be used in a low prevalence environment. PROMPTOR-FM (PRObabilistic Method of Prompting for Test ORdering in Family Medicine) was developed to overcome these perceived difficulties. It allows the physician to rapidly calculate the positive and negative predictive values of a test being considered based on the clinical index of suspicion. The physician is able to repeat the calculations and compare the results with previous calculations. By using PROMPTOR-FM repetitively, the clinician can learn to balance the risk of "missing" a rare but serious condition against the risk of falsely identifying disease with its downstream hazards and costs of further investigation. Prompting for test ordering is therefore uniquely tailored to each patient's situation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7950040      PMCID: PMC2247721     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care        ISSN: 0195-4210


  9 in total

1.  Evidence-based medicine. A new approach to teaching the practice of medicine.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1992-11-04       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Computer predictions of abnormal test results. Effects on outpatient testing.

Authors:  W M Tierney; C J McDonald; S L Hui; D K Martin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1988-02-26       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  A randomized trial of computerized reminders for blood pressure screening in primary care.

Authors:  I McDowell; C Newell; W Rosser
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Medical records that guide and teach.

Authors:  L L Weed
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1968-03-14       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Computerized display of past test results. Effect on outpatient testing.

Authors:  W M Tierney; C J McDonald; D K Martin; M P Rogers
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Reminders to physicians from an introspective computer medical record. A two-year randomized trial.

Authors:  C J McDonald; S L Hui; D M Smith; W M Tierney; S J Cohen; M Weinberger; G P McCabe
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Protocol-based computer reminders, the quality of care and the non-perfectability of man.

Authors:  C J McDonald
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1976-12-09       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Canadian National Breast Screening Study: 1. Breast cancer detection and death rates among women aged 40 to 49 years.

Authors:  A B Miller; C J Baines; T To; C Wall
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1992-11-15       Impact factor: 8.262

9.  Computerized reminders to encourage cervical screening in family practice.

Authors:  I McDowell; C Newell; W Rosser
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 0.493

  9 in total
  3 in total

1.  Readers' response and author's reply to "Laboratory results that should be ignored".

Authors:  Giuseppe Lippi; Gian Cesare Guidi
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2006

Review 2.  Laboratory results that should be ignored.

Authors:  Dirk M Elston
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2006-10-11

3.  Prompting for cost-effective test ordering: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  G R Hollingworth; R M Bernstein; G S Viner; J S Remington; W E Wood
Journal:  Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care       Date:  1995
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.