Literature DB >> 7943482

Presumptive eligibility for pregnant Medicaid enrollees: its effects on prenatal care and perinatal outcome.

J M Piper1, E F Mitchel, W A Ray.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: "Presumptive eligibility" permits pregnant prospective Medicaid enrollees to obtain services during the application period. The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of presumptive eligibility on the receipt of prenatal care and the occurrence of low-birthweight births and neonatal, perinatal, and infant mortality.
METHODS: Outcome rates for pregnant women who enrolled in Tennessee Medicaid in the 6-month period before presumptive eligibility was enacted were compared with those obtained for pregnant women who enrolled in the 6-month period after presumptive eligibility had been in effect for 5 months.
RESULTS: Women in the "after" group were 40% more likely to enroll and 30% more likely to obtain prenatal care in the first trimester. They were 300% more likely to fill a prescription for prenatal vitamins in the first trimester and 16% more likely to have begun prenatal care before the third trimester. However, they were similar to those enrolling in the "before" time period in terms of the occurrence of adverse perinatal outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: When barriers to prenatal care, including bureaucratic ones, are removed, low-income women will seek care earlier and more frequently.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7943482      PMCID: PMC1615092          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.84.10.1626

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  8 in total

1.  Effects of Medicaid eligibility expansion on prenatal care and pregnancy outcome in Tennessee.

Authors:  J M Piper; W A Ray; M R Griffin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1990-11-07       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Use of Medicaid data for pharmacoepidemiology.

Authors:  W A Ray; M R Griffin
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Methodological issues in evaluating expanded Medicaid coverage for pregnant women.

Authors:  J M Piper; W A Ray; M R Griffin; R Fought; J R Daughtery; E Mitchel
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Validation of 1989 Tennessee birth certificates using maternal and newborn hospital records.

Authors:  J M Piper; E F Mitchel; M Snowden; C Hall; M Adams; P Taylor
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1993-04-01       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  The differential effect of prenatal care on the incidence of low birth weight among blacks and whites in a prepaid health care plan.

Authors:  J L Murray; M Bernfield
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1988-11-24       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Access to prenatal care following major Medicaid eligibility expansions.

Authors:  P Braveman; T Bennett; C Lewis; S Egerter; J Showstack
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993-03-10       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  The impact of prenatal care in different social groups.

Authors:  R S Greenberg
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1983-04-01       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  The effect of providing health coverage to poor uninsured pregnant women in Massachusetts.

Authors:  J S Haas; I S Udvarhelyi; C N Morris; A M Epstein
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993-01-06       Impact factor: 56.272

  8 in total
  12 in total

1.  Improvements in prenatal insurance coverage and utilization of care in California: an unsung public health victory.

Authors:  Diane R Rittenhouse; Paula Braveman; Kristen Marchi
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2003-06

2.  Determinants of late prenatal care initiation by African American women in Washington, DC.

Authors:  Allan A Johnson; M Nabil El-Khorazaty; Barbara J Hatcher; Barbara K Wingrove; Renee Milligan; Cynthia Harris; Leslie Richards
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2003-06

3.  Prenatal care need and access: a GIS analysis.

Authors:  Sara McLafferty; Sue Grady
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.460

4.  Improved birth outcomes among HIV-infected women with enhanced Medicaid prenatal care.

Authors:  B J Turner; C J Newschaffer; J Cocroft; T R Fanning; S Marcus; W W Hauck
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 5.  Mainstreaming nutrition in maternal, newborn and child health: barriers to seeking services from existing maternal, newborn, child health programmes.

Authors:  Peter K Streatfield; Tracey P Koehlmoos; Nurul Alam; Malay K Mridha
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.092

6.  Birth outcomes and the effectiveness of prenatal care.

Authors:  G G Liu
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Medicaid Disenrollment Patterns Among Children Coming into Contact with Child Welfare Agencies.

Authors:  Ramesh Raghavan; Benjamin T Allaire; Derek S Brown; Raven E Ross
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2016-06

8.  Racial differences in prenatal care use in the United States: are disparities decreasing?

Authors:  Greg R Alexander; Michael D Kogan; Sara Nabukera
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Predictors of infant mortality among college-educated black and white women, Davidson County, Tennessee, 1990-1994.

Authors:  A O Scott-Wright; R M Wrona; T M Flanagan
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 1.798

10.  Leveraging The Affordable Care Act To Enroll Justice-Involved Populations In Medicaid: State And Local Efforts.

Authors:  Sachini N Bandara; Haiden A Huskamp; Lauren E Riedel; Emma E McGinty; Daniel Webster; Robert E Toone; Colleen L Barry
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 6.301

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.