Literature DB >> 6682290

The impact of prenatal care in different social groups.

R S Greenberg.   

Abstract

An analysis of United States birth certificate records for the calendar year 1977 indicated that women who failed to seek prenatal care were at increased risk of delivery of a low-birth weight infant, even after social factors were considered. However, the strength of association, as well as the population impact, between antenatal care and birth weight varied by social group. Prenatal care had the greatest observed impact for socially disadvantaged women, because of their high overall risk of delivery of low-birth weight infants. From these observations, it appears that the efficacy of antenatal services is modified by social situation. As a result, summary evaluations of prenatal care impact may underestimate the true value of these services for certain social groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6682290     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(83)90681-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  29 in total

1.  Prenatal care use among selected Asian American groups.

Authors:  S M Yu; G R Alexander; R Schwalberg; M D Kogan
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Risk factors for late or no prenatal care following Medicaid expansions in California.

Authors:  M Nothnagle; K Marchi; S Egerter; P Braveman
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2000-12

3.  Poor antenatal care in 20 French districts: risk factors and pregnancy outcome.

Authors:  B Blondel; B Marshall
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.710

4.  Primary care case management and birth outcomes in the Iowa Medicaid program.

Authors:  E D Schulman; D J Sheriff; E T Momany
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Reduced risk of low weight births among indigent women receiving care from nurse-midwives.

Authors:  P F Visintainer; J Uman; K Horgan; A Ibald; U Verma; N Tejani
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.710

6.  Association between maternal occupational status and utilization of antenatal care Study based on the perinatal survey of Baden-Wuerttemberg 1998-2003.

Authors:  Elisabeth Simoes; Siegfried Kunz; Ralf Münnich; Friedrich Wilhelm Schmahl
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2005-09-01       Impact factor: 3.015

7.  Black/white differences in prenatal care utilization: an assessment of predisposing and enabling factors.

Authors:  T A LaVeist; V M Keith; M L Gutierrez
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Racial and ethnic disparities in the discordance between women's assessment of the timing of their prenatal care entry and the first trimester standard.

Authors:  R Sarnoff; E Adams
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2001-09

9.  Evaluation of the effects of the North Carolina Improved Pregnancy Outcome Project: implications for state-level decision-making.

Authors:  M D Peoples; R C Grimson; G L Daughtry
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  The relationship of prenatal care and pregnancy complications to birthweight in Winnipeg, Canada.

Authors:  C A Mustard; N P Roos
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 9.308

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.