Literature DB >> 12870626

Determinants of late prenatal care initiation by African American women in Washington, DC.

Allan A Johnson1, M Nabil El-Khorazaty, Barbara J Hatcher, Barbara K Wingrove, Renee Milligan, Cynthia Harris, Leslie Richards.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to identify the determinants of late prenatal care (PNC) initiation among minority women in Washington, DC.
METHODS: DC-resident, African American women (n = 303) were recruited at 14 PNC facilities, representing the various types of PNC facilities located in DC: 4 hospital-based clinics, 5 community-based clinics, and 5 private practices. The women were interviewed at their first prenatal care visits to determine their perceptions of 63 barriers, motivators and facilitators influencing PNC initiation; substance use; and sociodemographic background. PNC initiation was classified as early (prior to the 20th week of gestation) or late (after the 20th week of gestation). The responses of women who initiated PNC early versus late were compared using bivariate and multivariate statistical procedures. Classification and Regression Trees analysis was used to identify groups at risk of late initiation.
RESULTS: Variables contributing to late PNC initiation included maternal age not between 20 and 29 years, unemployment, no history of previous abortions, consideration of abortion, lack of money to pay for PNC, and no motivation to learn how to protect ones health. Three risk groups for late PNC initiation included 1) women consideringabortion and not employed outside their homes; 2) women not considering abortion who had no previous abortion experience; and 3) teenagers not considering abortion and with no previous abortions.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicate that psychosocial barriers are more important than structural barriers. Of the psychosocial barriers, the major determinants of late PNC initiation were consideration of abortion and previous abortion experience.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12870626     DOI: 10.1023/a:1023816927045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Matern Child Health J        ISSN: 1092-7875


  33 in total

1.  Factors associated with adolescents' risk for late entry into prenatal care.

Authors:  C M Wiemann; A B Berenson; L G Pino; S L McCombs
Journal:  Fam Plann Perspect       Date:  1997 Nov-Dec

2.  Initiation of prenatal care by low-income Hispanic women in Houston.

Authors:  T L Byrd; P D Mullen; B J Selwyn; R Lorimor
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1996 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.792

3.  Barriers to implementation of a prenatal care program for low income women.

Authors:  C L Miller; L H Margolis; B Schwethelm; S Smith
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Barriers to prenatal care in Mecklenburg County. A study of 500 women.

Authors:  K U Boggs; J McLeod; T M Stubbs
Journal:  N C Med J       Date:  1995-04

5.  Pregnant teenagers' reasons for seeking or delaying prenatal care.

Authors:  S H Lee; L M Grubbs
Journal:  Clin Nurs Res       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 2.075

6.  Repeat abortions in Canada, 1975-1993.

Authors:  W J Millar; S Wadhera; S K Henshaw
Journal:  Fam Plann Perspect       Date:  1997 Jan-Feb

7.  Social network structure and prenatal care utilization.

Authors:  P A St Clair; V L Smeriglio; C S Alexander; D D Celentano
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Drinking among subgroups in the adult population of New York State: a classification analysis using CART.

Authors:  G M Barnes; J W Welte; B Dintcheff
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol       Date:  1991-07

9.  Adolescent girls' attitudes toward contraceptive subdermal implants.

Authors:  S M Dabrow; C L Merrick; M Conlon
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 5.012

Review 10.  Maternal demographic, situational and psychosocial factors and their relationship to enrollment in prenatal care: a review of the literature.

Authors:  R L Goldenberg; E T Patterson; M P Freese
Journal:  Women Health       Date:  1992
View more
  15 in total

1.  Prenatal care need and access: a GIS analysis.

Authors:  Sara McLafferty; Sue Grady
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  Determinants of the use of prenatal care in rural China: the role of care content.

Authors:  Bright I Nwaru; Zhuochun Wu; Elina Hemminki
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2012-01

3.  Perinatal disparities for black mothers and their newborns.

Authors:  Ian M Paul; Erik B Lehman; Alawia K Suliman; Marianne M Hillemeier
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2007-08-22

4.  How racial and ethnic groupings may mask disparities: the importance of separating Pacific Islanders from Asians in prenatal care data.

Authors:  Clea C Sarnquist; Erin Moix Grieb; Yvonne A Maldonado
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2009-07-07

5.  The Black and White of infant back sleeping and infant bed sharing in Florida, 2004-2005.

Authors:  Danielle L Broussard; William M Sappenfield; David A Goodman
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2012-04

Review 6.  Racial/ethnic disparities in obstetric outcomes and care: prevalence and determinants.

Authors:  Allison S Bryant; Ayaba Worjoloh; Aaron B Caughey; A Eugene Washington
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  When homogeneity meets heterogeneity: the geographically weighted regression with spatial lag approach to prenatal care utilization.

Authors:  Carla Shoff; Vivian Yi-Ju Chen; Tse-Chuan Yang
Journal:  Geospat Health       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.212

8.  Predictors of inadequate prenatal care in methamphetamine-using mothers in New Zealand and the United States.

Authors:  Min Wu; Linda L Lagasse; Trecia A Wouldes; Amelia M Arria; Tara Wilcox; Chris Derauf; Elana Newman; Rizwan Shah; Lynne M Smith; Charles R Neal; Marilyn A Huestis; Sheri Dellagrotta; Barry M Lester
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2013-04

9.  Explaining ethnic differences in late antenatal care entry by predisposing, enabling and need factors in The Netherlands. The Generation R Study.

Authors:  A A Choté; G T Koopmans; W K Redekop; C J M de Groot; R J Hoefman; V W V Jaddoe; A Hofman; E A P Steegers; J P Mackenbach; M Trappenburg; M Foets
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2011-08

10.  Barriers to women's participation in inter-conceptional care: a cross-sectional analysis.

Authors:  Vijaya K Hogan; M Ahinee Amamoo; Althea D Anderson; David Webb; Leny Mathews; Diane Rowley; Jennifer F Culhane
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.