Literature DB >> 8416413

The effect of providing health coverage to poor uninsured pregnant women in Massachusetts.

J S Haas1, I S Udvarhelyi, C N Morris, A M Epstein.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: There has been substantial policy interest in whether the provision of health coverage to poor uninsured pregnant women affects access to prenatal care and birth outcomes. We therefore examined whether the statewide provision of health coverage to uninsured low-income pregnant women affects access to prenatal care and infant birth outcomes.
DESIGN: Natural experiment. PATIENTS: All in-hospital, single-gestation live births in 1984 (N = 57,257) and 1987 (N = 64,346). INTERVENTION: In 1985, Massachusetts instituted Healthy Start, a program providing health coverage to uninsured pregnant women with incomes below 185% of the federal poverty level. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Rates of satisfactory prenatal care, care initiated before the third trimester, and adverse infant outcome for uninsured women and for two concurrent control groups, women with Medicaid, and women with private insurance. We calculated the difference in rates between the uninsured and each concurrent control. To assess the effect of the program, we examined the change in these interpayer differences in rates between 1984 and 1987. MAIN
RESULTS: Between 1984 and 1987, the rate of satisfactory prenatal care declined from 96.4% to 93.8% for all women in Massachusetts (P < .001). There was no statewide change in the overall incidence of adverse birth outcome (6.6% in both years). In 1984, uninsured women were less likely than privately insured women to receive satisfactory prenatal care (90.5% and 98.1%, respectively; interpayer difference, -7.6%) and to initiate care before the third trimester (94.2% and 99.1%; interpayer difference, -4.9%), and were more likely to suffer an adverse birth outcome (7.1% and 5.8%; interpayer difference, 1.3%). Between 1984 and 1987, there were no statistically significant changes in the interpayer differences in rates for any of the outcome measures relative to either control group.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that access to prenatal care may have declined for all women in Massachusetts between 1984 and 1987. In the setting of this statewide decline in access, the expansion of health coverage to uninsured low-income pregnant women was not associated with an improvement in access to prenatal care or birth outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8416413

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  25 in total

1.  Changes in prenatal care timing and low birth weight by race and socioeconomic status: implications for the Medicaid expansions for pregnant women.

Authors:  L Dubay; T Joyce; R Kaestner; G M Kenney
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Improvements in prenatal insurance coverage and utilization of care in California: an unsung public health victory.

Authors:  Diane R Rittenhouse; Paula Braveman; Kristen Marchi
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2003-06

3.  Delays and unmet need for health care among adult primary care patients in a restructured urban public health system.

Authors:  Allison L Diamant; Ron D Hays; Leo S Morales; Wesley Ford; Daphne Calmes; Steven Asch; Naihua Duan; Eve Fielder; Sehyun Kim; Jonathan Fielding; Gerald Sumner; Martin F Shapiro; David Hayes-Bautista; Lillian Gelberg
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Improved birth outcomes among HIV-infected women with enhanced Medicaid prenatal care.

Authors:  B J Turner; C J Newschaffer; J Cocroft; T R Fanning; S Marcus; W W Hauck
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Medicaid coverage and medical interventions during pregnancy.

Authors:  Leo Turcotte; John Robst; Solomon Polachek
Journal:  Int J Health Care Finance Econ       Date:  2005-09

6.  Prenatal care initiation among very low-income women in the aftermath of welfare reform: does pre-pregnancy Medicaid coverage make a difference?

Authors:  Deborah Rosenberg; Arden Handler; Kristin M Rankin; Meagan Zimbeck; E Kathleen Adams
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2006-06-09

7.  The effect of expanding Medicaid prenatal services on birth outcomes.

Authors:  L M Baldwin; E H Larson; F A Connell; D Nordlund; K C Cain; M L Cawthon; P Byrns; R A Rosenblatt
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 8.  The role of diversity in the health care needs of California.

Authors:  M V Drake; D H Lowenstein
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1998-05

9.  Selection bias in prenatal care use by Medicaid recipients.

Authors:  Janice F Bell; Frederick J Zimmerman
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2003-12

10.  The adequacy of prenatal care and incidence of low birthweight among the poor in Washington State and British Columbia.

Authors:  S J Katz; R W Armstrong; J P LoGerfo
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 9.308

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.