Literature DB >> 7942864

The exclusion of pregnant, pregnable, and once-pregnable people (a.k.a. women) from biomedical research.

V Merton1.   

Abstract

The barriers to women's participation as subjects in biomedical research are currently being challenged as a matter of legislative policy, medicine, and law. This Article catalogs the ways in which women have been disadvantaged by their exclusion and recent developments to redress them, and goes on to dissect the underlying rationales for excluding women from clinical trials. The author reveals the 'fundamental misconception' behind exclusionary rationales, and argues that research sponsors in fact have more to fear in the way of potential liability from the exclusion of women, even pregnant women and women of child-bearing capacity, than from their inclusion. Finally, the Article suggests strategies for achieving reform of these exclusionary practices.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Legal Approach; National Institutes of Health

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 7942864

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Law Med        ISSN: 0098-8588


  10 in total

1.  Factors Affecting Women's Autonomous Decision Making In Research Participation Amongst Yoruba Women Of Western Nigeria.

Authors:  Chitu Womehoma Princewill; Ayodele S Jegede; Karin Nordström; Bolatito Lanre-Abass; Bernice Simone Elger
Journal:  Dev World Bioeth       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 2.294

2.  Disadvantaged, Outnumbered, and Discouraged: Women's Experiences as Healthy Volunteers in U.S. Phase I Trials.

Authors:  Nupur Jain; Marci D Cottingham; Jill A Fisher
Journal:  Crit Public Health       Date:  2018-10-10

3.  Perceptions of clinical research participation among African American women.

Authors:  Yolanda R Smith; Angela M Johnson; Lisa A Newman; Ardeth Greene; Timothy R B Johnson; Juliet L Rogers
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.681

4.  Scientific research and the public trust.

Authors:  David B Resnik
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2010-08-29       Impact factor: 3.525

5.  IRB Decision-Making about Minimal Risk Research with Pregnant Participants.

Authors:  Amina White; Christine Grady; Margaret Little; Kristen Sullivan; Katie Clark; Monalisa Ngwu; Anne Drapkin Lyerly
Journal:  Ethics Hum Res       Date:  2021-09

6.  The Lake Wobegon effect: are all cancer patients above average?

Authors:  Jacqueline H Wolf; Kevin S Wolf
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.911

7.  The perils of protection: vulnerability and women in clinical research.

Authors:  Toby Schonfeld
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2013-06

Review 8.  Safety and toxicity of sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine: implications for malaria prevention in pregnancy using intermittent preventive treatment.

Authors:  Philip J Peters; Michael C Thigpen; Monica E Parise; Robert D Newman
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 5.606

9.  Best strategies to recruit and enroll elderly Blacks into clinical and biomedical research.

Authors:  Lennox A Graham; Julius Ngwa; Oyonumo Ntekim; Oludolapo Ogunlana; Saba Wolday; Steven Johnson; Megan Johnson; Chimene Castor; Thomas V Fungwe; Thomas O Obisesan
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 4.458

10.  'Experimental pregnancy' revisited.

Authors:  Anne Drapkin Lyerly
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2022-07-20
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.