BACKGROUND: Recruiting minority women into clinical research remains a significant challenge to conducting ethnically representative research. The main objective of this Office on Women's Health, DHHS-funded e-health database evaluation project was to examine African American women 's thoughts and perceptions about the clinical research process and about participation in the University of Michigan Women's Health Registry research database. METHODS: Thirty-one African American women were recruited from the community to participate in a total of five 90-minute focus group discussions. All sessions were audiotaped and transcribed verbatim. Thematic content analysis was used to identify relevant themes about participation in clinical research and the Women's Health Registry. RESULTS: Ten common trends were identified. (1) Information about the Women's Health Registry is not reaching the community. (2) Research is perceived as biased to benefit Caucasians. (3) Community involvement by the research team is critical for trust to develop. (4) Research directly relevant to African Americans or their community will encourage participation. (5) Researchers should use existing networks and advertise in appropriate locations. (6) The community needs more information concerning research. (7) Compensation is important. (8) Research that addresses a personal or family medical problem encourages involvement. (9) Minority representation on the research team is a motivator to participation. (10) There is limited time for healthcare-related activities. CONCLUSIONS: Successful recruitment strategies for African American women should feature community-based, culturally appropriate approaches. Online research databases for subject recruitment will likely be successful only if implemented within a broader community-oriented program.
BACKGROUND: Recruiting minority women into clinical research remains a significant challenge to conducting ethnically representative research. The main objective of this Office on Women's Health, DHHS-funded e-health database evaluation project was to examine African American women 's thoughts and perceptions about the clinical research process and about participation in the University of Michigan Women's Health Registry research database. METHODS: Thirty-one African American women were recruited from the community to participate in a total of five 90-minute focus group discussions. All sessions were audiotaped and transcribed verbatim. Thematic content analysis was used to identify relevant themes about participation in clinical research and the Women's Health Registry. RESULTS: Ten common trends were identified. (1) Information about the Women's Health Registry is not reaching the community. (2) Research is perceived as biased to benefit Caucasians. (3) Community involvement by the research team is critical for trust to develop. (4) Research directly relevant to African Americans or their community will encourage participation. (5) Researchers should use existing networks and advertise in appropriate locations. (6) The community needs more information concerning research. (7) Compensation is important. (8) Research that addresses a personal or family medical problem encourages involvement. (9) Minority representation on the research team is a motivator to participation. (10) There is limited time for healthcare-related activities. CONCLUSIONS: Successful recruitment strategies for African American women should feature community-based, culturally appropriate approaches. Online research databases for subject recruitment will likely be successful only if implemented within a broader community-oriented program.
Authors: Jennifer Hays; Julie R Hunt; F Allan Hubbell; Garnet L Anderson; Marian Limacher; Catherine Allen; Jacques E Rossouw Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 3.797
Authors: Annette Patterson; Helen Davis; David Euhus; Susan Neuhausen; Louise Strong; Gail Tomlinson Journal: Breast J Date: 2005 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.431
Authors: M Killien; J A Bigby; V Champion; E Fernandez-Repollet; R D Jackson; M Kagawa-Singer; K Kidd; M J Naughton; M Prout Journal: J Womens Health Gend Based Med Date: 2000-12
Authors: Garnet L Anderson; Marian Limacher; Annlouise R Assaf; Tamsen Bassford; Shirley A A Beresford; Henry Black; Denise Bonds; Robert Brunner; Robert Brzyski; Bette Caan; Rowan Chlebowski; David Curb; Margery Gass; Jennifer Hays; Gerardo Heiss; Susan Hendrix; Barbara V Howard; Judith Hsia; Allan Hubbell; Rebecca Jackson; Karen C Johnson; Howard Judd; Jane Morley Kotchen; Lewis Kuller; Andrea Z LaCroix; Dorothy Lane; Robert D Langer; Norman Lasser; Cora E Lewis; JoAnn Manson; Karen Margolis; Judith Ockene; Mary Jo O'Sullivan; Lawrence Phillips; Ross L Prentice; Cheryl Ritenbaugh; John Robbins; Jacques E Rossouw; Gloria Sarto; Marcia L Stefanick; Linda Van Horn; Jean Wactawski-Wende; Robert Wallace; Sylvia Wassertheil-Smoller Journal: JAMA Date: 2004-04-14 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Mona N Fouad; Giselle Corbie-Smith; David Curb; Barbara V Howard; Charles Mouton; Michael Simon; Greg Talavera; Joanice Thompson; Ching-Yun Wang; Cornelia White; Rosalie Young Journal: Control Clin Trials Date: 2004-08
Authors: Jacques E Rossouw; Garnet L Anderson; Ross L Prentice; Andrea Z LaCroix; Charles Kooperberg; Marcia L Stefanick; Rebecca D Jackson; Shirley A A Beresford; Barbara V Howard; Karen C Johnson; Jane Morley Kotchen; Judith Ockene Journal: JAMA Date: 2002-07-17 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Malika Roman Isler; Andre L Brown; Natalie Eley; Allison Mathews; Kendra Batten; Randy Rogers; Noah Powell; Caressa White; Rosalee Underwood; Kathleen M MacQueen Journal: Prog Community Health Partnersh Date: 2014
Authors: Nancy E Reame; Jane L Lukacs; Vasantha Padmanabhan; Aimee D Eyvazzadeh; Yolanda R Smith; Jon-Kar Zubieta Journal: Menopause Date: 2008 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Patchareeya P Kwan; Greta Briand; Cevadne Lee; Jonathan Tana Lepule; Jane Ka'ala Pang; Melanie Sabado; Lola Sablan-Santos; Dorothy Schmidt-Vaivao; Sora Tanjasiri; Vanessa Tui'one; Paula H Palmer Journal: Health Promot Pract Date: 2014-01-06
Authors: Michele Peake Andrasik; Christian Chandler; Borris Powell; Damon Humes; Steven Wakefield; Katharine Kripke; Daniel Eckstein Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2014-02-13 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Paula M Frew; Matthew Archibald; Dazon Dixon Diallo; Su-I Hou; Takeia Horton; Kayshin Chan; Mark J Mulligan; Carlos del Rio Journal: Prev Sci Date: 2010-06
Authors: Claudia E Bambs; Kevin E Kip; Suresh R Mulukutla; Aryan N Aiyer; Cheryl Johnson; Lee Ann McDowell; Karen Matthews; Steven E Reis Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2013-03-25 Impact factor: 3.797