Literature DB >> 32123487

Disadvantaged, Outnumbered, and Discouraged: Women's Experiences as Healthy Volunteers in U.S. Phase I Trials.

Nupur Jain1, Marci D Cottingham2, Jill A Fisher3.   

Abstract

While enormous strides have been made in the representation of women in clinical trials, the percentage of women enrolling in Phase I trials still remains low, which both raises public health concerns about the safety of new drugs and social justice concerns regarding their inclusion in research. As part of a longitudinal study of healthy volunteers in the United States, our inquiry aimed to examine impediments to women enrolling in Phase I trials as well as their experiences participating in these studies at residential research clinics. We analyzed 111 semi-structured interviews conducted with 47 women who had enrolled in at least one Phase I trial. Our study indicates that women face discrimination during all stages of their participation in Phase I trials from their ability to qualify for studies, the treatment they receive in the clinic facilities, and a lack of social support. Specifically, we found that (1) study designs disadvantage participants of childbearing potential, (2) women feel vulnerable in the clinic space when outnumbered by men, and (3) heterosexual women are often discouraged from participation by their husbands or significant others. Placing these findings within the scholarly literature on barriers to women's clinical trial participation, we argue that diverse strategies attending both to physiological and social factors are needed to combat inequalities in U.S. Phase I trial participation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical trial inclusion; discrimination; gender inequality; healthy volunteers; women

Year:  2018        PMID: 32123487      PMCID: PMC7050919          DOI: 10.1080/09581596.2018.1529861

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Public Health        ISSN: 0958-1596


  22 in total

1.  Does sex make a difference?

Authors:  Linda Bren
Journal:  FDA Consum       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug

2.  Gender bias in research: how does it affect evidence based medicine?

Authors:  Anita Holdcroft
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 3.  Trends in risks associated with new drug development: success rates for investigational drugs.

Authors:  J A DiMasi; L Feldman; A Seckler; A Wilson
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2010-02-03       Impact factor: 6.875

4.  Representation of Women and Minorities in Clinical Trials for New Molecular Entities and Original Therapeutic Biologics Approved by FDA CDER from 2013 to 2015.

Authors:  Alice Chen; Hilary Wright; Hawi Itana; Merina Elahi; Ayomide Igun; Guoxing Soon; Anne R Pariser; Emmanuel O Fadiran
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 2.681

5.  Gender-specific Regulatory Challenges to Product Approval: a panel discussion.

Authors:  Alyson J McGregor; Helen Barr; Marna R Greenberg; Basmah Safdar; Peter Wildgoose; David W Wright; Judd E Hollander
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 3.451

6.  Risk and Emotion Among Healthy Volunteers in Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Marci D Cottingham; Jill A Fisher
Journal:  Soc Psychol Q       Date:  2016-07-29

7.  Feeding and Bleeding: The Institutional Banalization of Risk to Healthy Volunteers in Phase I Pharmaceutical Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Jill A Fisher
Journal:  Sci Technol Human Values       Date:  2015-03-01

8.  Motherhood preconceived: the emergence of the Preconception Health and Health Care Initiative.

Authors:  Miranda R Waggoner
Journal:  J Health Polit Policy Law       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 2.265

9.  Healthy Volunteers' Perceptions of the Benefits of Their Participation in Phase I Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Jill A Fisher; Lisa McManus; Megan M Wood; Marci D Cottingham; Julianne M Kalbaugh; Torin Monahan; Rebecca L Walker
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2018-10-08       Impact factor: 1.742

10.  Twenty years and still counting: including women as participants and studying sex and gender in biomedical research.

Authors:  Carolyn M Mazure; Daniel P Jones
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 2.809

View more
  4 in total

1.  Gendered Logics of Biomedical Research: Women in U.S. Phase I Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Marci D Cottingham; Jill A Fisher
Journal:  Soc Probl       Date:  2020-10-11

2.  Paying for Fairness? Incentives and Fair Subject Selection.

Authors:  Douglas MacKay; Rebecca L Walker
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 11.229

3.  Healthy volunteers in US phase I clinical trials: Sociodemographic characteristics and participation over time.

Authors:  Corey A Kalbaugh; Julianne M Kalbaugh; Lisa McManus; Jill A Fisher
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-09-07       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Analysis of the reasons for screening failure in phase I clinical trials in China: a retrospective study of the clinical trials screening process.

Authors:  Bin Li; Qian Zhang; Yuanyuan Liu; Xiaolei Zhang; Dongmei Cheng; Aolin Li; Yubing Chen; Xingyu Zhu; Yue Su; Huan Zhou
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-10
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.