Literature DB >> 7942665

Low-cost, office-based, screening colonoscopy.

J D Rogge1, M F Elmore, S J Mahoney, E D Brown, F P Troiano, D R Wagner, D J Black, D C Pound.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Performing full colonoscopy at regular intervals and removing lesions at an early stage might significantly lower the incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer. Such a program must be inexpensive, safe, and time-efficient.
METHODS: Screening colonoscopy was performed on 639 patients. For a normal examination, the physician's time is limited to giving the medication for conscious sedation, performing the colonoscopy, and completing a written report form. The total charge for a normal screening colonoscopy is $150.
RESULTS: Adenomatous and/or hyperplastic polyps were detected in 218 patients (34.1%). One hundred sixty adenomatous and 134 hyperplastic polyps were removed. Forty-eight percent (48.1%) of the adenomatous and 21.6% of the hyperplastic polyps were above the sigmoid colon. Six adenocarcinomas were detected in five patients. One patient had a delayed bleeding episode requiring no transfusion or therapeutic intervention, and one patient had a "post-polypectomy syndrome" requiring no therapeutic intervention. The average physician time in the endoscopy room for normal examinations was 18 min.
CONCLUSIONS: Screening colonoscopy can be safely performed in an office facility. Physician time with the patient should be limited to allow a low cost that compares favorably with screening costs for other malignancies. Long-term studies to assess the capability of screening colonoscopy to lower mortality from colorectal cancer should continue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7942665

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  10 in total

Review 1.  Antagonist: population based endoscopic screening for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  D A L Macafee; J H Scholefield
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Quality indicators for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Douglas K Rex; Philip S Schoenfeld; Jonathan Cohen; Irving M Pike; Douglas G Adler; M Brian Fennerty; John G Lieb; Walter G Park; Maged K Rizk; Mandeep S Sawhney; Nicholas J Shaheen; Sachin Wani; David S Weinberg
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 10.864

3.  Flexible sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy as a screening modality for colorectal adenomas in older age groups? Findings in a cohort of the normal population aged 63-72 years.

Authors:  E Thiis-Evensen; G S Hoff; J Sauar; B M Majak; M H Vatn
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  The cost-effectiveness of CT colonography in screening for colorectal neoplasia.

Authors:  Sandeep Vijan; Inku Hwang; John Inadomi; Roy K H Wong; J Richard Choi; John Napierkowski; Jonathan M Koff; Perry J Pickhardt
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-12-11       Impact factor: 10.864

5.  A prospective analysis of 13,580 colonoscopies. Reevaluation of credentialing guidelines.

Authors:  S D Wexner; J E Garbus; J J Singh
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-02-06       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Quality indicators for colorectal cancer screening for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Philip S Schoenfeld; Jonathan Cohen
Journal:  Tech Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2013-04

7.  Management of the malignant polyp.

Authors:  Marcela Ramirez; Steven Schierling; Harry T Papaconstantinou; J Scott Thomas
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2008-11

8.  Screening colonoscopy for colorectal cancer in asymptomatic people: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yaron Niv; Rachel Hazazi; Zohar Levi; Gerald Fraser
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2008-05-08       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  Differences in detection rates of adenomas and serrated polyps in screening versus surveillance colonoscopies, based on the new hampshire colonoscopy registry.

Authors:  Joseph C Anderson; Lynn F Butterly; Martha Goodrich; Christina M Robinson; Julia E Weiss
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2013-05-06       Impact factor: 11.382

Review 10.  Colorectal Cancer Screening in Average Risk Populations: Evidence Summary.

Authors:  Jill Tinmouth; Emily T Vella; Nancy N Baxter; Catherine Dubé; Michael Gould; Amanda Hey; Nofisat Ismaila; Bronwen R McCurdy; Lawrence Paszat
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-08-14
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.