Literature DB >> 11344424

A prospective analysis of 13,580 colonoscopies. Reevaluation of credentialing guidelines.

S D Wexner1, J E Garbus, J J Singh.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aims of this study were to assess the safety and efficacy of surgeons performing colonoscopy, and to use the results to reevaluate currently available credentialing guidelines.
METHODS: A prospective outcomes study was designed to include all members of the Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES). End points were related to the efficacy and safety of colonoscopy. Credentialing guidelines were reviewed.
RESULTS: Between April 1998 and September 1999 13,580 colonoscopies were prospectively entered into a database. The most common indications were rectal bleeding, colonic polyps, and change in bowel habits. The colonoscopy was normal or revealed only diverticulosis or nonspecific inflammation in 8,473 (62.4%), lower gastrointestinal bleeding in 4 (0.03%), polyps in 4,645 (34.2%), and tumors in 458 (3.4%) patients. The most common biopsy methods for polyps or tumors were the snare (n = 1,728; 34%), the hot (n = 1,600; 31%), and the cold (n = 1,340; 22%) procedures. The colonoscopy was complete in 12,495 cases (92%), requiring a mean procedure time of 22.7 min (range, 1-170 min). Intraprocedural complications included arrhythmia (n = 14; 0.1%), bradycardia (n = 115; 0.8%), hypotension (n = 171; 1.2%), and hypoxia (n = 806; 5.6%). Postprocedural complications were seen in 27 patients (0.2%). Bleeding (n = 10; 0.07%) was managed by observation alone (n = 9; 0.06%) and repeat colonoscopy with transfusion (n = 1; 0.01%). Perforation (n = 10; 0.07%) was treated successfully by observation with conservative management (n = 5; 0.05%) and surgery (n = 5; 0.05%); severe abdominal pain (n = 4; 0.03%) was managed by observation and conservative therapy; and bronchospasm (n = 2; 0.015%) was managed by observation and supportive care. One single mortality (0.007%) was that of a 70-year-old man with a massive lower gastrointestinal hemorrhage who had a cardiac arrest in the recovery room following colonoscopy. The complication rate was not significantly associated statistically with either the level of experience or the number of prior or annual colonoscopies. However, prior colonoscopic experience did have an impact on the completion rate (p < 0.001) and was inversely proportional to the time to completion (p < 0.001). Similarly, the number of annual colonoscopies affected the completion rate and was inversely correlated with the time to completion (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: This large prospective outcomes study showed that colonoscopy performed by surgeons can be rapidly and successfully done with acceptably low morbidity and mortality. There was no association between experience and complications. However, a minimum of 50 prior colonoscopies and 100 annual colonoscopies were associated with a significant improvement in the rate of completion. There was also a significant correlation between both prior and ongoing annual experience and the time required for the examination. No minimum number of cases can be mandated for credentialing to perform "safe" colonoscopies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11344424     DOI: 10.1007/s004640080147

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  68 in total

1.  Complications of flexible fiberoptic colonoscopy and polypectomy.

Authors:  B H Rogers; S E Silvis; O T Nebel; C Sugawa; P Mandelstam
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  Colonoscopy.

Authors:  J S Barthel; J B Marshall
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 3.  Complications and hazards of gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Authors:  A Habr-Gama; J D Waye
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1989 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Endoscopy training during general surgery residency.

Authors:  J M Cosgrove; J R Cohen; R B Wait; I B Margolis
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1995-10

Review 5.  Complications of endoscopic polypectomy.

Authors:  A M Vernava; W E Longo
Journal:  Surg Oncol Clin N Am       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 3.495

6.  Complications in colonoscopic polypectomy: lessons to learn from an experience with 1576 polyps.

Authors:  S Nivatvongs
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 0.688

7.  Complications of fiberoptic gastrointestinal endoscopy--five years' experience in a central hospital.

Authors:  O Reiertsen; J Skjøtø; C D Jacobsen; A R Rosseland
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 10.093

8.  Impact of sedation and resident teaching on complications of colonoscopy.

Authors:  S Galandiuk; P Ahmad
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.588

9.  Towards safer colonoscopy: a report on the complications of 5000 diagnostic or therapeutic colonoscopies.

Authors:  F A Macrae; K G Tan; C B Williams
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 23.059

10.  Colonoscopic impaction in left colon strictures resulting in right colon pneumatic perforation.

Authors:  F A Luchette; R J Doerr; K Kelly; M Kulaylat; R M Stephan; J M Hassett
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1992 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  73 in total

1.  Principles of privileging and credentialing for endoscopy and colonoscopy.

Authors:  S D Wexner; G M Eisen; C Simmang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-01-17       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Guidelines for granting of privileges for gastrointestinal endoscopy: focus on outcomes not number of procedures performed.

Authors:  L W Traverso
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-01-17       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Splenic rupture: a case of massive hemoperitoneum following therapeutic colonoscopy.

Authors:  Daniel Murariu; Sarah Takekawa; Nancy Furumoto
Journal:  Hawaii Med J       Date:  2010-06

4.  Colonoscopy: why are general surgeons being excluded?

Authors:  A Mehran; P Jaffe; J Efron; A Vernava; M A Liberman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-10-23       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Management of colorectal cancers.

Authors:  R Lewis; A Flynn; M E Dean; A Melville; A Eastwood; A Booth
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2004-10

6.  Global Assessment of Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Skills (GAGES): a valid measurement tool for technical skills in flexible endoscopy.

Authors:  Melina C Vassiliou; Pepa A Kaneva; Benjamin K Poulose; Brian J Dunkin; Jeffrey M Marks; Riadh Sadik; Gideon Sroka; Mehran Anvari; Klaus Thaler; Gina L Adrales; Jeffrey W Hazey; Jenifer R Lightdale; Vic Velanovich; Lee L Swanstrom; John D Mellinger; Gerald M Fried
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  Adverse events in older patients undergoing colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lukejohn W Day; Annette Kwon; John M Inadomi; Louise C Walter; Ma Somsouk
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 9.427

8.  CT colonography with fecal tagging after incomplete colonoscopy.

Authors:  S Gryspeerdt; P Lefere; M Herman; R Deman; L Rutgeerts; G Ghillebert; F Baert; M Baekelandt; B Van Holsbeeck
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-02-09       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  The quality of screening colonoscopies in an office-based endoscopy clinic.

Authors:  Douglas Bair; Joe Pham; M Bianca Seaton; Naveen Arya; Michelle Pryce; Trevor L Seaton
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.522

10.  Annual colonoscopy volume and maintenance of competency for surgeons.

Authors:  David Pace; Mark Borgaonkar; Brad Evans; Curtis Marcoux; Muna Lougheed; Vanessa Falk; Nikita Hickey; Meghan O'Leary; Jerry McGrath; Darrel Boone
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.