Literature DB >> 7941424

Analysis of stereothresholds for stimuli below 2.5 c/deg.

L L Kontsevich1, C W Tyler.   

Abstract

We analyze published data on disparity detection thresholds for a wide range of conditions. This type of detection changes behavior dramatically at the spatial frequency of 2.5 c/deg; above this frequency threshold remains constant while below it threshold grows at a uniform rate. Many other types of threshold, such as upper disparity limits for depth perception and threshold amplitudes for stereo and monocular motion, show similar behavior. These data lead to the postulate that there are no foveal stereo channels peaking below 2.5 c/deg, so that foveal stimuli in the whole range below 2.5 c/deg are processed by a single channel tuned to this frequency. Consequently, disparity detection thresholds at frequencies below this frequency are controlled by the single parameter of effective contrast in the 2.5 c/deg channel, whose output depends jointly on the contrast and spatial frequency of the stimuli. We develop this idea to explain the relations between spatial and contrast tuning functions for disparity thresholds. To validate our conclusions, we describe an experiment with difference-of-Gaussian stimuli over a range of interocular widths and contrast differences. For a dichoptic width ratio of 2:1, the dichoptic contrast ratio required to minimize disparity detection thresholds was 1:4, just as predicted by the model.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7941424     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(94)90110-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  10 in total

1.  Contrast gain control in the visual cortex: monocular versus binocular mechanisms.

Authors:  A M Truchard; I Ohzawa; R D Freeman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-04-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Contrast gain-control in stereo depth and cyclopean contrast perception.

Authors:  Fang Hou; Chang-Bing Huang; Ju Liang; Yifeng Zhou; Zhong-Lin Lu
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-01-01       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Binocular combination of phase and contrast explained by a gain-control and gain-enhancement model.

Authors:  Jian Ding; Stanley A Klein; Dennis M Levi
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Variation of stereothreshold with random-dot stereogram density.

Authors:  Liat Gantz; Harold E Bedell
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.973

5.  Push-pull training reduces foveal sensory eye dominance within the early visual channels.

Authors:  Jingping P Xu; Zijiang J He; Teng Leng Ooi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-06-13       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Transfer of perceptual learning of depth discrimination between local and global stereograms.

Authors:  Liat Gantz; Harold E Bedell
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Paradoxical psychometric functions ("swan functions") are explained by dilution masking in four stimulus dimensions.

Authors:  Daniel H Baker; Tim S Meese; Mark A Georgeson
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2013-01-02

8.  Effect of Interocular Contrast Difference on Stereopsis in Observers With Sensory Eye Dominance.

Authors:  Chao Han; Zijiang J He; Teng Leng Ooi
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Apparent sharpness of 3D video when one eye's view is more blurry.

Authors:  Alan Robinson; Ankit Jain; Mathew Scott; Don Macleod; Truong Nguyen
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2013-08-28

10.  On Sensory Eye Dominance Revealed by Binocular Integrative and Binocular Competitive Stimuli.

Authors:  Chao Han; Zijiang J He; Teng Leng Ooi
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 4.799

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.