Literature DB >> 23397038

Binocular combination of phase and contrast explained by a gain-control and gain-enhancement model.

Jian Ding1, Stanley A Klein, Dennis M Levi.   

Abstract

We investigated suprathreshold binocular combination, measuring both the perceived phase and perceived contrast of a cyclopean sine wave. We used a paradigm adapted from Ding and Sperling (2006, 2007) to measure the perceived phase by indicating the apparent location (phase) of the dark trough in the horizontal cyclopean sine wave relative to a black horizontal reference line, and we used the same stimuli to measure perceived contrast by matching the binocular combined contrast to a standard contrast presented to one eye. We found that under normal viewing conditions (high contrast and long stimulus duration), perceived contrast is constant, independent of the interocular contrast ratio and the interocular phase difference, while the perceived phase shifts smoothly from one eye to the other eye depending on the contrast ratios. However, at low contrasts and short stimulus durations, binocular combination is more linear and contrast summation is phase-dependent. To account for phase-dependent contrast summation, we incorporated a fusion remapping mechanism into our model, using disparity energy to shift the monocular phases towards the cyclopean phase in order to align the two eyes' images through motor/sensory fusion. The Ding-Sperling model with motor/sensory fusion mechanism gives a reasonable account of the phase dependence of binocular contrast combination and can account for either the perceived phase or the perceived contrast of a cyclopean sine wave separately; however it requires different model parameters for the two. However, when fit to both phase and contrast data simultaneously, the Ding-Sperling model fails. Incorporating interocular gain enhancement into the model results in a significant improvement in fitting both phase and contrast data simultaneously, successfully accounting for both linear summation at low contrast energy and strong nonlinearity at high contrast energy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23397038      PMCID: PMC4521337          DOI: 10.1167/13.2.13

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  45 in total

1.  Short-latency disparity vergence in humans.

Authors:  C Busettini; E J Fitzgibbon; F A Miles
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Measurement and modeling of center-surround suppression and enhancement.

Authors:  J Xing; D J Heeger
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Effects of nonius line and fusion lock parameters on fixation disparity.

Authors:  M T Ukwade
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 1.973

4.  Measuring, estimating, and understanding the psychometric function: a commentary.

Authors:  S A Klein
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-11

5.  Computational evidence for a rivalry hierarchy in vision.

Authors:  Hugh R Wilson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-11-11       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

7.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies.

Authors:  D G Pelli
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

8.  Vergence eye movements in response to binocular disparity without depth perception.

Authors:  G S Masson; C Busettini; F A Miles
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-09-18       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Spatial remapping in the primate visual system.

Authors:  W Richards
Journal:  Kybernetik       Date:  1968-04

10.  Monocular versus binocular visual acuity.

Authors:  F W Campbell; D G Green
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1965-10-09       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  28 in total

1.  Binocular combination in abnormal binocular vision.

Authors:  Jian Ding; Stanley A Klein; Dennis M Levi
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Rebalancing binocular vision in amblyopia.

Authors:  Jian Ding; Dennis M Levi
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2014-01-12       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Binocular combination of luminance profiles.

Authors:  Jian Ding; Dennis M Levi
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Binocular contrast summation and inhibition depends on spatial frequency, eccentricity and binocular disparity.

Authors:  Concetta F Alberti; Peter J Bex
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2018-09-16       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  A unified model for binocular fusion and depth perception.

Authors:  Jian Ding; Dennis M Levi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2020-12-21       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Assessing binocular interaction in amblyopia and its clinical feasibility.

Authors:  MiYoung Kwon; Zhong-Lin Lu; Alexandra Miller; Melanie Kazlas; David G Hunter; Peter J Bex
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Binocular combination of second-order stimuli.

Authors:  Jiawei Zhou; Rong Liu; Yifeng Zhou; Robert F Hess
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Binocular contrast discrimination needs monocular multiplicative noise.

Authors:  Jian Ding; Dennis M Levi
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Sensory eye balance in surgically corrected intermittent exotropes with normal stereopsis.

Authors:  Lixia Feng; Jiawei Zhou; Li Chen; Robert F Hess
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  Bilateral symmetry in vision and influence of ocular surgical procedures on binocular vision: A topical review.

Authors:  Samuel Arba Mosquera; Shwetabh Verma
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2016-03-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.