Literature DB >> 7940685

Cyclosporine pharmacokinetics and variability from a microemulsion formulation--a multicenter investigation in kidney transplant patients.

J M Kovarik1, E A Mueller, J B van Bree, S S Flückiger, H Lange, B Schmidt, W H Boesken, A E Lison, K Kutz.   

Abstract

The steady-state pharmacokinetics and tolerability of a microemulsion formulation of cyclosporine (Sandimmune Neoral) were compared with the commercial formulation (Sandimmune) in 55 clinically stable renal allograft recipients. In study period I (2 weeks' duration), patients entered the study on a stable, individualized twice-daily dosage regimen of the commercial formulation. In period II (2 weeks), they were changed over to the microemulsion formulation at the same dose as at study entry. In period III (2 weeks), dose titration was subsequently allowed if necessary to provide comparable steady-state trough concentrations as at study entry. The commercial formulation was reinstituted during period IV (2 weeks). Safety and tolerability were assessed at weekly clinic visits, and the steady-state pharmacokinetics of cyclosporine in whole blood were characterized at the end of each study period. A milligram-to-milligram dose conversion was adequate when making the initial change between formulations in order to maintain steady-state trough concentrations in the target therapeutic range. Concomitant with this conversion, the steady-state peak concentration and area under the curve increased on average by 59% and 30%, respectively, due to absorption-related differences between the formulations. These increases were not associated with an increase in adverse experiences or changes in blood pressure or clinical laboratory parameters over the first four weeks after the change-over. Trough concentrations were more stable and were more strongly correlated with systemic exposure (area under the curve) during treatment with the microemulsion formulation. Intraindividual coefficients of variation in steady-state peak concentration, time to attain the peak, area under the curve, and percent peak-trough fluctuation ranged from 18% to 74% from the commercial formulation. Variability from the microemulsion formulation was significantly less, ranging from 10% to 22%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7940685

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  20 in total

Review 1.  The use of therapeutic drug monitoring to optimise immunosuppressive therapy.

Authors:  S M Tsunoda; F T Aweeka
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  A nonlinear mixed-effects pharmacokinetic model comparing two formulations of cyclosporine in stable renal transplant patients.

Authors:  W M Sallas; J R Nedelman; L B Sheiner; J A Meligeni; W T Robinson
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1995-10

3.  Maintenance pharmacological immunosuppressive strategies in renal transplantation.

Authors:  J P Vella; M H Sayegh
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 4.  Therapeutic drug monitoring in pediatric renal transplantation.

Authors:  Lutz T Weber
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2014-04-25       Impact factor: 3.714

5.  Population pharmacokinetic model to predict steady-state exposure to once-daily cyclosporin microemulsion in renal transplant recipients.

Authors:  Franziska Schädeli; Hans-Peter Marti; Felix J Frey; Dominik E Uehlinger
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 6.447

6.  Maximum a posteriori Bayesian estimation of oral cyclosporin pharmacokinetics in patients with stable renal transplants.

Authors:  Frédéric Leger; Jean Debord; Yann Le Meur; Annick Rousseau; Mathias Büchler; Gérard Lachâtre; Gilles Paintaud; Pierre Marquet
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 6.447

7.  The risk of coronary artery disease after heart transplantation is increased in patients receiving low-dose cyclosporine, regardless of blood cyclosporine levels.

Authors:  A Gamba; F Mamprin; R Fiocchi; M Senni; G Troise; P Ferrazzi; R Ferrara; G Corbetta
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.882

Review 8.  A new microemulsion formulation of cyclosporin: pharmacokinetic and clinical features.

Authors:  S Friman; L Bäckman
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 6.447

9.  Quality of life improvement in treatment of psoriasis with intermittent short course cyclosporin (Neoral).

Authors:  M S Salek; A Y Finlay; J J C Lewis; M I Sumner
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 10.  Potential clinical implications of substitution of generic cyclosporine formulations for cyclosporine microemulsion (Neoral) in transplant recipients.

Authors:  Atholl Johnston; Philip Belitsky; Ulrich Frei; John Horvath; Peter Hoyer; J Harold Helderman; Michael Oellerich; Stephen Pollard; Hany Riad; Paolo Rigotti; Paul Keown; Björn Nashan
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2004-06-17       Impact factor: 2.953

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.