Literature DB >> 11825098

Maximum a posteriori Bayesian estimation of oral cyclosporin pharmacokinetics in patients with stable renal transplants.

Frédéric Leger1, Jean Debord, Yann Le Meur, Annick Rousseau, Mathias Büchler, Gérard Lachâtre, Gilles Paintaud, Pierre Marquet.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop a maximum a posteriori probability (MAP) Bayesian estimator for the pharmacokinetics of oral cyclosporin, based on only three timepoints, and evaluate its performance with respect to a full-profile nonlinear regression approach. PATIENTS: 20 adult patients with stable renal transplants given orally administered microemulsified cyclosporin and mycophenolate.
METHODS: Cyclosporin was assayed by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Nonlinear regression and MAP Bayesian estimation were performed using a home-made program and a previously designed pharmacokinetic model including an S-shaped absorption profile described by a gamma distribution. OUTCOME MEASURES AND
RESULTS: MAP Bayesian estimation using the best limited sampling strategy (before administration, and 1 and 3 hours after administration) was compared with nonlinear regression (taken as the reference method) for the prediction of the different pharmacokinetic parameters and exposure indices. Median relative prediction error was -0.49 and -3.42% for area under the concentration-time curve over the administration interval of 12 hours (AUC12) and estimated peak drug concentration (Cmax), respectively (nonsignificant). Relative precision was 2.00 and 4.32%, and correlation coefficient (r) was 0.985 and 0.955, for AUC12 and Cmax, respectively.
CONCLUSION: This paper reports preliminary results in a stable renal transplant patient population, showing that MAP Bayesian estimation can allow accurate prediction of AUC12 and Cmax with only three samples (0, 1 and 3 hours). Although these results require confirmation by further studies in other clinical settings, using other drug combinations, other analytical methods and commercially available pharmacokinetic software, the method seems promising as a tool for the therapeutic drug monitoring of cyclosporin in clinical practice or for exposure-controlled studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11825098     DOI: 10.2165/00003088-200241010-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet        ISSN: 0312-5963            Impact factor:   6.447


  24 in total

1.  Application of a gamma model of absorption to oral cyclosporin.

Authors:  J Debord; E Risco; M Harel; Y Le Meur; M Büchler; G Lachâtre; C Le Guellec; P Marquet
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 2.  Optimization of cyclosporine therapy with new therapeutic drug monitoring strategies: report from the International Neoral TDM Advisory Consensus Meeting (Vancouver, November 1997).

Authors:  P Keown; B D Kahan; A Johnston; G Levy; S P Dunn; F Cittero; J M Grino; P F Hoyer; P Wolf; P F Halloran
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 1.066

3.  A prospective study of cyclosporine concentration in relation to its therapeutic effect and toxicity after renal transplantation.

Authors:  A Lindholm; R Dahlqvist; G G Groth; F Sjöqvist
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  Reduced inter- and intraindividual variability in cyclosporine pharmacokinetics from a microemulsion formulation.

Authors:  J M Kovarik; E A Mueller; J B van Bree; W Tetzloff; K Kutz
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 3.534

Review 5.  Lake Louise Consensus Conference on cyclosporin monitoring in organ transplantation: report of the consensus panel.

Authors:  M Oellerich; V W Armstrong; B Kahan; L Shaw; D W Holt; R Yatscoff; A Lindholm; P Halloran; K Gallicano; K Wonigeit
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 3.681

6.  The relationship between cyclosporine pharmacokinetic parameters and subsequent acute rejection in renal transplant recipients.

Authors:  B L Kasiske; K Heim-Duthoy; K V Rao; W M Awni
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 7.  Methods for clinical monitoring of cyclosporin in transplant patients.

Authors:  R J Dumont; M H Ensom
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 6.447

8.  Comparison of 2- and 3-compartment models for the Bayesian estimation of methotrexate pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  C Sabot; J Debord; B Roullet; P Marquet; L Merle; G Lachatre
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 1.366

9.  Bayesian pharmacokinetic estimation of vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer patients.

Authors:  C Sabot; P Marquet; J Debord; N Carpentier; L Merle; G Lachâtre
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 2.953

10.  Cyclosporine monitoring in renal transplantation: area under the curve monitoring is superior to trough-level monitoring.

Authors:  J Grevel; M S Welsh; B D Kahan
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.681

View more
  12 in total

1.  Modelling ciclosporin double-peak absorption profiles in the early post-transplantation period.

Authors:  Annick Rousseau; Pierre Marquet
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  Bayesian estimation of cyclosporin exposure for routine therapeutic drug monitoring in kidney transplant patients.

Authors:  Hélène Bourgoin; Gilles Paintaud; Matthias Büchler; Yvon Lebranchu; Elisabeth Autret-Leca; France Mentré; Chantal Le Guellec
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 3.  Predicting and preventing adverse drug reactions in the very old.

Authors:  Louis Merle; Marie-Laure Laroche; Thierry Dantoine; Jean-Pierre Charmes
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.923

4.  Pharmacokinetic study of tacrolimus in cystic fibrosis and non-cystic fibrosis lung transplant patients and design of Bayesian estimators using limited sampling strategies.

Authors:  Franck Saint-Marcoux; Christiane Knoop; Jean Debord; Philippe Thiry; Annick Rousseau; Marc Estenne; Pierre Marquet
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 5.  Pharmacokinetic optimization of immunosuppressive therapy in thoracic transplantation: part I.

Authors:  Caroline Monchaud; Pierre Marquet
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 6.447

6.  Patient characteristics influencing ciclosporin pharmacokinetics and accurate Bayesian estimation of ciclosporin exposure in heart, lung and kidney transplant patients.

Authors:  Franck Saint-Marcoux; Pierre Marquet; Evelyne Jacqz-Aigrain; Nicole Bernard; Philippe Thiry; Yann Le Meur; Annick Rousseau
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 6.447

7.  Population pharmacokinetics and Bayesian estimation of mycophenolic acid concentrations in stable renal transplant patients.

Authors:  Chantal Le Guellec; Hélène Bourgoin; Matthias Büchler; Yann Le Meur; Yvon Lebranchu; Pierre Marquet; Gilles Paintaud
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 8.  Population pharmacokinetics of cyclosporine in transplant recipients.

Authors:  Kelong Han; Venkateswaran C Pillai; Raman Venkataramanan
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 4.009

9.  Limited sampling strategies using Bayesian estimation or multilinear regression for cyclosporin AUC(0-12) monitoring in cardiac transplant recipients over the first year post-transplantation.

Authors:  C Monchaud; A Rousseau; F Leger; O J David; J Debord; T Dantoine; P Marquet
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2003-03-06       Impact factor: 2.953

10.  Revisiting myocardial necrosis biomarkers: assessment of the effect of conditioning therapies on infarct size by kinetic modelling.

Authors:  David Ternant; Fabrice Ivanes; Fabrice Prunier; Nathan Mewton; Theodora Bejan-Angoulvant; Gilles Paintaud; Michel Ovize; Denis Angoulvant
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.