Literature DB >> 8882300

A new microemulsion formulation of cyclosporin: pharmacokinetic and clinical features.

S Friman1, L Bäckman.   

Abstract

Cyclosporin (cyclosporin A) has been used as an immunosuppressive agent after organ transplantation for more than 15 years. The bioavailability of cyclosporin in its conventional oral formulation 'Sandimmun' displays considerable inter- and intra-patient variability. Absorption is also bile dependent. Recently, a new galenic formulation of cyclosporin was introduced, 'Neoral', which is a water-free microemulsion of cyclosporin. The microemulsion creates micelles which are absorbed in the small bowel without the presence of bile. Pharmacokinetic studies in healthy volunteers clearly demonstrate an increased bioavailability of the microemulsion formulation of cyclosporin, measured as an increase in maximum drug concentration (Cmax) and area under the drug concentration-time curve, and a reduced time to Cmax. These findings have been confirmed in kidney, liver and heart transplant recipients. With the microemulsion formulation, an improved prediction of cyclosporin concentrations has probably attributed to the decrease found in the variability of cyclosporin absorption. This could probably enable easier and more reliable monitoring of cyclosporin concentrations after transplantation. So far, data on the effects of conversion from the conventional to the microemulsion formulation of cyclosporin are only available in a limited number of patients and with a limited follow-up period. The main questions are related to what the long term consequences of the improved bioavailability of the microemulsion formulation will be. Further long term studies are needed in order to answer these questions. In the present review, we report on the pharmacokinetic properties of, and on clinical experience after solid organ and bone marrow transplantation with, the microemulsion formulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8882300     DOI: 10.2165/00003088-199630030-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet        ISSN: 0312-5963            Impact factor:   6.447


  48 in total

1.  Safety and tolerability of a new oral formulation of cyclosporin A, Sandimmun Neoral, in renal transplant patients.

Authors:  S Taesch; D Niese
Journal:  Transpl Int       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.782

2.  Improvement of peroral absorption of cyclosporine A by microemulsions.

Authors:  W A Ritschel; S Adolph; G B Ritschel; T Schroeder
Journal:  Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1990-03

3.  Reduced inter- and intraindividual variability in cyclosporine pharmacokinetics from a microemulsion formulation.

Authors:  J M Kovarik; E A Mueller; J B van Bree; W Tetzloff; K Kutz
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 3.534

4.  Improved dose linearity of cyclosporine pharmacokinetics from a microemulsion formulation.

Authors:  E A Mueller; J M Kovarik; J B van Bree; W Tetzloff; J Grevel; K Kutz
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 4.200

5.  Influence of a fat-rich meal on the pharmacokinetics of a new oral formulation of cyclosporine in a crossover comparison with the market formulation.

Authors:  E A Mueller; J M Kovarik; J B van Bree; J Grevel; P W Lücker; K Kutz
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 4.200

6.  Sandimmune Neoral in paediatric liver transplant recipients with malabsorption of cyclosporin A.

Authors:  P R Atkison; D R Grant; S E Williams; J Howard; W J Wall; C R Stiller
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 1.066

7.  The Neoral formulation: improved correlation between cyclosporine trough levels and exposure in stable renal transplant recipients.

Authors:  B D Kahan; J Dunn; C Fitts; D Van Buren; D Wombolt; R Pollak; R Carson; J W Alexander; C Chang; M Choc
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 1.066

Review 8.  Potential for CsA-Neoral in organ transplantation.

Authors:  G Levy; D Grant
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 1.066

9.  Effect of bile on cyclosporin absorption in liver transplant patients.

Authors:  M U Mehta; R Venkataramanan; G J Burckart; R J Ptachcinski; B Delamos; S Stachak; D H Van Thiel; S Iwatsuki; T E Starzl
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 4.335

10.  Nephrotoxicity of cyclosporin A in liver and kidney transplant patients.

Authors:  G B Klintmalm; S Iwatsuki; T E Starzl
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1981-02-28       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  15 in total

1.  Bayesian estimation of cyclosporin exposure for routine therapeutic drug monitoring in kidney transplant patients.

Authors:  Hélène Bourgoin; Gilles Paintaud; Matthias Büchler; Yvon Lebranchu; Elisabeth Autret-Leca; France Mentré; Chantal Le Guellec
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 2.  Drug disposition in cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  E Rey; J M Tréluyer; G Pons
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 6.447

3.  Population pharmacokinetic model to predict steady-state exposure to once-daily cyclosporin microemulsion in renal transplant recipients.

Authors:  Franziska Schädeli; Hans-Peter Marti; Felix J Frey; Dominik E Uehlinger
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 4.  Clinical Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Considerations in the Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

Authors:  Luc J J Derijks; Dennis R Wong; Daniel W Hommes; Adriaan A van Bodegraven
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 6.447

5.  Pharmacokinetic interaction between tacrolimus and diltiazem: dose-response relationship in kidney and liver transplant recipients.

Authors:  Terry E Jones; Raymond G Morris
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 6.  Chronopharmacokinetics of ciclosporin and tacrolimus.

Authors:  Massimo Baraldo; Mario Furlanut
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 7.  The use of other drugs to allow a lower dosage of cyclosporin to be used. Therapeutic and pharmacoeconomic considerations.

Authors:  T E Jones
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 8.  Cyclosporin microemulsion (Neoral). A pharmacoeconomic review of its use compared with standard cyclosporin in renal and hepatic transplantation.

Authors:  A J Coukell; G L Plosker
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 9.  Methods for clinical monitoring of cyclosporin in transplant patients.

Authors:  R J Dumont; M H Ensom
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 10.  Distribution of cyclosporin in organ transplant recipients.

Authors:  Fatemeh Akhlaghi; Andrew K Trull
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 6.447

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.