Literature DB >> 31656745

Optimisation of shock wave lithotripsy: a systematic review of technical aspects to improve outcomes.

Su-Min Lee1, Neil Collin2, Helen Wiseman2, Joe Philip1.   

Abstract

Shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) remains an important treatment option for the management of upper urinary tract stones. The optimisation of certain technical principles can help to improve the results of SWL. We performed a systematic review based on preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis (PRISMA) standards for studies reporting on technical aspects of SWL. A literature search was conducted on the PubMed database between January 1984 and November 2018 using 'shockwave lithotripsy' and 'stone' as keywords. Summaries and manuscripts of relevant articles were reviewed in order to select studies with the best level of evidence in each theme covered during the review. From 4,135 titles, 165 abstracts and full-text articles were reviewed. Overall, SWL has good outcomes in the treatment of upper urinary tract stones. It remains the only truly non-invasive stone treatment. While stone-free rate (SFR) might not be equivalent to ureteroscopy or percutaneous nephrolithotomy outcomes, SWL can be optimised by changing several technical factors, including type of machine, patient position, number, rate and energy of shocks, stone targeting, and patient analgesia. For each of these included SWL themes, relevant and selected studies with the highest level of evidence were described and discussed. Paired with these improved technical factors and appropriate patient selection, SWL, with its low complication rates, remains an excellent treatment option in 2019. 2019 Translational Andrology and Urology. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Shock wave lithotripsy (SWL); optimisation; outcome

Year:  2019        PMID: 31656745      PMCID: PMC6790411          DOI: 10.21037/tau.2019.06.07

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transl Androl Urol        ISSN: 2223-4683


  44 in total

1.  What should be the ideal time interval between repeated extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy sessions for renal stone treatment?

Authors:  Senol Adanur; Tevfik Ziypak; Turgut Yapanoglu; Ozkan Polat
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  Analgesic requirements for ESWL treatment. A double blind study.

Authors:  Y H Rasmussen; C Dahl
Journal:  Scand J Urol Nephrol       Date:  1994-09

3.  Kidney mobility during respiration.

Authors:  L H Schwartz; J Richaud; L Buffat; E Touboul; M Schlienger
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 6.280

4.  Mechanical percussion, inversion and diuresis for residual lower pole fragments after shock wave lithotripsy: a prospective, single blind, randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  K T Pace; N Tariq; S J Dyer; M J Weir; R J D'A Honey
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Does simultaneous inversion during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy improve stone clearance: a long-term, prospective, single-blind, randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Wing Seng Leong; Men Long Liong; Yee Vonne Liong; David Bin-Chia Wu; Shaun Wen Huey Lee
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2013-09-14       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Ultrasound monitoring of kidney stone extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy with an external transducer: does fatty tissue cause image distortions that affect stone comminution?

Authors:  Christian Bohris; Thomas Bayer; Rudolf Gumpinger
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.942

7.  Comparison of intravenous sedation versus general anesthesia on the efficacy of the Doli 50 lithotriptor.

Authors:  Carsten Sorensen; Paramjit Chandhoke; Michael Moore; Connie Wolf; Ali Sarram
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Comparison of an electromagnetic and an electrohydraulic lithotripter: Efficacy, pain and complications.

Authors:  Grazia Bianchi; Diego Marega; Roberto Knez; Stefano Bucci; Carlo Trombetta
Journal:  Arch Ital Urol Androl       Date:  2018-09-30

9.  Comparison of 2 generations of piezoelectric lithotriptors using matched pair analysis.

Authors:  C F Ng; L McLornan; T J Thompson; D A Tolley
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Ultrasonography Is Not Inferior to Fluoroscopy to Guide Extracorporeal Shock Waves during Treatment of Renal and Upper Ureteric Calculi: A Randomized Prospective Study.

Authors:  Jeroen Van Besien; Pieter Uvin; Isabeau Hermie; Thomas Tailly; Luc Merckx
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 3.411

View more
  7 in total

1.  Extremely slow, half-number shockwave lithotripsy for ureteral stones.

Authors:  Shinya Somiya; Shigeki Koterazawa; Katsuhiro Ito; Takao Haitani; Hitoshi Yamada; Toru Kanno
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2022-08-15       Impact factor: 2.861

2.  Outcomes of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for ureteral stones according to ESWL intensity.

Authors:  Ji Hyung Yoon; Sejun Park; Seong Cheol Kim; Sungchan Park; Kyung Hyun Moon; Sang Hyeon Cheon; Taekmin Kwon
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-04

3.  Shock wave lithotripsy for a renal stone in a tetraplegic patient as a trigger for life-threatening posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome.

Authors:  Gianluca Sampogna; Matteo Maltagliati; Bernardo Rocco; Salvatore Micali; Emanuele Montanari; Michele Spinelli
Journal:  Urol Case Rep       Date:  2020-04-09

4.  Extremely-slow, half-number shockwave lithotripsy for asymptomatic renal stones <20 mm.

Authors:  Katsuhiro Ito; Toshifumi Takahashi; Toru Kanno; Takashi Okada; Yoshihito Higashi; Hitoshi Yamada
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2020-12-03

5.  What is the best way to manage ureteric calculi in the time of COVID-19? A comparison of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) and ureteroscopy (URS) in an Australian health-care setting.

Authors:  Matthew Farag; Gregory S Jack; Lih-Ming Wong; Damien M Bolton; Daniel Lenaghan
Journal:  BJUI Compass       Date:  2020-11-07

Review 6.  Minimally invasive surgery for pediatric renal and ureteric stones: A therapeutic update.

Authors:  Tao Peng; Hongcai Zhong; Baohui Hu; Shankun Zhao
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 3.569

7.  The efficacy and safety of diuretics on extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy treatment of urolithiasis: A systematic review and meta analysis.

Authors:  Liying Dong; Fengyao Wang; Hongyan Chen; Youyi Lu; Yong Zhang; Linjing Chen; Yuanshan Cui
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 1.817

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.