Literature DB >> 7931751

How do physicians talk with their patients about risks?

A Kalet1, J C Roberts, R Fletcher.   

Abstract

To describe the communication about risk between community-based physicians and their patients, the authors audiotaped 160 physician-patient encounters in the private practices of 19 physicians. Coding was done using a structured scheme to identify the presence of talk about risk of future illness, and to describe its characteristics. Patient understanding and satisfaction were assessed through an interview. Risk discussion occurred in 26% (95% CI 19%-33%) of the visits, quantitatively in two cases and specifically with respect to outcome in 48% (95% CI 40%-56%) of the visits. The patients initiated only 16% of this discussion but were, in general, satisfied with their care and the information they had received, but they had poor recall of the specifics of the discussion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7931751     DOI: 10.1007/bf02629523

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  14 in total

1.  Absolutely relative: how research results are summarized can affect treatment decisions.

Authors:  L Forrow; W C Taylor; R M Arnold
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 4.965

2.  The expression of health risk information.

Authors:  E S Berger; W R Hendee
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1989-07

3.  Why the goals of informed consent are not realized: treatise on informed consent for the primary care physician.

Authors:  D J Mazur
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1988 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  On the elicitation of preferences for alternative therapies.

Authors:  B J McNeil; S G Pauker; H C Sox; A Tversky
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1982-05-27       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice.

Authors:  A Tversky; D Kahneman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1981-01-30       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 6.  Counseling women at high risk for breast cancer.

Authors:  M E Stefanek
Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 2.990

7.  The framing effect of relative and absolute risk.

Authors:  D J Malenka; J A Baron; S Johansen; J W Wahrenberger; J M Ross
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Medical students' and residents' estimates of cardiac risk.

Authors:  T G Tape; R S Wigton
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1989 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.583

9.  Fallacy of the five-year survival in lung cancer.

Authors:  B J McNeil; R Weichselbaum; S G Pauker
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1978-12-21       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Measured enthusiasm: does the method of reporting trial results alter perceptions of therapeutic effectiveness?

Authors:  C D Naylor; E Chen; B Strauss
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1992-12-01       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  11 in total

1.  Communication about risk--dilemmas for general practitioners. The Department of General Practice Working Group, University of Wales College of Medicine.

Authors:  A Edwards; L Prior
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  A Randomized Study of Patient Risk Perception for Incidental Renal Findings on Diagnostic Imaging Tests.

Authors:  Stella K Kang; Laura D Scherer; Alec J Megibow; Leslie J Higuita; Nathanael Kim; R Scott Braithwaite; Angela Fagerlin
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 3.  Enlightened individual choice vs the public's health: rational prevention from whose perspective?

Authors:  L Goldman
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Discomfort of patient power. Patients are not doctors' equals.

Authors:  Daniel McQueen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-05-18

5.  The knowledge value-chain of genetic counseling for breast cancer: an empirical assessment of prediction and communication processes.

Authors:  Nabil Amara; Jolyane Blouin-Bougie; Jalila Jbilou; Norrin Halilem; Jacques Simard; Réjean Landry
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.375

6.  Patient-Perceived Versus Actual Risk of Cardiovascular Disease and Associated Willingness to Consider and Use Prevention Therapy.

Authors:  Ann Marie Navar; Tracy Y Wang; Shuang Li; Xiaojuan Mi; Zhuokai Li; Jennifer G Robinson; Salim S Virani; Eric D Peterson
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2021-01-13

7.  How do family physicians communicate about cardiovascular risk? Frequencies and determinants of different communication formats.

Authors:  Stefan Neuner-Jehle; Oliver Senn; Odette Wegwarth; Thomas Rosemann; Johann Steurer
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2011-04-05       Impact factor: 2.497

Review 8.  The construct of breast cancer risk perception: need for a better risk communication?

Authors:  E T M de Jonge; J Vlasselaer; G Van de Putte; J-C Schobbens
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2009

9.  Implementing an innovative consent form: the PREDICT experience.

Authors:  Carole Decker; Suzanne V Arnold; Olawale Olabiyi; Homaa Ahmad; Elizabeth Gialde; Jamie Luark; Lisa Riggs; Terry DeJaynes; Gabriel E Soto; John A Spertus
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2008-12-31       Impact factor: 7.327

10.  Rates of Mortality in Lumbar Spine Surgery and Factors Associated With Its Occurrence Over a 10-Year Period: A Study of 803,949 Patients in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample.

Authors:  Gregory Wyatt Poorman; John Y Moon; Charles Wang; Samantha R Horn; Bryan M Beaubrun; Olivia J Bono; Anne-Marie Francis; Cyrus M Jalai; Peter G Passias
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-10-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.