Literature DB >> 1543193

Absolutely relative: how research results are summarized can affect treatment decisions.

L Forrow1, W C Taylor, R M Arnold.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine whether alternative methods of presenting a contrast between the same two quantities in descriptions of research results could lead to different treatment decisions by physicians. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We conducted a survey of practicing physicians and of faculty and fellows in training programs in clinical epidemiology and social science research methods. Each questionnaire presented results from a published study of either hypertension or hypercholesterolemia in two different ways: once as the relative change in the outcome rate and once as the absolute change in the outcome rate. We asked respondents to read each summary and indicate how the information contained in the summary would influence decisions about treatment.
RESULTS: Of the 235 physicians who completed the questionnaire, 108 (46%) gave different responses to the same results presented in different ways. Of these, 97 (89.8%) indicated a stronger inclination to treat patients after reading of the relative change in the outcome rate (p less than 0.0001).
CONCLUSION: The manner of presentation of results can influence physicians' judgments about the treatment of patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1543193     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9343(92)90100-p

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med        ISSN: 0002-9343            Impact factor:   4.965


  76 in total

Review 1.  The effects of information framing on the practices of physicians.

Authors:  P McGettigan; K Sly; D O'Connell; S Hill; D Henry
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Statistics in medicine: some considerations from a clinician's point of view.

Authors:  J Collazos
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 2.401

3.  Reporting of numerical and statistical differences in abstracts: improving but not optimal.

Authors:  Eric Dryver; Janet E Hux
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Effect of various risk/benefit trade-offs on parents' understanding of a pediatric research study.

Authors:  Alan R Tait; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher; Angela Fagerlin; Terri Voepel-Lewis
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 5.  Tips for learners of evidence-based medicine: 1. Relative risk reduction, absolute risk reduction and number needed to treat.

Authors:  Alexandra Barratt; Peter C Wyer; Rose Hatala; Thomas McGinn; Antonio L Dans; Sheri Keitz; Virginia Moyer; Gordon Guyatt For
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2004-08-17       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Bridging the gap between therapeutic research results and physician prescribing decisions: knowledge transfer, a prerequisite to knowledge translation.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Boissel; Emmanuel Amsallem; Michel Cucherat; Patrice Nony; Margaret C Haugh
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2004-09-16       Impact factor: 2.953

7.  Does informed consent alter elderly patients' preferences for colorectal cancer screening? Results of a randomized trial.

Authors:  A M Wolf; J B Schorling
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  A randomized comparison of patients' understanding of number needed to treat and other common risk reduction formats.

Authors:  Stacey L Sheridan; Michael P Pignone; Carmen L Lewis
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 9.  Prescribers' Knowledge and Skills for Interpreting Research Results: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Leila Kahwati; Dennis Carmody; Nancy Berkman; Helen W Sullivan; Kathryn J Aikin; Jessica DeFrank
Journal:  J Contin Educ Health Prof       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 1.355

10.  A proposal for an additional clinical trial outcome measure assessing preventive effect as delay of events.

Authors:  Per Lytsy; Lars Berglund; Johan Sundström
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 8.082

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.