Literature DB >> 33435730

Patient-Perceived Versus Actual Risk of Cardiovascular Disease and Associated Willingness to Consider and Use Prevention Therapy.

Ann Marie Navar1, Tracy Y Wang1, Shuang Li1, Xiaojuan Mi1, Zhuokai Li1, Jennifer G Robinson2, Salim S Virani3, Eric D Peterson1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular prevention guidelines use estimated 10-year atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk based on the pooled cohort equations to guide treatment decisions and engage patients in shared decision-making. We sought to determine patient perceived versus actual risk of atherosclerotic CVD and associations with willingness for preventive therapy.
METHODS: We evaluated calculated and perceived CVD risk among 4187 patients across 124 sites in the Patient and Provider Assessment of Lipid Management Registry. Ten-year risk was assessed using the pooled cohort equations; risk relative-to-peers was determined based on age-, sex-, and race-based percentiles; and patient estimates of risk were assessed using patient surveys. Poisson regression models evaluated associations between risk estimates, statin use, and willingness to take prevention therapy.
RESULTS: Overall, there was no correlation between patients' estimates of their 10-year CVD risk and calculated 10-year risk (ρ=-0.01, Pcorrelation=0.46), regardless of age, sex, race, or socioeconomic status. The majority (72.2%) overestimated their 10-year CVD risk relative to the pooled cohorts equation (mean perceived 33.3% versus mean calculated 17.1%, Pdifference<0.01). Patients' perceptions of their risk relative-to-peers were slightly correlated with standardized risk percentiles (ρ=0.19, P<0.01), although most had overly optimistic views of how risk compared with their peers. Increasing perceived risk was not associated with current statin use (P=0.18) but was associated with willingness to consider future prevention therapy (P<0.01). Perceived risk relative-to-peers was associated with increased prevalent statin use (risk ratio 1.04 per category increase [95% CI, 1.02-1.06]) and reported willingness for prevention therapy (risk ratio 1.11 [95% CI, 1.07-1.16]).
CONCLUSIONS: When asked, most patients overestimate their 10-year risk but hold an optimistic bias of their risk relative to age-, race-, and sex-matched peers. Providing accurate absolute risk assessments to patients without proper context may paradoxically decrease many patients' perceived risk of CVD, thereby disincentivizing initiation of CVD risk reduction therapy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cardiovascular diseases; lipids; risk; risk assessment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33435730      PMCID: PMC7855929          DOI: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.120.006548

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes        ISSN: 1941-7713


  20 in total

1.  2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the treatment of blood cholesterol to reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Neil J Stone; Jennifer G Robinson; Alice H Lichtenstein; C Noel Bairey Merz; Conrad B Blum; Robert H Eckel; Anne C Goldberg; David Gordon; Daniel Levy; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Patrick McBride; J Sanford Schwartz; Susan T Shero; Sidney C Smith; Karol Watson; Peter W F Wilson; Karen M Eddleman; Nicole M Jarrett; Ken LaBresh; Lev Nevo; Janusz Wnek; Jeffrey L Anderson; Jonathan L Halperin; Nancy M Albert; Biykem Bozkurt; Ralph G Brindis; Lesley H Curtis; David DeMets; Judith S Hochman; Richard J Kovacs; E Magnus Ohman; Susan J Pressler; Frank W Sellke; Win-Kuang Shen; Sidney C Smith; Gordon F Tomaselli
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Unrealistic optimism about susceptibility to health problems: conclusions from a community-wide sample.

Authors:  N D Weinstein
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  1987-10

3.  Influence of Cardiovascular Risk Communication Tools and Presentation Formats on Patient Perceptions and Preferences.

Authors:  Ann Marie Navar; Tracy Y Wang; Xiaojuan Mi; Jennifer G Robinson; Salim S Virani; Veronique L Roger; Peter W F Wilson; Anne C Goldberg; Eric D Peterson
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 14.676

4.  The role of numeracy in understanding the benefit of screening mammography.

Authors:  L M Schwartz; S Woloshin; W C Black; H G Welch
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1997-12-01       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  How making a risk estimate can change the feel of that risk: shifting attitudes toward breast cancer risk in a general public survey.

Authors:  Angela Fagerlin; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher; Peter A Ubel
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2005-06

6.  How medical professionals evaluate expressions of probability.

Authors:  A Kong; G O Barnett; F Mosteller; C Youtz
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1986-09-18       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  How do physicians talk with their patients about risks?

Authors:  A Kalet; J C Roberts; R Fletcher
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  "If I'm better than average, then I'm ok?": Comparative information influences beliefs about risk and benefits.

Authors:  Angela Fagerlin; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher; Peter A Ubel
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2007-10-17

9.  Design and rationale for the Patient and Provider Assessment of Lipid Management (PALM) registry.

Authors:  Ann Marie Navar; Tracy Y Wang; Anne C Goldberg; Jennifer G Robinson; Veronique L Roger; Peter F Wilson; Salim S Virani; Joesph Elassal; L Veronica Lee; Laura E Webb; Eric Peterson
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 4.749

Review 10.  2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Paul K Whelton; Robert M Carey; Wilbert S Aronow; Donald E Casey; Karen J Collins; Cheryl Dennison Himmelfarb; Sondra M DePalma; Samuel Gidding; Kenneth A Jamerson; Daniel W Jones; Eric J MacLaughlin; Paul Muntner; Bruce Ovbiagele; Sidney C Smith; Crystal C Spencer; Randall S Stafford; Sandra J Taler; Randal J Thomas; Kim A Williams; Jeff D Williamson; Jackson T Wright
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 9.897

View more
  2 in total

1.  High-Intensity Statin Use Among Patients With Atherosclerosis in the U.S.

Authors:  Adam J Nelson; Kevin Haynes; Sonali Shambhu; Zubin Eapen; Mark J Cziraky; Michael G Nanna; Sara B Calvert; Kerrin Gallagher; Neha J Pagidipati; Christopher B Granger
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 27.203

2.  Contextual wellness in the age of COVID-19: Managing disproportionate pandemic anxiety and stress in Australia, Singapore and other nations achieving disease control success.

Authors:  George A Gellert; Tess E Gellert
Journal:  Health Promot J Austr       Date:  2022-01-10
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.