Literature DB >> 7930075

Effects of carrier frequency and background noise on the detection of mixed modulation.

B C Moore1, A Sek.   

Abstract

This article is concerned with the mechanisms underlying the detection of amplitude modulation (AM), frequency modulation (FM), and mixed modulation (MM), i.e., simultaneously occurring AM and FM. In a previous study [B. C. J. Moore and A. Sek, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 92, 3119-3131 (1992)], psychometric functions were measured for the detection of AM alone and FM alone, using a 10-Hz modulation rate and a 1-kHz carrier frequency. Detectability was then measured for combined AM and FM, with modulation depths selected so that each type of modulation would be equally detectable if presented alone. The detectability of the combined AM and FM was better than would be predicted if the two types of modulation were coded completely independently. Significant effects of relative modulator phase were found when detectability was relatively high, but these effects were not correctly predicted by either of two excitation-pattern models considered. The first experiment reported here was similar to the earlier experiment, but performance was compared for carrier frequencies of 1 and 6 kHz; at the latter frequency, neural synchrony to the stimulus fine structure (phase locking) does not occur. The results at both carrier frequencies were similar to those of our earlier experiment, suggesting that the presence or absence of phase-locking information plays little role in the detection of MM. The second experiment was again similar, but bands of noise were used to mask selectively either the upper or lower side of the excitation pattern of the modulated carrier. The phase effects in this case were in the direction predicted by excitation pattern models. The overall pattern of the results could be predicted reasonably well using a multichannel excitation pattern model based on the assumption that listeners use an unweighted sum of decision variables across all suprathreshold channels with a positive signal-to-noise ratio.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7930075     DOI: 10.1121/1.410312

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  11 in total

1.  The effect of narrow-band noise maskers on increment detection.

Authors:  Jessica J Messersmith; Harisadhan Patra; Walt Jesteadt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Using individual differences to test the role of temporal and place cues in coding frequency modulation.

Authors:  Kelly L Whiteford; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Assessing the Role of Place and Timing Cues in Coding Frequency and Amplitude Modulation as a Function of Age.

Authors:  Kelly L Whiteford; Heather A Kreft; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-04-20

4.  Auditory deficits in amusia extend beyond poor pitch perception.

Authors:  Kelly L Whiteford; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Interindividual variation of sensitivity to frequency modulation: its relation with click-evoked and distortion product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Sho Otsuka; Shigeto Furukawa; Shimpei Yamagishi; Koich Hirota; Makio Kashino
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-02-07

6.  Detection of sinusoidal amplitude modulation in logarithmic frequency sweeps across wide regions of the spectrum.

Authors:  I-Hui Hsieh; Kourosh Saberi
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-02-06       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Effects of Age and Hearing Loss on the Discrimination of Amplitude and Frequency Modulation for 2- and 10-Hz Rates.

Authors:  Brian C J Moore; Sashi Mariathasan; Aleksander P Sęk
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

8.  The Effects of Static and Moving Spectral Ripple Sensitivity on Unaided and Aided Speech Perception in Noise.

Authors:  Christi W Miller; Joshua G W Bernstein; Xuyang Zhang; Yu-Hsiang Wu; Ruth A Bentler; Kelly Tremblay
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 9.  The role of temporal fine structure processing in pitch perception, masking, and speech perception for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired people.

Authors:  Brian C J Moore
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2008-10-15

10.  The role of excitation-pattern cues in the detection of frequency shifts in bandpass-filtered complex tones.

Authors:  Frederic Marmel; Christopher J Plack; Kathryn Hopkins; Robert P Carlyon; Hedwig E Gockel; Brian C J Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.