Literature DB >> 7926918

Prospective audit of the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the west of Scotland. West of Scotland Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Audit Group.

G M Fullarton1, G Bell.   

Abstract

Although laparoscopic cholecystectomy has rapidly developed in the treatment of gall bladder disease in the absence of controlled clinical trial data its outcome parameters compared with open cholecystectomy remain unclear. A prospective audit of the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the west of Scotland over a two year period was carried out to attempt to assess this new procedure. A total of 45 surgeons in 19 hospitals performing laparoscopic cholecystectomy submitted prospective data from September 1990-1992. A total of 2285 cholecystectomies were audited (a completed data collection rate of 99%). Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was attempted in 1683 (74%) patients and completed in 1448 patients (median conversion rate to the open procedure 17%). The median operation time in the completed laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients was 100 minutes (range 30-330) and overall hospital stay three days (1-33). There were nine deaths (0.5%) after laparoscopic cholecystectomy although only two were directly attributable to the laparoscopic procedure. In the laparoscopic cholecystectomy group there were 99 complications (5.9%), 53 (3%) of these were major requiring further invasive intervention. Forty patients (2.4%) required early or delayed laparotomy for major complications such as bleeding or bile duct injuries. There were 11 (0.7%) bile duct injuries in the laparoscopic cholecystectomy series, five were noted during the initial procedure and six were recognised later resulting from jaundice or bile leaks. Ductal injuries occurred after a median of 20 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. In conclusion laparoscopic cholecystectomy has rapidly replaced open cholecystectomy in the treatment of gall bladder disease. Although the overall death and complication rate associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy is similar to open cholecystectomy, the bile duct injury rate is higher.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7926918      PMCID: PMC1375067          DOI: 10.1136/gut.35.8.1121

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gut        ISSN: 0017-5749            Impact factor:   23.059


  26 in total

1.  [Cholecystectomy by coelioscopy].

Authors:  F Dubois; G Berthelot; H Levard
Journal:  Presse Med       Date:  1989-05-13       Impact factor: 1.228

2.  Laparoscopic laser cholecystectomy: analysis of 500 procedures.

Authors:  A T Spaw; E J Reddick; D O Olsen
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1991-03

3.  Complications of biliary surgery.

Authors:  K S Scher; C E Scott-Conner
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 0.688

4.  Coelioscopic cholecystectomy. Preliminary report of 36 cases.

Authors:  F Dubois; P Icard; G Berthelot; H Levard
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Laparoscopic laser cholecystectomy. A comparison with mini-lap cholecystectomy.

Authors:  E J Reddick; D O Olsen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Gallstones: laparoscopic treatment, intracorporeal lithotripsy followed by cholecystostomy or cholecystectomy--a personal technique.

Authors:  J Perissat; D R Collet; R Belliard
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 10.093

7.  Morbidity of surgical treatment for nonmalignant biliary tract disease.

Authors:  F Glenn; C K McSherry; P Dineen
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1968-01

8.  Bile duct injury during cholecystectomy: causes, prevention and surgical repair in 1979.

Authors:  G A Kune
Journal:  Aust N Z J Surg       Date:  1979-02

9.  Accidental lesions of the common bile duct at cholecystectomy. Pre- and perioperative factors of importance.

Authors:  A Andrén-Sandberg; G Alinder; S Bengmark
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Modern standards for comparison of cholecystectomy with alternative treatments for symptomatic cholelithiasis with emphasis on long-term relief of symptoms.

Authors:  T M Gilliland; L W Traverso
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1990-01
View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Fortnightly review: gallbladder disease.

Authors:  M C Bateson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-06-26

2.  Stratification for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  W T van den Broek; A B Bijnen; P de Ruiter
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Comparative study between clipless laparoscopic cholecystectomy by harmonic scalpel versus conventional method: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Tharwat Kandil; Ayman El Nakeeb; Emad El Hefnawy
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-10-31       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Litigious consequences of open and laparoscopic biliary surgical mishaps.

Authors:  J G Chandler; C R Voyles; T L Floore; L A Bartholomew
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  1997 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Increased cholecystectomy rate after the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Scotland.

Authors:  C M Lam; F E Murray; A Cuschieri
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 6.  Robot assistant versus human or another robot assistant in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy; Kumarakrishnan Samraj; Giuseppe Fusai; Brian R Davidson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-09-12

7.  On the road to single-site laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: lessons learned from 60 cases.

Authors:  Cherry E Koh; David J Martin; David J Cavallucci; Guillermo Becerril-Martinez; Craig J Taylor
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-10-17       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  Hemobilia due to cystic artery stump pseudoaneurysm following laparoscopic cholecystectomy: case presentation and literature review.

Authors:  Athanasios Petrou; Nicholas Brennan; Zahir Soonawalla; Michael Anthony Silva
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2012 Apr-Jun

9.  Impact on laboratory training in subsequent performance of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Toshihiko Shinohara; Tetsuji Fujita; Takeyuki Misawa; Taro Sakamoto; Kazuhiko Yoshida; Hideyuki Kashiwagi; Katsuhiko Yanaga
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2008-08-28       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 10.  Cholecystectomy versus no cholecystectomy in patients with silent gallstones.

Authors:  K S Gurusamy; K Samraj
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-01-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.